Investigator

Kjetil Taskén

Professor · University of Oslo, Institute for Clinical Medicine

KTKjetil Taskén
Papers(2)
Patient‐derived acell…Evolutionary mode and…
Collaborators(5)
Ola MyklebostRolf I. SkotheimAlfonso UrbanucciAnita SveenKatharina Bischof
Institutions(5)
University Of OsloUniversity of BergenUniversity of OsloTampere UniversityOslo University Hospi…

Papers

Patient‐derived acellular ascites fluid affects drug responses in ovarian cancer cell lines through the activation of key signalling pathways

Malignant ascites is commonly produced in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and serves as unique microenvironment for tumour cells. Acellular ascites fluid (AAF) is rich in signalling molecules and has been proposed to play a role in the induction of chemoresistance. Through in vitro testing of drug sensitivity and by assessing intracellular phosphorylation status in response to mono‐ and combination treatment of five EOC cell lines after incubation with AAFs derived from 20 different patients, we investigated the chemoresistance‐inducing potential of ascites. We show that the addition of AAFs to the culture media of EOC cell lines has the potential to induce resistance to standard‐of‐care drugs (SCDs). We also show that AAFs induce time‐ and concentration‐dependent activation of downstream signalling to signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), and concomitantly altered phosphorylation of mitogen‐activated protein kinase kinase (MEK), phosphoinositide 3‐kinase (PI3K)–protein kinase B (AKT) and nuclear factor NF‐kappa‐B (NFκB). Antibodies targeting the interleukin‐6 receptor (IL6R) effectively blocked phosphorylation of STAT3 and STAT1. Treatments with SCDs were effective in reducing cell viability in only a third of 30 clinically relevant conditions examined, defined as combinations of drugs, different cell lines and AAFs. Combinations of SCDs and novel therapeutics such as trametinib, fludarabine or rapamycin were superior in another third. Notably, we could nominate effective treatment combinations in almost all conditions except in 4 out of 30 conditions, in which trametinib or fludarabine showed higher efficacy alone. Taken together, our study underscores the importance of the molecular characterisation of individual patients' AAFs and the impact on treatment resistance as providing clinically meaningful information for future precision treatment approaches in EOC.

Evolutionary mode and timing of dissemination of high-grade serous carcinomas

Dissemination within the peritoneal cavity is a main determinant of poor patient outcomes from high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs). The dissemination process is poorly understood from a cancer evolutionary perspective. We reconstructed the evolutionary trajectories across a median of 5 tumor sites and regions from each of 23 patients based on deep whole-exome sequencing. Polyclonal cancer origin was detected in 1 patient. Ovarian tumors had more complex subclonal architectures than other intraperitoneal tumors in each patient, which indicated that tumors developed earlier in the ovaries. Three common modes of dissemination were identified, including monoclonal or polyclonal dissemination of monophyletic (linear) or polyphyletic (branched) subclones. Mutation profiles of initial or disseminated clones varied greatly among cancers, but recurrent mutations were found in 7 cancer-critical genes, including TP53, BRCA1, BRCA2, and DNMT3A, and in the PI3K/AKT1 pathway. Disseminated clones developed late in the evolutionary trajectory models of most cancers, in particular in cancers with DNA damage repair deficiency. Polyclonal dissemination was predicted to occur predominantly as a single and rapid wave, but chemotherapy exposure was associated with higher genomic diversity of disseminated clones. In conclusion, we described three common evolutionary dissemination modes across HGSCs and proposed factors associated with dissemination diversity.

417Works
2Papers
5Collaborators
NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorApoptosisTumor MicroenvironmentBiomarkers, TumorOvarian NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial

Positions

2018–

Professor

University of Oslo · Institute for Clinical Medicine

2018–

Head and Director

Oslo University Hospital · Institute for Cancer Research

2008–

Director and Professor

University of Oslo · Centre for Molecular Medicine Norway, Nordic EMBL Partnership

2001–

Professor of Medicine

Universitetet i Oslo · Inst. Basic Med. Sci, Dept Mol. Med., Div. Biochem.

2003–

Director and Professor

University of Oslo · Biotechnology Centre of Oslo

Links & IDs
0000-0003-2841-4697

Scopus: 57220420156

Researcher Id: GQR-0078-2022