Investigator

Kirk J. McManus

Professor · University of Manitoba, Biochemistry & Medical Genetics

Research Interests

KJMKirk J. McManus
Papers(3)
Exploring the role of…Referral, Genetic Cou…Reduced SKP1 and CUL1…
Collaborators(6)
Mark W. NachtigalAlon D. AltmanSarah KeanSelina CasalinoJessica N. HartleyKathleen M. Decker
Institutions(3)
University Of ManitobaUniversity of ManitobaMount Sinai Hospital

Papers

Exploring the role of a multidisciplinary hereditary gynecologic oncology clinic in epithelial ovarian cancer risk‐reducing surgical decision‐making practices: A mixed‐methods study

AbstractIndividuals that have gynecologic reproductive organs with pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (“BRCA‐positive”) have an increased risk of developing high‐grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). The majority of HGSOC develops in the fallopian tubes and later spreads to the ovaries and peritoneal cavity. Therefore, risk‐reducing salpingo‐oophorectomy (RRSO) is recommended for those who are BRCA‐positive to preventatively remove their ovaries and fallopian tubes. The Hereditary Gynecology Clinic (HGC) is a provincial program in Winnipeg, Canada, that specifically targets care to the unique needs of such individuals through an interdisciplinary team of gynecological oncologists, menopause specialists, and registered nurses. A mixed‐methods study design was used to explore the decision‐making processes of these BRCA‐positive individuals who have been recommended (or who completed) RRSO and experiences with healthcare providers at the HGC influenced this decision. Individuals who are BRCA‐positive without a previous diagnosis of HGSOC and who had previously received genetic counselling were recruited from the HGC and the provincial cancer genetics program (Shared Health Program of Genetics & Metabolism). Forty‐three people completed a survey and 15 participated in an in‐depth interview about their experiences and decisions surrounding RRSO. Surveys were analyzed to compare scores on validated scales related to decision‐making and cancer‐related worry. Qualitative interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using interpretive description. Participants described the complex decisions faced by those who are BRCA‐positive, which are intertwined with life experiences and circumstances including age, marital status, and family disease history. Participants interpreted their HGSOC risk through a personalized “lens” of contextual factors that impacted perceptions about the practical and emotional implications of RRSO and the need for surgery. Mean scores on validated scales evaluating the HGC's impact on decisional outcomes and preparedness for decision‐making about RRSO were not significant, indicating that the HGC played a supportive role, rather than helping with decision‐making itself. Therefore, we present a novel framework that consolidates the various influences on decision‐making and connects them to the psychological and practical implications of RRSO in the context of the HGC. Strategies for improving support, decisional outcomes, and the overall experiences of individuals who are BRCA‐positive attending the HGC are also described.

Referral, Genetic Counselling, and BRCA Testing in the Manitoba High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Population, 2004–2019

(1) Background: The primary objective of this study was to examine the rate of genetic referral, BRCA testing, and BRCA positivity amongst all patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOC) from 2004–2019. The secondary objective was to analyze secondary factors that may affect the rates of referral and testing. (2) Methods: This population-based cohort study included all women diagnosed with HGSOC using the Manitoba Cancer Registry, CervixCheck registry, Medical Claims database at Manitoba Health, the Hospital Discharge abstract, the Population Registry, and Winnipeg Regional Health Authority genetics data. Data were examined for three different time cohorts (2004–2013, 2014–2016; 2017–2019) correlating to practice pattern changes. (3) Results: A total of 944 patients were diagnosed with HGSOC. The rate of genetic referrals changed over the three timeframes (20.0% → 56.7% → 36.6%) and rate of genetic testing increased over the entire timeframe. Factors found to increase rates of referral and testing included age, histology, history of oral contraceptive use, and family history of ovarian cancer. Prior health care utilization indicators did not affect genetic referral or testing. (4) Conclusion: The rate of genetic referral (2004–2016) and BRCA1/2 testing (2004–2019) for patients with a diagnosis of HGSOC increased over time. A minority of patients received a consultation for genetics counselling, and even fewer received testing for a BRCA1/2. Without a genetic result, it is difficult for clinicians to inform treatment decisions. Additional efforts are needed to increase genetics consultation and testing for Manitoban patients with HGSOC. Effects of routine tumour testing on rates of genetic referral will have to be examined in future studies.

69Works
3Papers
6Collaborators
NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsGenes, Tumor SuppressorCell Line, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsBrain NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial

Positions

2021–

Professor

University of Manitoba · Biochemistry & Medical Genetics

2009–

Senior Scientist

CancerCare Manitoba · Paul Albrechtsen Research Institute CancerCare Manitoba

2015–

Associate Professor

University of Manitoba · Biochemistry & Medical Genetics

2009–

Assistant Professor

University of Manitoba · Biochemistry & Medical Genetics

Education

2004

PhD

University of Alberta · Experimental Oncology

1999

MSc

University of Manitoba · Human Genetics

1995

BSc (Honours)

University of Manitoba

Country

CA

Keywords
colorectal cancerovarian cancerchromosome instabilitysynthetic lethality
Links & IDs