Investigator

Kenneth H. Mayer

Professor · Harvard School of Public Health, Global Health and Population

About

Research Interests

KHMKenneth H. Mayer
Papers(1)
Gender-Affirming Horm…
Collaborators(2)
Sari L. ReisnerCarl G. Streed
Institutions(2)
Fenway HealthBoston University Cho…

Papers

Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy and Cervical Cancer Screening Rates in Transgender Men and Nonbinary People: A Cross-Sectional Study from a Boston Community Health Center

Purpose: Clinical monitoring for patients receiving gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) has the potential to facilitate their receipt of preventive health services. We aimed to determine whether GAHT is associated with increased utilization of cervical cancer screening among transgender men (TM) and nonbinary persons assigned female at birth (NB-AFAB). Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study of a single community health center in Boston. Persons of all gender identities eligible for cervical cancer screening during 2008–2019 were assessed. The outcome of interest was receipt of cervical cancer screening based on U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. We compared the proportion of persons who received cervical cancer screening by prescription of GAHT. Results: We identified 13,267 eligible persons. This cohort included 10,547 (79.5%) cisgender women, 1547 (11.7%) TM, and 1173 (8.8%) NB-AFAB persons. Among all persons eligible for cervical cancer screening, TM and NB-AFAB persons were less likely to receive screening than cisgender women (56.2% and 56.1% vs. 60.5% respectively; odds ratio [OR] = 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75–0.93; OR = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.74–0.94, respectively). Among TM, those prescribed testosterone were more likely to receive cervical cancer screening than those not prescribed testosterone (57.9% vs. 48.2%, OR = 1.47; 95% CI = 1.14–1.92). Among NB-AFAB adults, those prescribed testosterone were more likely to receive cervical cancer screening than those not prescribed testosterone (61.9% vs. 51.5%, OR = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.21–1.93). Conclusions: The benefits of engagement in care to access GAHT may extend beyond the hormonal intervention to preventive health services.

117Works
1Papers
2Collaborators
HIV InfectionsTuberculosisSexually Transmitted DiseasesAcquired Immunodeficiency SyndromePapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsEarly Detection of Cancer

Positions

2013–

Professor

Harvard School of Public Health · Global Health and Population

2012–

Professor

Harvard Medical School · Medicine

2011–

Director, HIV Prevention Research

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · Medicine

1980–

Staff Physician and Medical Research Director

Fenway Health · The Fenway Institute

1993–

Professor

Brown University · Medicine & Community Health

Education

1977

MD

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

1972

BA

University of Pennsylvania

Country

US

Keywords
HIVAIDSPrEPTasPantiretroviralschemoprophylaxis