Kazuki Yamano

Possible overestimation of treatment effects of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for early-stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma: a retrospective propensity-score weighted multi-center cohort study

The treatment effects of lymphadenectomy in early-stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) reported in previous studies may have been overestimated owing to confounding factors. This study aimed to investigate the treatment effect of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PeNPAN) in early-stage OCCC, with careful adjustment for potential confounders. This retrospective multi-center cohort study involved women with preoperatively suspected stage I OCCC. We included patients who underwent surgery for OCCC between 2005 and 2019 at 11 affiliated institutions. The exposure (PeNPAN) group comprised patients who underwent PeNPAN. The primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS). Additionally, hazard ratios (HRs) of lymphadenectomy for DFS were estimated using unadjusted and propensity score-weighted Cox regression models and biased models applied in previous studies. To identify strong confounders, we further examined factors associated with recurrence that differed between the groups. We analyzed 304 women who underwent surgery for preoperatively suspected stage I OCCC. The unadjusted HR for DFS was 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.36-1.09; p=0.10), and the propensity-score adjusted HR was 0.82 (95% CI=0.42-1.58; p=0.55). The biased model showed a statistically significant HR of 0.59 (95% CI=0.36-1.00; p=0.048). Adhesions in the Douglas' pouch and cardiovascular disease were associated with recurrence and were more prevalent in the control group, suggesting potential confounders. After adjusting for potential confounders, the observed treatment effects of lymphadenectomy in the biased models were no longer statistically significant. Future investigations should carefully account for possible confounders, including intraoperative adhesions and comorbidities.