Investigator

Kathleen E. Bennett

Head of Data Science Centre · RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Population Health Sciences

KEBKathleen E. Benne…
Papers(1)
Clinical Management o…
Collaborators(2)
Lajos PusztaiCatherine M. Kelly
Institutions(3)
Royal College Of Surg…Yale UniversityMater Private Hospita…

Papers

Clinical Management of Ovarian Function Suppression in Premenopausal Women With Breast Cancer: A Survey of Members of ASCO

PURPOSE Ovarian function suppression (OFS) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHas) is a standard of care for premenopausal patients with high-risk stage II/III hormone receptor–positive breast cancer (BC). Practical guidance on the optimal choice of GnRHa, timing, schedule, and monitoring is limited. Our aim was to determine how oncologists use OFS in routine care. METHODS We designed a questionnaire to determine the choice of GnRHa, schedule, duration, initiation, use of bone modifiers, and monitoring of estradiol (E2). The questionnaire was sent to oncologists treating BC, in practice for >1 year and participating in the ASCO Research Survey Pool (RSP). It was also forwarded by investigators to oncologists meeting these criteria. The survey was open between November 14, 2023, and January 5, 2024. RESULTS Of 996 oncologists participating in the ASCO RSP, 178 (18%) completed the survey. An additional 56 oncologists contacted by investigators responded. Respondents were from the United States (57%), Asia (15%), and Europe (14%). Goserelin (54%) and leuprolide (39%) were the most frequently used GnRHas and were administered once every month by 46%. Approaches to starting GnRHas were varied. Most continued them for the duration of aromatase inhibitor therapy (57%). Estradiol monitoring was performed regularly, sometimes, or never by 43%, 27%, and 27%, respectively. The E2 assays used were standard (65%), ultrasensitive (16%), and unknown (14%). Interpreting E2 assay results were considered difficult by 55%; however, 62% of oncologists changed treatment on the basis of them. A total of 92% of respondents would like ASCO guidance on the practical use of OFS. CONCLUSION Considerable practice variation exists for similar clinical scenarios in OFS administration. Respondents would welcome ASCO guidance on all aspects of OFS.

435Works
1Papers
2Collaborators
Cross InfectionBreast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsNeoplasm MetastasisInfection ControlNeoplasmsBrain NeoplasmsMyeloproliferative Disorders

Positions

2021–

Head of Data Science Centre

RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences · Population Health Sciences

2016–

Associate Professor in Biostatistics/Pharmacoepidemiology

Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland · Population Health Sciences

2001–

Biostatistician/Pharmacoepidemiologist

Trinity College Dublin · Pharmacology and Therapeutics

1999–

Research fellow

University of Manchester · Cancer group

1993–

Clinical trials statistician

MRC Institute of Hearing Research

1988–

Clinical Trials statistician

Pfizer Global Research and Development Europe

Education

1993

PhD statistics

University of Southampton · Mathematics and statistics

1988

BSc Mathematics and statistics

University of Southampton · Mathematics

Country

IE

Keywords
PharmacoepidemiologyBiostatisticsEpidemiologyPopulation Health