Karen Leroy

Maintenance olaparib after platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic endometrial cancer: GINECO randomized phase IIb UTOLA trial

Single-agent maintenance poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition may represent an effective strategy in patients with advanced/metastatic endometrial cancer responding to platinum-based chemotherapy, including for molecular subtypes with suboptimal options. To explore this approach, we initiated the randomized phase IIb UTOLA trial (NCT03745950). Female patients without progression following front-line platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic endometrial cancer were randomized 2:1 to twice-daily maintenance oral olaparib 300 mg or placebo until progression or intolerance, stratified by p53 status, mismatch repair status, and response to initial chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints were PFS in subgroups, time to second progression or death, time to first and second subsequent therapy, objective response rate, overall survival, patient-reported outcomes, and safety. In the intention-to-treat population (n = 145), there was no PFS difference between olaparib and placebo (median 5.6 vs. 4.0 months, respectively; hazard ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.65-1.35; p = 0.74). However, intriguing numerical PFS effects were observed in exploratory analyses of pre-specified subgroups (p53-abnormal, complete response to initial chemotherapy, chromosomal instability). There was no overall survival difference between treatments. Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 36% versus 10% of olaparib- versus placebo-treated patients and were consistent with the olaparib safety profile in other cancers. Maintenance olaparib did not improve PFS, but promising numerical effects in subsets of patients warrant prospective evaluation.

Association between molecular classification and overall survival in patients with metastatic endometrial carcinoma: ancillary results of the UTOLA phase II GINECO trial

We aimed to describe the association between molecular sub-groups and outcomes in patients with advanced/metastatic endometrial carcinoma amenable to maintenance/active surveillance after carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Patients treated in the GINECO trial UTOLA (NCT03745950, randomly allocating patients 2:1 to olaparib/placebo after tumor control under carboplatin-based chemotherapy), with prospective centralized targeted next-generation sequencing, and mismatch repair and p53 immunostainings were included. Next-generation sequencing (667.5 kb) included POLE (exo-nuclease domain), TP53, PIK3CA, PIK3R1, PTEN, KRAS, and CTNNB1. Tumors were categorized following the 2022 European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology guidelines as POLE-mutated, mismatch repair-deficient, p53-abnormal (immunostaining or TP53 mutation), and with no specific molecular profile. Exploratory analyses categorized non-p53-abnormal tumors based on literature (mismatch repair-deficient: mutational burden; no specificity: PIK3R1/PTEN wild-type tumors, CTNNB1/KRAS-mutated tumors, others). Among 145 patients in the intention to treat population (median follow-up 31 months), 1, 21 (15%), 76 (53%), and 45 (32%) had POLE, mismatch repair-deficient, p53-abnormal, and non-specific tumors (2 missing mismatch repair), respectively. Molecular characterization was associated with progression-free (log-rank, p = .017) and overall survival (p < .001). Patients with p53abn tumors had a hazard ratio for death of 2.43, 95% confidence interval 1.50 to 3.93 (adjusted on age, stage IV, measurable lesions after chemotherapy). Exploratory analyses showed high mutational burden mismatch repair-deficient tumors with prognostic similar to p53abn tumors, whereas tumors with lower mutational burden had better progression-free survival. PIK3R1/PTEN wild-type and CTNNB1/KRAS-mutated non-specific tumors had better outcomes than p53abn tumors. Other non-specific tumors have survival similar to p53abn tumors. Integration of molecular sub-group as a stratification parameter might be considered for randomized trials in advanced/metastatic endometrial carcinoma after carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Deeper characterization of mismatch repair-proficient tumors might enhance prognostication.

Discovery and validation of a transcriptional signature identifying homologous recombination-deficient breast, endometrial and ovarian cancers

Molecular alterations leading to homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) are heterogeneous. We aimed to identify a transcriptional profile shared by endometrial (UCEC), breast (BRCA) and ovarian (OV) cancers with HRD. Genes differentially expressed with HRD genomic score (continuous gHRD score) in UCEC/BRCA/OV were identified using edgeR, and used to train a RNAseq score (ridge-regression model) predictive of the gHRD score (PanCanAtlas, N = 1684 samples). The RNAseq score was applied in independent gynaecological datasets (CARPEM/CPTAC/SCAN/TCGA, N = 4038 samples). Validations used ROC curves, linear regressions and Pearson correlations. Overall survival (OS) analyses used Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox models. In total, 656 genes were commonly up/downregulated with gHRD score in UCEC/BRCA/OV. Upregulated genes were enriched for nuclear/chromatin/DNA-repair processes, while downregulated genes for cytoskeleton (gene ontologies). The RNAseq score correlated with gHRD score in independent gynaecological cancers (R² = 0.4-0.7, Pearson correlation = 0.64-0.86, all P < 10 UCEC/BRCA/OV with HRD-associated genomic scars share a common transcriptional profile. RNAseq signatures might be relevant for identifying HRD-gynaecological cancers, for prognostication and for therapeutic decision.