Karen Kar Loen Chan

Return to intended oncological therapy following advanced ovarian cancer surgery: a narrative review

Summary Introduction Patients with advanced ovarian cancer often require radical cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy, with or without targeted therapy. Return to intended oncological therapy after surgery is a crucial metric, as delay can worsen survival. The concept of return to intended oncological therapy is important because it highlights the need for not just successful surgical outcomes, but also the ability to continue with the comprehensive cancer treatment plan. Methods A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted to identify relevant English language studies published from January 2010 to September 2024. Results Delayed return to intended oncological therapy after surgery was associated with poor survival outcomes in ovarian cancer. This narrative review investigates how pre‐operative counselling and education; optimisation of the patient's medical condition; meticulous surgical planning and execution; early recognition of complications; and comprehensive postoperative care influence return to intended therapy in gynaecological surgery. Effective multidisciplinary care involving anaesthetists; nurses; physiotherapists; dietitians; psychologists; and the patient's relatives or friends, can prevent complications and ensure timely return to intended oncological therapy. Discussion Awareness and management of factors affecting return to intended oncological therapy are essential for improving outcomes in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. We highlight the importance of multidisciplinary care (including enhanced recovery after surgery programmes) and the factors affecting these including age; nutrition; and occurrence of postoperative complications.

PAX1/SOX1 DNA Methylation Versus Cytology and HPV16/18 Genotyping for the Triage of High‐Risk HPV‐Positive Women in Cervical Cancer Screening: Retrospective Analysis of Archival Samples

ABSTRACTObjectiveTo compare the performance of cytology, HPV16/18 genotyping and PAX1/SOX1 methylation for the triage of high‐risk HPV‐positive cervical samples.DesignRetrospective analyses of archival samples collected from a large‐scale prospective randomised controlled trial.Setting/SampleHPV‐positive women recruited from the general cervical screening population.Methods403 HPV‐positive samples including 113 normal, 173 low‐grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (LG‐CIN), 114 HG‐CIN and three cervical cancers. All samples were assessed by liquid‐based cytology, HPV genotyping and PAX1/SOX1 methylation.Main Outcome MeasuresAUC (area under the curve), sensitivity and specificity for cytology, HPV16/18 genotyping and PAX1/SOX1 methylation for high‐grade (HG) premalignant cervical lesions.ResultsPAX1 was more sensitive than cytology and HPV16/18 genotyping in detecting a HG lesion (CIN2+). The sensitivity for PAX1, SOX1, cytology and HPV16/18 were 73.5% (95% CI: 65.5–81.5), 41.9% (95% CI: 32.9–50.8), 48.7% (95% CI: 39.7–57.8) and 36.8% (95% CI: 28.0–45.5), respectively, and their respective specificities were 70.3% (95% CI: 65.0–75.6), 83.6% (95% CI: 79.3–87.9), 77.6% (95% CI: 72.8–82.5) and 67.1% (95% CI: 61.7–72.6), respectively. Overall, PAX1 gave the best AUC at 0.72. Adding SOX1 to PAX1 did not improve the AUC (0.68). Three hundred and twenty‐two women who did not have a HG lesion at baseline were followed up for two rounds of screening. Fewer women developed a HG lesion with a normal baseline PAX1 compared to women with a normal baseline cytology or negative HPV16/18 (8.4% vs. 14.5% and 17.5%, respectively).ConclusionPAX1 triage for referral to colposcopy in HPV‐positive women may be superior to cytology and HPV16/18 genotyping.

Patient-Initiated Follow-Up in Ovarian Cancer

This study aimed to assess the feasibility of patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU) in combination with regular tumour marker monitoring as an alternative to conventional hospital follow-up for ovarian cancer survivors. Women who had recently completed treatment for ovarian cancer and had a raised pre-treatment tumour marker were recruited. Participants were allocated to PIFU (intervention group) or conventional hospital follow-up (control group) according to their own preference. Both groups had regular tumour marker monitoring. The change in fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) score as measured by the FCR inventory, and the supportive care need (SCN) scores as measured by the SCN survey at baseline and at 6 months between PIFU and hospital follow-up were compared. Out of 64 participants, 37 (58%) opted for hospital follow-up and 27 (42%) opted for PIFU. During the 6-month study period, there was no significant difference in the change of FCR between the two groups (p = 0.35). There was a significant decrease in the sexuality unmet needs score in the intervention group from baseline to 6-month FU (mean difference −8.7, 95% confidence interval −16.1 to −1.4, p = 0.02). PIFU with tumour marker monitoring is a feasible follow-up approach in ovarian cancer survivorship care. FCR and SCN were comparable between PIFU and conventional hospital follow-up.

Tamoxifen use in recurrent ovarian cancer in a Chinese population: A 15 ‐year clinical experience in a tertiary referral center

AbstractAimTo review the clinical use and the effectiveness of tamoxifen in patients with advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer.MethodsA retrospective review of clinical records was conducted in patients who received tamoxifen for the treatment of ovarian cancer between 2002 and 2016. We reviewed the clinical setting that it was given, duration of use, patients' tolerability, clinical benefit and progression‐free survival. We also attempted to identify predictive markers for response.ResultsA total of 92 patients received tamoxifen during this 15‐year period. The patients received a median of 2.5 lines of chemotherapy before switching to tamoxifen, and they remained on tamoxifen for a median of 5.6 months (range 0–85 months), with 24 patients receiving it for more than 12 months. Seventy‐six patients continued on tamoxifen for more than 2 months. In this group, 75 patients had an evaluable response, either by CA 125 or clinically and clinical benefit rate (defined as complete, partial response and static disease) was seen in 42 patients (56%), with majority of patients having static disease. The median progression‐free survival was 5.3 months (95% confidence interval, 2.6–8.1). Tamoxifen was well tolerated. Hormone receptor status was not demonstrated to predict response.ConclusionPatients with advanced ovarian cancer who have failed previous lines of chemotherapy may achieve static disease with tamoxifen with minimal side effects. Tamoxifen may still have a role in the era of molecular target therapy.

Infiltration of T cells promotes the metastasis of ovarian cancer cells via the modulation of metastasis-related genes and PD-L1 expression

Due to its high ability to disseminate, ovarian cancer remains one of the largest threats to women's health, worldwide. Evidence showed that the immune cells infiltrating the tumor microenvironment are crucial in mediating metastasis. Therefore, it is necessary to understand which types of immune cells are involved in metastasis, and to determine the mechanisms by which they influence the process. By immunohistochemistry, we found that higher concentrations of intratumoral CD8

Molecular Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer is the deadliest gynecological cancer, leading to over 152,000 deaths each year. A late diagnosis is the primary factor causing a poor prognosis of ovarian cancer and often occurs due to a lack of specific symptoms and effective biomarkers for an early detection. Currently, cancer antigen 125 (CA125) is the most widely used biomarker for ovarian cancer detection, but this approach is limited by a low specificity. In recent years, multimarker panels have been developed by combining molecular biomarkers such as human epididymis secretory protein 4 (HE4), ultrasound results, or menopausal status to improve the diagnostic efficacy. The risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA), the risk of malignancy index (RMI), and OVA1 assays have also been clinically used with improved sensitivity and specificity. Ongoing investigations into novel biomarkers such as autoantibodies, ctDNAs, miRNAs, and DNA methylation signatures continue to aim to provide earlier detection methods for ovarian cancer. This paper reviews recent advancements in molecular biomarkers for the early detection of ovarian cancer.

Primary HPV testing with cytology versus cytology alone in cervical screening—A prospective randomized controlled trial with two rounds of screening in a Chinese population

We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial with two screening rounds to evaluate the effectiveness of combining HPV testing with liquid‐based cytology (LBC) as a co‐test, compared to LBC only in cervical cancer screening of a Chinese population. First, 15,955 women aged 30–60 were randomized at a 1:1 ratio into an intervention group (Digene Hybrid Capture 2 HPV test with LBC) and a control group (LBC alone). Women in the intervention group would be referred for colposcopy and biopsy immediately if they were found to have high‐risk HPV regardless of cytology results. The detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or above (CIN2+) lesions was significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control (0.95% vs. 0.38%, OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.65–3.88). At the subsequent round of screening approximately 36 months later, CIN2+ detection was significantly lower in the intervention group (0.08% vs. 0.35%, OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.08–0.57). Over the two rounds of screening, the total detection of CIN2+ was higher in the intervention group (1.01% vs. 0.66%, OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.09–2.19). There was a fourfold increase (10.6% vs. 2.4%, p < 0.001) in the number of colposcopies performed in the intervention arm. Adding a high‐risk HPV test to cytology for primary cervical screening led to earlier detection of clinically significant preinvasive lesions, resulting in a reduced detection of CIN2+ lesions in subsequent rounds and an increased rate of colposcopy.

Association between IVIM parameters and treatment response in locally advanced squamous cell cervical cancer treated by chemoradiotherapy

To examine the associations of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) parameters with treatment response in cervical cancer following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Forty-five patients, median age of 58 years (range: 28-82), with pre-CCRT and post-CCRT MRI, were retrospectively analysed. The IVIM parameters pure diffusion coefficient (D) and perfusion fraction (f) were estimated using the full b-value distribution (BVD) as well as an optimised subsample BVD. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to measure observer repeatability in tumour delineation at both time points. Treatment response was determined by the response evaluation criteria in solid tumour (RECIST) 1.1 between MRI examinations. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to test for significant differences in IVIM parameters between treatment response groups. Pre-CCRT tumour delineation repeatability was good (DSC = 0.81) while post-CCRT delineation repeatability was moderate (DSC = 0.67). Values of D and f had good repeatability at both time points (ICC > 0.80). Pre-CCRT f estimated using the full BVD and optimised subsample BVD were found to be significantly higher in patients with partial response compared to those with stable disease or disease progression (p = 0.01 and 95% CI = -0.02-0.00 for both cases). Pre-CCRT f was associated with treatment response in cervical cancer with good observer repeatability. Similar discriminative ability was also observed in estimated pre-CCRT f from an optimised subsample BVD. • Pre-treatment tumour delineation and IVIM parameters had good observer repeatability. • Post-treatment tumour delineation was worse than at pre-treatment, but IVIM parameters retained good ICC. • Pre-treatment perfusion fraction estimated from all b-values and an optimised subsample of b-values were associated with treatment response.

Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampling for Primary Cervical Cancer Screening in Under-Screened Women in Hong Kong during the COVID-19 Pandemic

The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening and the best means of service delivery, with a specific focus on under-screened women, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using three arms of service delivery (social media, school outreach and underserved outreach), we recruited under-screened women aged 30–65 years from two population groups: the general public and specific underserved communities, from whom self-sampled specimens and optional clinician-sampled cervical specimens were obtained for HPV testing. A total of 521 self-sampling kits were distributed, of which 321 were returned, giving an overall uptake rate of 61.6%. The response rate was higher in the face-to-face underserved outreach (65.5%) compared to social media (22.8%) and school outreach (18.2%). The concordance for HPV detection between self-sampled and clinician-sampled specimens was 90.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 85.1–93.8%; Cohen’s kappa 0.59 (95% CI 0.42–0.75)]. Overall, 89.2% of women were willing to have self-sampling again. In conclusion, HPV self-sampling is an effective method for cervical cancer screening and can be considered as an option, particularly in women who are reluctant or unable to attend regular screening. Various service deliveries could be considered to increase participation in cervical cancer screening.