Kara N Maxwell

Exploration of possible association of BRIP1 pathogenic variants with central nervous system cancers in an institutional cohort

BRIP1 (OMIM: 605882), associated with hereditary ovarian cancer, has recently been described in association with central nervous system (CNS) tumours. Institutional germline database review identified 43 families with BRIP1 pathogenic germline variants (PGVs); 7 families (16.3%) reported 8 CNS tumours. Somatic database review identified 1143 individuals with CNS tumours who underwent somatic sequencing, of whom 7 had BRIP1 pathogenic variants (PVs) (0.6%); 1 of 2 germline-tested individuals had a BRIP1 PGV. Though BRIP1 PVs are rare in CNS tumours, a substantial proportion of BRIP1 carriers have a positive family history. Obtaining and documenting the clinical and pathological characteristics of reported CNS tumours in BRIP1 individuals and families is key to exploring a possible association.

Adult-Onset Cancer Predisposition Syndromes in Children and Adolescents—To Test or not to Test?

Abstract With the increasing use of comprehensive germline genetic testing of children and adolescents with cancer, it has become evident that pathogenic variants (PV) in adult-onset cancer predisposition genes (aoCPG) underlying adult-onset cancer predisposition syndromes, such as Lynch syndrome or hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, are enriched and reported in 1% to 2% of children and adolescents with cancer. However, the causal relationship between PVs in aoCPGs and childhood cancer is still under investigation. The best-studied examples include heterozygous PVs in mismatch repair genes associated with Lynch syndrome in children with mismatch repair deficient high-grade glioma, heterozygous PVs in BARD1 in childhood neuroblastoma, and heterozygous PVs in BRCA2 in children with rhabdomyosarcoma. The low penetrance for pediatric cancers is considered to result from a combination of the low baseline risk of cancer in childhood and the report of only a modest relative risk of disease in childhood. Therefore, we do not advise that healthy children empirically be tested for PVs in an aoCPG before adulthood outside a research study. However, germline panel testing is increasingly being performed in children and adolescents with cancer, and exome and genome sequencing may be offered more commonly in this population in the future. The precise pediatric cancer risks and spectra associated with PVs in aoCPGs, underlying cellular mechanisms and somatic mutational signatures, as well as treatment response, second neoplasm risks, and psycho-oncological aspects require further research.

Biallelic BRCA Loss and Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Nonbreast/Ovarian Tumors in Germline BRCA1/2 Carriers

PURPOSE Breast and ovarian tumors in germline BRCA1/2 carriers undergo allele-specific loss of heterozygosity, resulting in homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and sensitivity to poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. This study investigated whether biallelic loss and HRD also occur in primary nonbreast/ovarian tumors that arise in germline BRCA1/2 carriers. METHODS A clinically ascertained cohort of BRCA1/2 carriers with a primary nonbreast/ovarian cancer was identified, including canonical (prostate and pancreatic cancers) and noncanonical (all other) tumor types. Whole-exome sequencing or clinical sequencing results (n = 45) were analyzed. A pan-cancer analysis of nonbreast/ovarian primary tumors from germline BRCA1/2 carriers from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, n = 73) was used as a validation cohort. RESULTS Ages of nonbreast/ovarian cancer diagnosis in germline BRCA1/2 carriers were similar to controls for the majority of cancer types. Nine of 45 (20%) primary nonbreast/ovarian tumors from germline BRCA1/2 carriers had biallelic loss of BRCA1/2 in the clinical cohort, and 23 of 73 (32%) in the TCGA cohort. In the combined cohort, 35% and 27% of primary canonical and noncanonical BRCA tumor types, respectively, had biallelic loss. High HRD scores (HRDex > 42) were detected in 81% of tumors with biallelic BRCA loss compared with 22% ( P < .001) of tumors without biallelic BRCA loss. No differences in genomic profile, including mutational signatures, mutation spectrum, tumor mutational burden, or microsatellite instability, were found in primary nonbreast/ovarian tumors with or without biallelic BRCA1/2 loss. CONCLUSION A proportion of noncanonical primary tumors have biallelic loss and evidence of HRD. Our data suggest that assessment of biallelic loss and HRD could supplement identification of germline BRCA1/2 mutations in selection of patients for platinum or PARP inhibitor therapy.

PTEN Loss and BRCA1 Promoter Hypermethylation Negatively Predict for Immunogenicity in BRCA-Deficient Ovarian Cancer

PURPOSE Ovarian cancers can exhibit a prominent immune infiltrate, but clinical trials have not demonstrated substantive response rates to immune checkpoint blockade monotherapy. We aimed to understand genomic features associated with immunogenicity in BRCA1/2 mutation–associated cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using the Cancer Genome Atlas whole-exome sequencing, methylation, and expression data, we analyzed 66 ovarian cancers with either germline or somatic loss of BRCA1/2 and whole-exome sequencing, immunohistochemistry, and CyTOF in 20 ovarian cancers with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants from Penn. RESULTS We found two groups of BRCA1/2 ovarian cancers differing in their immunogenicity: (1) 37 tumors significantly enriched for PTEN loss (11, 30%) and BRCA1 promoter–hypermethylated (10, 27%; P = .0016) and (2) PTEN wild-type (28 of 29 tumors) cancers, with the latter group having longer overall survival (OS; P = .0186, median OS not reached v median OS = 66.1 months). BRCA1/2-mutant PTEN loss and BRCA1 promoter–hypermethylated cancers were characterized by the decreased composition of lymphocytes estimated by gene expression ( P = .0030), cytolytic index ( P = .034), and cytokine expression but higher homologous recombination deficiency scores ( P = .00013). Large-scale state transitions were the primary discriminating feature ( P = .001); neither mutational burden nor neoantigen burden could explain differences in immunogenicity. In Penn tumors, PTEN loss and high homologous recombination deficiency cancers exhibited fewer CD3+ ( P = .05), CD8+ ( P = .012), and FOXP3+ ( P = .0087) T cells; decreased PRF1 expression ( P = .041); and lower immune costimulatory and inhibitory molecule expression. CONCLUSION Our study suggests that within ovarian cancers with genetic loss of BRCA1/2 are two subsets exhibiting differential immunogenicity, with lower levels associated with PTEN loss and BRCA hypermethylation. These genomic features of BRCA1/2-associated ovarian cancers may inform considerations around how to optimally deploy immune checkpoint inhibitors in the clinic.