Kaoru Okugawa

Current Status of Fertility‐Sparing Treatment for Gynecological Cancers in Japan: A Nationwide Survey

ABSTRACT Aim There is an increasing demand for fertility‐sparing treatment (FST) among young women with gynecological cancer. This study aimed to clarify the current status of FST implementation across Japan by focusing on institutional practice patterns and clinical protocols for cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancers. Methods A nationwide cross‐sectional survey was conducted between August and September 2024. An online questionnaire was distributed to 481 gynecologic tumor registry institutions through the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology mailing list. Data on institutional characteristics, specific FST eligibility criteria, treatment methods, and post‐treatment management were collected. Results Responses were received from 226 institutions (response rate: 47.0%), and all respondent institutions (100%) performed FST for at least one gynecological cancer. Although FST is widely available, significant heterogeneity in clinical protocols was observed across all three cancers. Key variations among respondent institutions included a low implementation rate of radical trachelectomy for cervical cancer (20.8%), a high rate of post‐FST hysterectomy for endometrial cancer (63.6%) compared to cervical cancer and ovarian cancer, and exclusion criteria for patients with hereditary cancer syndromes. Conclusion FST is an established practice in Japan; however, there is a lack of consensus regarding its clinical application. These findings provide a critical benchmark for future efforts to standardize care and develop collaborative networks to optimize this essential treatment modality for young patients with gynecological cancer.

Evaluation of Cervical Cancer Screening in Japan: Challenges and Future Directions for Negative Intraepithelial Lesion or Malignancy/High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Positive Case Management

Cervical cancer screening is crucial for early detection and prevention. In Japan, women with negative intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM) and high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) positivity are recommended retest for 12 months, rather than immediate colposcopy. International guidelines differ, and often prioritize early colposcopy for persistent HPV16/18 infections. This study evaluates Japan’s current screening approach, and identifies areas for improvement. A retrospective cohort study analyzed cervical cancer screening data from Saga Prefecture (2019–2021), assessing follow-up adherence, colposcopy referral rates, and CIN2+ and CIN3+ detection among NILM/HR-HPV+ cases. Among 27,789 individuals screened, 2248 (8.1%) were NILM/HR-HPV+. Follow-up adherence after 12 months was 54.4%. Of these, 132 with cytological abnormalities underwent colposcopy, revealing CIN2+ in 27.3% of cases. Additionally, 561 women with persistent NILM/HR-HPV+ underwent colposcopy, with CIN2+ in 7.6% and CIN3+ in 3.9% of cases. Japan’s current NILM/HR-HPV+ management strategy could delay the detection of high-grade cervical lesions. International guidelines favor earlier colposcopy referrals, particularly for HPV16/18+ cases. To improve cervical cancer prevention, Japan should consider a risk-based stratification model, enhance follow-up adherence, expand colposcopy access, and develop a national patient tracking system. Adopting primary HPV-based screening could attain the best global practices, facilitating earlier detection and reducing cervical cancer.

Evaluation of adjuvant chemotherapy after abdominal trachelectomy for cervical cancer: a single-institution experience

To avoid the loss of fertility, chemotherapy should be chosen as an adjuvant treatment after trachelectomy. Our study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy after abdominal trachelectomy for cervical cancer. Our institutional review board approved this clinical study, and informed consent was obtained from each patient. We began performing abdominal trachelectomy at our institution in 2005. Deep stromal invasion (more than two-thirds) with lymphovascular space invasion, diffuse cervical invasion, skip lesions in the vagina, and lymphovascular space invasion in the cardinal ligament and vagina were defined as intermediate-risk factors, and parametrial invasion and pelvic lymph node metastasis were defined as high-risk factors. Patients who had intermediate- or high-risk factors received post-trachelectomy adjuvant treatment. The medical records and information of the patients were reviewed retrospectively. Through January 2020, we performed 212 trachelectomies. Among the included patients, 16 and 7 patients with intermediate- and high-risk cancer, respectively, received adjuvant chemotherapy after trachelectomy (2 and 21 patients underwent abdominal modified radical trachelectomy and radical trachelectomy, respectively). Among these patients, only one (4.3%) experienced relapse and subsequent death of the disease after a median postoperative follow-up of 80 months (range 12-146 months). The 5-year survival rate was 95.5%. Chemotherapy-related life-threatening acute adverse events were not observed. Persistent ovarian dysfunction and late adverse events did not occur. One woman achieved three pregnancies, and two infants were delivered. Adjuvant chemotherapy after abdominal trachelectomy could be an alternative treatment option from the aspects of effectiveness, safety, and fertility preservation.

Safety evaluation of abdominal trachelectomy in patients with cervical tumors ≥2 cm: a single-institution, retrospective analysis

For oncologic safety, vaginal radical trachelectomy is generally performed only in patients with cervical cancers smaller than 2 cm. However, because inclusion criteria for abdominal trachelectomy are controversial, we evaluated the safety of abdominal trachelectomy for cervical cancers ≥2 cm. We began performing abdominal trachelectomies at our institution in 2005, primarily for squamous cell carcinoma ≤3 cm or adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma ≤2 cm. If a positive sentinel lymph node or cervical margin was diagnosed intraoperatively by frozen section, the trachelectomy was converted to a hysterectomy. Medical records of these patients were reviewed retrospectively. Patients who had undergone simple abdominal trachelectomy were excluded from this study. We attempted trachelectomy in 212 patients. Among the 135 patients with tumors <2 cm, trachelectomy was successful in 120, one of whom developed recurrence and none of whom died of their disease. Among 77 patients with tumors ≥2 cm, trachelectomy was successful in 62, 2 of whom developed recurrence and 1 of whom died of her disease. The overall relapse rate after trachelectomy was 1.6% (0.8% in <2 cm group and 3.2% in ≥2 cm group), and the mortality rate was 0.5% (0% in <2 cm group and 1.6% in ≥2 cm group). Recurrence-free survival (p=0.303) and overall survival (p=0.193) did not differ significantly between the <2 cm and ≥2 cm groups. Abdominal trachelectomy with intraoperative frozen sections of sentinel lymph nodes and cervical margins is oncologically safe, even in patients with tumors ≥2 cm.

Are HPV‐negative lesions concerned for the introduction of primary HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in Japan?

AbstractAimIn Japan, primary human papilloma virus (HPV) testing has not been introduced for cervical cancer screening due to concerns that HPV‐negative lesions may be missed and a lack of Japanese data. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of primary HPV testing in Japan by analyzing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 (CIN2) or more/high‐risk HPV− (CIN2+/hrHPV−) cases in cervical cancer screening.MethodsData from 35 525 cervical cancer screenings with HPV testing and cervical cytology from 2011 to 2019 in Saga City, Japan, were reviewed. The cases with low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL+)/hrHPV− were analyzed in detail.ResultsThe results of the 35 525 examinees were as follows: 31 123 were negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM)/hrHPV–, 2612 were NILM/hrHPV+, 262 were atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC‐US)/hrHPV–, 213 were ASC‐US/hrHPV+, 291 were LSIL+/hrHPV−, and 1024 were LSIL+/hrHPV+. Of the 256 LSIL+/hrHPV− examinees for whom histology was available, CIN2+ were CIN2 9.4% (24/256), CIN3 3.9% (10/256), cervical adenocarcinoma 0.4% (1/256), uterine corpus cancer 1.2% (3/256), and uterine sarcoma 0.4% (1/256). Overall, the rate of LSIL+/hrHPV− was 0.82% (291/35.525), 0.1% (36/35525) of which were cervical lesions with CIN2+. Only one cervical adenocarcinoma was detected, but gastric‐type adenocarcinoma was not included.ConclusionHPV‐negative CIN2+ or cervical adenocarcinoma is not a concern for the introduction of primary HPV screening in Japan. Primary HPV testing in cervical cancer screening is considered a feasible method that can be used in Japan, although an algorithm suitable for Japan and a national‐level management system need to be established.