Investigator

K Sundfeldt

Professor/Consultant · University of Gothenburg, Obstetrics and Gynecology

KSK Sundfeldt
Papers(5)
Genomic alterations i…Optimization of Pre-A…Sulfation of O-glycan…Diagnostic potential …Concurrent RB1 Loss a…
Collaborators(10)
Laura TwomeyLinda E. KelemenLinda S. CookLynne R WilkensMadeleine Courtney-Br…Marcin LenerMarc T. GoodmanMarjorie J. RigganMark E. ShermanMartin Köbel
Institutions(11)
University Of Gothenb…Peter Maccallum Cance…Musc Hollings Cancer …University of Colorad…University of Hawaii …University Of Pittsbu…International Heredit…Cedars Sinai Medical …Duke Medical CenterMayo ClinicUniversity of Calgary

Papers

Genomic alterations in ovarian endometriosis and subsequently diagnosed ovarian carcinoma

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Can the alleged association between ovarian endometriosis and ovarian carcinoma be substantiated by genetic analysis of endometriosis diagnosed prior to the onset of the carcinoma? SUMMARY ANSWER The data suggest that ovarian carcinoma does not originate from ovarian endometriosis with a cancer-like genetic profile; however, a common precursor is probable. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Endometriosis has been implicated as a precursor of ovarian carcinoma based on epidemiologic studies and the discovery of common driver mutations in synchronous disease at the time of surgery. Endometrioid ovarian carcinoma and clear cell ovarian carcinoma are the most common endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas (EAOCs). STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION The pathology biobanks of two university hospitals in Sweden were scrutinized to identify women with surgically removed endometrioma who subsequently developed ovarian carcinoma (1998–2016). Only 45 archival cases with EAOC and previous endometriosis were identified and after a careful pathology review, 25 cases were excluded due to reclassification into non-EAOC (n = 9) or because ovarian endometriosis could not be confirmed (n = 16). Further cases were excluded due to insufficient endometriosis tissue or poor DNA quality in either the endometriosis, carcinoma, or normal tissue (n = 9). Finally 11 cases had satisfactory DNA from all three locations and were eligible for further analysis. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Epithelial cells were collected from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections by laser capture microdissection (endometrioma n = 11) or macrodissection (carcinoma n = 11) and DNA was extracted. Normal tissue from FFPE sections (n = 5) or blood samples collected at cancer diagnosis (n = 6) were used as the germline controls for each included patient. Whole-exome sequencing was performed (n = 33 samples). Somatic variants (single-nucleotide variants, indels, and copy number alterations) were characterized, and mutational signatures and kataegis were assessed. Microsatellite instability and mismatch repair status were confirmed with PCR and immunohistochemistry, respectively. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The median age for endometriosis surgery was 42 years, and 54 years for the subsequent ovarian carcinoma diagnosis. The median time between the endometriosis and ovarian carcinoma was 10 (7–30) years. The data showed that all paired samples harbored one or more shared somatic mutations. Non-silent mutations in cancer-associated genes were frequent in endometriosis; however, the same mutations were never observed in subsequent carcinomas. The degree of clonal dominance, demonstrated by variant allele frequency, showed a positive correlation with the time to cancer diagnosis (Spearman’s rho 0.853, P < 0.001). Mutations in genes associated with immune escape were the most conserved between paired samples, and regions harboring these genes were frequently affected by copy number alterations in both sample types. Mutational burdens and mutation signatures suggested faulty DNA repair mechanisms in all cases. LARGE SCALE DATA Datasets are available in the supplementary tables. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Even though we located several thousands of surgically removed endometriomas between 1998 and 2016, only 45 paired samples were identified and even fewer, 11 cases, were eligible for sequencing. The observed high level of intra- and inter-heterogeneity in both groups (endometrioma and carcinoma) argues for further studies of the alleged genetic association. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The observation of shared somatic mutations in all paired samples supports a common cellular origin for ovarian endometriosis and ovarian carcinoma. However, contradicting previous conclusions, our data suggest that cancer-associated mutations in endometriosis years prior to the carcinoma were not directly associated with the malignant transformation. Rather, a resilient ovarian endometriosis may delay tumorigenesis. Furthermore, the data indicate that genetic alterations affecting the immune response are early and significant events. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The present work has been funded by the Sjöberg Foundation (2021-01145 to K.S.; 2022-01-11:4 to A.S.), Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils, the ALF-agreement (965552 to K.S.; 40615 to I.H.; 965065 to A.S.), Swedish Cancer Society (21-1848 to K.S.; 21-1684 to I.H.; 22-2080 to A.S.), BioCARE—A Strategic Research Area at Lund University (I.H. and S.W.-F.), Mrs Berta Kamprad’s Cancer Foundation (FBKS-2019-28, I.H.), Cancer and Allergy Foundation (10381, I.H.), Region Västra Götaland (A.S.), Sweden’s Innovation Agency (2020-04141, A.S.), Swedish Research Council (2021-01008, A.S.), Roche in collaboration with the Swedish Society of Gynecological Oncology (S.W.-F.), Assar Gabrielsson Foundation (FB19-86, C.M.), and the Lena Wäpplings Foundation (C.M.). A.S. declares stock ownership and is also a board member in Tulebovaasta, SiMSen Diagnostics, and Iscaff Pharma. A.S. has also received travel support from EMBL, Precision Medicine Forum, SLAS, and bioMCC. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Optimization of Pre-Analytical Handling to Maintain DNA Integrity in Diagnostic Papanicolaou Tests

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) of ovarian carcinoma origin can be detected in samples from the gynecologic tract. This study aims to evaluate how pre-analytical handling affects DNA profile and integrity in Papanicolaou (Pap) tests, to optimize their potential for detection of ovarian cancers (OCs). Analysis of archived Pap tests from patients with OC, kept at room temperature for 48 hours and stored at -80°C, was complemented by in vitro experiments. Temperature-associated effects on DNA fragmentation were evaluated in samples stored at 4°C, -20°C, or -80°C. Time-dependent DNA degradation at room temperature was evaluated in comparison to storage at 4°C. Results were validated in prospectively collected Pap tests. The DNA integrity was assessed by fragment analysis. Accumulation of short DNA fragments was observed in archived Pap tests from patients with OC. In vitro, fragments of 100 to 350 bp increased 11.5-fold within 48 hours at room temperature compared with 1.7-fold when stored at 4°C. Consistent with the in vitro findings, prospectively collected samples showed reduced fragmentation when stored at 4°C compared with room temperature (P = 0.007). Long-term storage at 4°C had a significant negative effect on DNA stability (P = 0.013), whereas freezing slowed down fragmentation. Immediate storage at 4°C after sampling markedly reduces DNA degradation, suggesting a simple way to optimize pre-analytical handling and decrease unwanted fragmentation for cfDNA analysis in Pap tests.

Concurrent RB1 Loss and BRCA Deficiency Predicts Enhanced Immunologic Response and Long-term Survival in Tubo-ovarian High-grade Serous Carcinoma

Abstract Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate RB1 expression and survival across ovarian carcinoma histotypes and how co-occurrence of BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) alterations and RB1 loss influences survival in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). Experimental Design: RB1 protein expression was classified by immunohistochemistry in ovarian carcinomas of 7,436 patients from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium. We examined RB1 expression and germline BRCA status in a subset of 1,134 HGSC, and related genotype to overall survival (OS), tumor-infiltrating CD8+ lymphocytes, and transcriptomic subtypes. Using CRISPR-Cas9, we deleted RB1 in HGSC cells with and without BRCA1 alterations to model co-loss with treatment response. We performed whole-genome and transcriptome data analyses on 126 patients with primary HGSC to characterize tumors with concurrent BRCA deficiency and RB1 loss. Results: RB1 loss was associated with longer OS in HGSC but with poorer prognosis in endometrioid ovarian carcinoma. Patients with HGSC harboring both RB1 loss and pathogenic germline BRCA variants had superior OS compared with patients with either alteration alone, and their median OS was three times longer than those without pathogenic BRCA variants and retained RB1 expression (9.3 vs. 3.1 years). Enhanced sensitivity to cisplatin and paclitaxel was seen in BRCA1-altered cells with RB1 knockout. Combined RB1 loss and BRCA deficiency correlated with transcriptional markers of enhanced IFN response, cell-cycle deregulation, and reduced epithelial–mesenchymal transition. CD8+ lymphocytes were most prevalent in BRCA-deficient HGSC with co-loss of RB1. Conclusions: Co-occurrence of RB1 loss and BRCA deficiency was associated with exceptionally long survival in patients with HGSC, potentially due to better treatment response and immune stimulation.

13Works
5Papers
106Collaborators

Positions

Professor/Consultant

University of Gothenburg · Obstetrics and Gynecology