Josep Maria Sole-Sedeno

Influence of Age on Treatment and Prognosis in Ovarian Cancer Patients

Background: Ovarian cancer, particularly in advanced stages, requires cytoreductive surgery followed by chemotherapy. A significant proportion of patients are elderly, yet older women are often treated with non-standard regimens despite a lack of consistent evidence linking age to prognosis. The aim of this study is to assess age-specific differences in treatment and survival outcomes for ovarian cancer in women aged 70 years or older. Methods: This retrospective study included ovarian cancer patients treated at the Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, between 2016 and 2022. Patients were stratified into two groups: <70 and ≥70 years. Clinical and pathological data were analyzed, and hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Multivariate analysis was performed to compare outcomes. Results: A total of 110 patients were included (73 <70 years, 37 ≥70 years). Among the older group, 80.5% were diagnosed at advanced stages (III–IV), compared to 63% in the younger group (p = 0.012). Patients aged ≥70 were more likely to undergo interval surgery (p = 0.053) and receive non-standard treatment (p = 0.023). Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 95.8% of younger patients versus 81.3% of older patients (p = 0.024). Age ≥70 did not significantly impact DFS (p = 0.091), but OS was significantly worse in the older group (44.4% vs. 67.2%, p = 0.014). Conclusions: Older women (≥70 years) with ovarian cancer are more likely to be diagnosed at advanced stages, receive non-standard treatment, and achieve suboptimal cytoreduction compared to younger patients. While DFS was similar across age groups, older age was associated with worse OS, highlighting the need for age-tailored treatment strategies.

Influence of age on treatment and prognosis of invasive cervical cancer

Invasive cervical cancer is considered a young women's disease, however up to 20 % of cases develop cervical cancer at advanced ages. The aim was to characterize invasive cervical cancer in women aged 65 and older assessing age-specific survival differences. A retrospective study including cervical cancer patients was conducted at Hospital del Mar Barcelona from July-2007 to December-2016. Women were stratified: <65 or ≥65years. Clinical and pathological data were collected. Multivariate analysis was used to compare outcomes. Adjusted hazard ratios with 95 % confidence intervals for disease-free survival, and overall survival were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. 124 patients with invasive cervical cancer (n = 87 < 65years and n = 37 ≥ 65years) were included. At diagnosis, 48.3 % of <65years patients were diagnosed at advanced stages, while 64.9 % in ≥65years (p = 0.018). Standard treatment was given to 83.9 % of patients in <65years group compared to 62.2 % in ≥65years (p = 0.015). Disease-free survival and overall survival showed no significant differences between groups. Age ≥65 did not predict worse disease-free survival (HR: 0.3 95 %CI, 0.04-3.1, p = 0.347) or overall survival (HR: 0.82 95 %CI, 0.3-2.3, p = 0.729). Invasive cervical cancer was diagnosed at advanced stages and was treated less frequently with radical intention in patients ≥65years; overall survival and disease-free survival were similar to those cervical cancer diagnosed at younger ages.

Pre-operative impact of multimodal prehabilitation in gynecologic oncology patients

Multimodal prehabilitation is a multi-disciplinary program that includes exercise, nutrition, and psychological intervention before surgery to improve pre-operative functional capacity. This study aims to assess the impact of a prehabilitation program on the pre-operative functional status of gynecologic oncology patients. This single-center, prospective observational study included all consecutive patients diagnosed with gynecologic cancer who were scheduled for surgery and enrolled in a structured prehabilitation program from January 2018 to May 2024. Only patients with both baseline and pre-operative evaluations were included. Functional status data were compared before (baseline) and after (pre-operative) the prehabilitation intervention. The primary outcome measured was functional capacity, as determined by the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). Secondary outcomes included hand grip strength, the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) score, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score. The type of training and adherence were also evaluated. A total of 77 patients underwent both baseline and pre-operative evaluation at the prehabilitation unit. The median duration of the program was 25.2 days (range; 9-63). Significant pre-operative improvements were observed in 6MWT (baseline: 435.7 m, standard deviation [SD] = 115.9 vs pre-operative: 455.7 m, SD = 118.9, p < .001), hand grip strength (baseline: 19.0 kg, SD = 5.5 vs pre-operative: 20.4 kg, SD = 5.9, p = .012), MUST score (baseline MUST ≥2 in 14.3% patients vs pre-operative 3.9%, p = .03), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score (baseline anxiety score: 7.4, SD = 4.3 vs pre-operative: 6.3, SD = 3.6, p < .001; and baseline depression score: 5.5, SD = 4.2 vs pre-operative: 4.3, SD = 3.6, p < .001). Among the different training programs, patients participating in supervised CrossFit training showed greater improvement in the 6MWT (33.4 m), compared to the hospital-supervised group (27.1 m), and the non-supervised home training group (14.0 m). A structured multimodal prehabilitation program improves pre-operative functional capacity in gynecologic oncology patients, with the greatest improvements seen in those who participated in supervised high-intensity training, such as CrossFit.