JPJonathan Peralta
Papers(6)
Sentinel lymph node a…Management of invasiv…Gastrointestinal stro…Oncological impact of…Morbidity of radical …Pelvic lymph node inv…
Collaborators(10)
Rene ParejaDavid Viveros-CarreñoSantiago Vieira-SernaJuliana RodriguezMarcela NúñezMónica GilNathalia Mora‐SotoCarolina Morante‐Caic…Gabriel RendonJairo Alonso Hernández
Institutions(3)
Instituto Nacional De…AUNA Las americasClínica Las Américas

Papers

Management of invasive cervical carcinoma in three oncology centers in Latin America: A historical cohort study

Abstract Objective To describe clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of patients with invasive cervical cancer treated at three oncology centers in Latin America, as well as their risk factors, and management based on the FIGO stage 2009. Methods This is a descriptive historical cohort study of patients with invasive cervical cancer recruited between January 2010 and June 2016. The study describes demographic characteristics, risk factors, treatments, and oncological outcomes at 1 and 5 years. Results A total of 717 patients were included: 433 (60.39%) from INC Colombia, 174 (24.26%) from INCAN Mexico, and 110 (15.34%) from INEN Peru. Most patients were at FIGO Stage 2009 IIB 213 (29.70%), and the most common histologic subtype was squamous cell carcinoma 550 (76.71%). Concurrent chemo‐radiotherapy was the most frequent approach 334 (46.48%), followed by surgical treatment 261 (36.40%) patients. Regarding oncological outcomes, the 5‐year disease‐free survival (DFS) for all patients was 76.72% (95% CI: 73.34%–80.18%), with worse outcomes observed for Stages III and IV compared to early stages. The 5‐year overall survival (OS) for the general group was 83.76% (95% CI: 81.00%–86.73%), with statistically significant differences showing better outcomes for Stage I, with an OS of 94.52% (95% CI: 91.68–97.44). Conclusion In this descriptive historical cohort, most patients received treatment according to their clinical stage. Survival rates, both overall and disease‐free, were better for early‐stage disease compared to advanced stages.

Morbidity of radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy in cervical cancer

AbstractCervical cancer is among the most common cancers affecting women worldwide. The standard treatment for early‐stage cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] 2018 stages IA1–IB2, IIA1) typically involves a radical or simple hysterectomy with lymph node assessment. Postoperative management may include observation or tailored adjuvant therapy, such as radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, depending on individual pathological risk factors. However, these interventions are associated with significant complications: surgical management can lead to urinary and sexual dysfunction, lymphocysts, and lower limb lymphedema, while radiotherapy may cause genitourinary, gastrointestinal, and sexual toxicities. Less‐radical surgery for selected cases could reduce surgical morbidity and advances in radiotherapy techniques, such as intensity‐modulated radiotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, and other three‐dimensional conformal radiation therapies, have the potential to enhance precision and reduce toxicity. Nonetheless, the morbidity associated with combining radical surgery and adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy remains an area of uncertainty, particularly in light of these emerging technologies. Most current data on this topic derive from retrospective studies involving heterogeneous populations and inconsistent quality‐of‐life assessment methods. Prospective studies employing standardized morbidity assessment tools are essential to determine the true impact of combined treatments compared to single‐modality approaches. Future research should prioritize understanding the long‐term effects of these treatment strategies, aiming to minimize adverse outcomes while maintaining optimal oncological control.

Pelvic lymph node involvement and risk of recurrence in HPV‐associated endocervical adenocarcinoma stage IA2‐IB1 according to Silva's system in two Colombian cancer centers

AbstractObjectiveTo compare the pelvic lymph node involvement and risk of recurrence in patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)‐associated endocervical adenocarcinoma stage IA2‐IB1 undergoing hysterectomy and/or trachelectomy plus lymphadenectomy, according to Silva's classification system.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed in two Colombian cancer centers. The cases were classified according to the Silva classification system. Clinical, surgical, and histopathological variables were evaluated. Recurrence risk was analyzed by patterns A, B, or C. A logistic regression model was performed for tumor recurrence. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate overall survival and disease‐free survival (DFS). A weighted kappa was performed to determine the degree of concordance between pathologists.ResultsA total of 100 patients were identified, 33% pattern A, 29% pattern B, and 38% pattern C. The median follow‐up time was 42.5 months. No evidence of lymph node involvement was found in patients classified as A and B, while in the C pattern was observed in 15.8% (n = 6) of cases (P < 0.01). There were 7% of cases with recurrent disease, of which 71.5% corresponded to type C pattern. Patients with Silva pattern B and C had 1.22‐ and 4.46‐fold increased risk of relapse, respectively, compared with pattern A. The 5‐year DFS values by group were 100%, 96.1%, and 80.3% for patterns A, B, and C, respectively.ConclusionFor patients with early‐stage HPV‐associated endocervical adenocarcinoma, the type C pattern presented more lymph node involvement and risk of recurrence compared to the A and B patterns. The concordance in diagnosis of different Silva's patterns by independents pathologists were good.

10Works
6Papers
13Collaborators

Education

Gynecologic Oncology

Instituto Nacional de Cancerología

Master in Epidemiology

Pontificia Universidad Javeriana