Investigator

John Condon

Principle Research Fellow · Menzies School of Health Research, Epidemiology and Health Services Division

JCJohn Condon
Papers(1)
Temporal and area-lev…
Collaborators(2)
Peter BaadeGail Garvey
Institutions(3)
Menzies School Of Hea…Cancer Council Queens…University of Queensl…

Papers

Temporal and area-level variation in prevalence of high-grade histologically confirmed cervical abnormalities among Indigenous and non-Indigenous women, Queensland, Australia, 2008–2017

Objective Despite Australia’s National Cervical Screening Program, Indigenous women have a disproportionately high burden of cervical cancer. We describe temporal and area-level patterns in prevalence of histologically conformed high-grade cervical abnormalities (hHGA) among cytologically screened women by Indigenous status. Methods This was a population-based study of 2,132,925 women, aged 20–69, who underwent cervical screening between 2008 and 2017, in Queensland, Australia. Of these, 47,136 were identified as Indigenous from linked hospital records. Overall patterns in hHGA prevalence by Indigenous status were quantified using prevalence rate ratios (PrRR) from negative binomial models. Bayesian spatial models were used to obtain smoothed prevalence estimates of hHGA across 528 small areas compared to the state average. Results are presented as maps and graphs showing the associated uncertainty of the estimates. Results Overall, screened Indigenous women had significantly higher hHGA prevalence than non-Indigenous women. However, the magnitude of the difference reduced over time ( p  < 0.001). Adjusted for age and area-level variables, Indigenous women had 36% higher hHGA prevalence (PrRR 1.36, 95% confidence interval [1.21–1.52]) than non-Indigenous women between 2013 and 2017. The overall effect of age decreased over time ( p  = 0.021). Although there was evidence of moderate spatial variation in 10-year prevalence estimates for both groups of women, the high levels of uncertainty for many estimates, particularly for Indigenous women, limited our ability to draw definitive conclusions about the spatial patterns. Conclusions While the temporal reduction in Indigenous: non-Indigenous differential in hHGA prevalence is encouraging, further research into the key drivers of the continuing higher risk among Indigenous women is warranted.

66Works
1Papers
2Collaborators
Early Detection of CancerPapillomavirus InfectionsPrecancerous ConditionsNeoplasms

Positions

2000–

Principle Research Fellow

Menzies School of Health Research · Epidemiology and Health Services Division

1992–

Senior Medical Epidemiologist

Northern Territory Department of Health · Health Gains Planning Branch

Education

2004

PhD

Charles Darwin University · Menzies School of Health Research

1995

Cert Hth Ec

Monash University

1992

MPH

Harvard University · Harvard School of Public Health

1991

FAFPHM

Royal Australasian College of Physicians · Faculty of Public Health Medicine

1986

DTM&H

University of London · London School of Hygeine and Tropical Health

1983

DipRACOG

Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists

1980

MBBS

Monash University

Country

AU