Novel T2 Mapping for Evaluating Cervical Cancer Features by Providing Quantitative T2 Maps and Synthetic Morphologic Images: A Preliminary Study
BackgroundThe application value of T2 mapping in evaluating cervical cancer (CC) features remains unclear.PurposeTo investigate the role of T2 values in evaluating CC classification, grade, and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) in comparison to apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and to compare synthetic T2‐weighted (T2W) images calculated from T2 values to conventional T2W images for CC staging.Study TypeRetrospective.PopulationSixty‐three patients with histopathologically confirmed CC.Field Strength/Sequence3T, conventional T2W turbo spin‐echo, diffusion‐weighted echo‐planar, and accelerated T2 mapping sequence.AssessmentT2 and ADC values between different pathological features of CC were compared. The diagnostic accuracies of conventional and synthetic T2W images in staging were also compared.Statistical TestsParameters were compared using an independent t‐test, Wilcoxon signed‐rank test, and the chi‐square test. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed.ResultsThe T2 values varied significantly between well/moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated tumors ([92.8 ± 9.5 msec] vs. [83.8 ± 9.5 msec], P < 0.05) and between LVSI‐positive and LVSI‐negative CC ([82.2 ± 8.2 msec] vs. [93.9 ± 9.1 msec], P < 0.05). The ADC values showed a significant difference for grade ([0.76 ± 0.10 × 10−3 mm2/s] vs. [0.65 ± 0.11 × 10−3 mm2/s], P < 0.05) and no difference for LVSI status ([0.71 ± 0.11× 10−3 mm2/s] vs. [0.73 ± 0.12× 10−3 mm2/s], P = 0.472). There was no significant difference in T2 and ADC values between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma (P = 0.378 and P = 0.661, respectively). In MRI staging, the conventional and synthetic T2W images resulted in a similar accuracy (71% vs. 68%, P = 0.698).Data ConclusionThe accelerated T2 mapping sequence may facilitate grading and staging of CC by providing quantitative T2 maps and synthetic T2W images in one acquisition. T2 values may be superior to ADC in predicting LVSI.Level of Evidence2Technical Efficacy Stage2 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2020;52:1859–1869.
