Investigator

JingJing Liu

Catholic University Of Korea

JLJingJing Liu
Papers(3)
Peripheral blood<i>BR…Genomic, transcriptom…Comparison of the saf…
Collaborators(10)
Myungshin KimSanha LeeSoo Young HurWeiguo LuXiaoyun WanYedan ZhuYoun Jin ChoiYuanming ShenYu WangYuyeon Jung
Institutions(3)
Catholic University O…Women's Hospital Scho…Taichung Veterans Gen…

Papers

Genomic, transcriptomic, and viral integration profiles associated with recurrent/metastatic progression in high‐risk human papillomavirus cervical carcinomas

AbstractAcquisition of recurrent/metastatic potential by a tumor cell defines a critical step in malignant progression. However, understanding of metastatic progression at the molecular level is scarce for cervical carcinomas (CES). In this study, we performed genomic, transcriptomic, and viral profiling of five pairs of primary (CES‐P) and matched recurrent/metastatic tumors (CES‐R/M) with high risk human papillomavirus. Whole exome sequencing revealed mutation features of CES‐R/M including elevated mutation burdens and prevalent copy number alterations compared to their matched CES‐P. A relative deficit of APOBEC‐related mutation signatures accompanying the transcriptional downregulation ofAPOBEC3Awas observed for CES‐R/M. Mutations in genes encoding epigenetic regulators were commonly observed as CES‐R/M‐specific alterations. Immunoprofiling and gene set analysis revealed CES‐Ps were enriched with transcripts representing activated anticancer immunity such as interferon‐gamma pathway, while CES‐R/M exhibited upregulation of genes involved in epithelial‐mesenchymal transition and angiogenesis. Viral capture sequencing revealed that integration sites remained enriched in viral E1 protein domain during malignant progression. Moreover, we found transcriptional upregulation ofPOSTNand downregulation ofAPOBEC3Awere associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes in CES. Comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic profiling of a rare cohort including CES‐R/M identified metastases‐specific features to advance the molecular understanding into CES metastatic progression with potential clinical implications.

Comparison of the safety between cervical conization and hysterectomy for patients with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ

To compare the safety between cervical conization (CC) alone and hysterectomy for patients with adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) of the cervix. Patients diagnosed with AIS after CC during 2007-2021 were identified by computerized databases at Women's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine. A total of 453 AIS patients were divided into 2 groups according to uterus preservation: hysterectomy group (n=300) and CC(s) alone group (n=153). The prevalence of residual disease and disease recurrence was compared between patients treated by CC(s) alone and hysterectomy. The prevalence of residual disease in specimens from women who had a hysterectomy and repeat CC were compared between positive and negative margins of CC. The factors influencing residual disease and disease recurrence were assessed. Among 310 specimens from women who had a hysterectomy or repeat CC, the prevalence of residual disease was 50.6% (45/89) for a positive margin and 2.3% (5/221) for a negative margin (p=0.000). Four patients had recurrence of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia in those treated by hysterectomy and one had recurrence of cervical squamous intraepithelial neoplasia in those treated by CC(s) alone. The prevalence of recurrence was 0.7% (1/153) for CC(s) alone and 1.3% (4/300) for hysterectomy (p=0.431). Hysterectomy did not influence residual disease or disease recurrence. CC is an efficacious and safe option for patients with AIS of the cervix provided the margin is negative.

3Papers
12Collaborators