Investigator

Jiheum Paek

Assistant professor · Ajou University Hospital, Obstetrics and gynecology

JPJiheum Paek
Papers(3)
Minimally invasive su…Oncologic and Operati…Selection criteria an…
Collaborators(6)
Joo-Hyuk SonSuk-Joon ChangTae-Wook KongJimin LeeHee-Sug RyuJeeyeon Kim
Institutions(1)
Ajou University

Papers

Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery in advanced stage endometrial cancer

AbstractAimStaging surgery in early stage endometrial cancer has been shown to be feasible and safe with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in many previous studies. However, there is limited literature on MIS's safety in advanced stages. This study aims to identify factors associated with survival in stage III endometrial cancer and investigate survival differences based on surgical approach.MethodsPatients with stage III endometrial cancer who underwent staging surgery from March 2002 to March 2023 were included in this study. Various clinicopathological features, disease‐free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.ResultsAmong the 79 patients included in this study, 20 patients underwent MIS (25.3%) and 59 patients underwent open surgery (74.7%). The open surgery group had a higher prevalence of aggressive histology, a higher median pretreatment CA‐125 level, and a greater number of harvested lymph nodes compared to the MIS group. Five‐year OS and DFS was higher in the open surgery group than in the MIS group (DFS: 67.9% vs. 59.9%, p = 0.046; OS: 74.3 vs. 50.6%, p = 0.008). In multivariate analysis, younger than 55 years old (OR, 2.778; 95% CI, 1.078–7.156; p = 0.034), and open surgery (OR, 3.671; 95% CI, 1.581–8.522; p = 0.002) was related to improved OS.ConclusionsOpen staging surgery showed better survival outcomes when compared to MIS in stage III endometrial cancer patients in our study. For patients who are older than 55 years old and have aggressive histology in endometrial biopsy, considering open surgery may help improve their prognosis, even if preoperative MRI suggests early‐stage endometrial cancer.

Oncologic and Operative Outcomes of Robotic Staging Surgery Using Low Pelvic Port Placement in High-Risk Endometrial Cancer

Upper para-aortic lymph node dissection (PALND) is one of the most challenging gynecologic robotic procedures. This study aimed to evaluate the oncologic and operative outcomes of robotic staging surgery, including upper PALND, using low pelvic port placement (LP3) in 22 patients with high-risk endometrial cancer. High-risk was defined as patients who showed deep myometrial invasion with grade III, cervical involvement, or high-risk histology. The mean patient age and body mass index were 58 years and 24 kg/m2. The mean operative time was 263 min. The mean number of total LNs and upper PALNs obtained was 31 and 10. Two patients received lymphangiography to reduce the amount of drained lymphatic fluid after surgery. The recurrence rate was 13.6% (3/22). There were two LN recurrences and one at the peritoneum in the intra-abdominal cavity. Robotic staging surgery using LP3 was feasible for performing PALND as well as procedures in the pelvic cavity simultaneously. It provides important techniques for performing optimal surgical procedures when surgeons decide to perform comprehensive PALND in instances of isolated recurrence or unexpected LN enlargement as well as high-risk endometrial cancer. Consequently, surgeons can achieve surgical consistency and reproducibility for PALND, leading to improved operative and survival outcomes in high-risk endometrial cancer.

Selection criteria and colpotomic approach for safe minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer

To evaluate oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (RH) in early cervical cancer before and after the application of parametrial invasion (PMI) criterion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and vaginal colpotomy (VC). A total of 216 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB-IIA cervical cancer patients who underwent minimally invasive RH was identified between April 2006 and October 2018. Patients were classified into the pre-PMI intracorporeal or VC (IVC) (n=117) and post-PMI VC groups (n=99). In the pre-PMI IVC group, PMI criterion (intact stromal ring) on MRI was not applied and the patients received IVC. In the post-PMI VC group, surgical candidates were selected using the PMI criterion on MRI and all patients received VC only. Oncologic outcomes and prognostic factors associated with disease recurrence were analyzed. The rate of positive vaginal cuff margins in the pre-PMI IVC group was higher than that in the post-PMI VC group (11.1% vs. 1.0%, p=0.003). Two-year disease-free survival was different between the 2 groups (84.5% in pre-PMI IVC vs. 98.0% in post-PMI VC groups, p=0.005). Disrupted stromal ring on MRI (hazard ratio [HR]=20.321; 95% confidence interval [CI]=4.903-84.218; p<0.001) and intracorporeal colpotomy (HR=3.059; 95% CI=1.176-7.958; p=0.022) were associated with recurrence. The intact cervical stromal ring on MRI might identify the low-risk group of patients in terms of PMI and lymphovascular/stromal invasion in early cervical cancer. Minimally invasive RH should be performed in optimal candidates with an intact stromal ring on MRI, using VC.

16Works
3Papers
6Collaborators
Endometrial NeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingDisease-Free SurvivalOvarian NeoplasmsCarcinoma, EndometrioidNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalUterine Cervical NeoplasmsUterine Neoplasms

Positions

Assistant professor

Ajou University Hospital · Obstetrics and gynecology