Jie V. Zhao

Using Genetics to Assess the Role of Acetate in Ischemic Heart Disease, Diabetes, and Sex-Hormone-Related Cancers: A Mendelian Randomization Study

Background: Acetate, a short-chain fatty acid, has gained attention for its contrasting roles, with evidence suggesting it may offer cardiovascular protection but also promote cancer, particularly those involving sex hormones. However, these influences have been scarcely assessed in epidemiological research. Objective: To investigate the relationship between acetate and ischemic heart disease (IHD), diabetes, and cancers related to sex hormones. Methods: Mendelian randomization (MR) was used to assess potential causal effects, selecting genetic variants without linkage disequilibrium (r2 < 0.001) and with genome-wide significance for acetate (p < 5 × 10−8). These variants were applied to large genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for ischemic heart disease (IHD; up to 154,373 cases), diabetes (109,731 cases), and five sex-hormone-related cancers (breast, colorectal, prostate, ovarian, and endometrial cancers, ranging from 8679 to 122,977 cases). We employed various methods for analysis, including penalized inverse variance weighting (pIVW), inverse variance weighting, weighted mode, and weighted median. Results: This study indicates that acetate may be associated with a lower risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD), with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.62 per standard deviation (SD) increase in acetate and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.39 to 0.98. Additionally, acetate was linked to a higher breast cancer risk, with an OR of 1.26 and a 95% CI ranging from 1.08 to 1.46. This association remained robust across multiple sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: Acetate, along with factors that influence its activity, may serve as possible targets for breast cancer treatment and possibly IHD, offering opportunities for new drug development.

Genetic proxies for calcium channel blockers and cancer: a Mendelian randomization study

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are commonly prescribed antihypertensives. However, concerns exist about potential off-target effects on cancer. This Mendelian randomization (MR) study examined the associations of genetic proxies for CCBs with the risk of cancer. We used published genetic proxies in the target genes of CCBs as instruments, and obtained MR estimates by applying them to large studies of 17 site-specific cancers (non-Hodgkin lymphoma, melanoma, leukemia, thyroid, rectal, pancreatic, oral cavity/pharyngeal, kidney, esophagus/stomach, colon, bladder, endometrial, cervical and breast, prostate, lung and ovarian cancer) from the Pan-Cancer study, with replication for breast cancer (133,384 cases, 113,789 controls from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium), prostate cancer (79,148 cases, 61,106 controls from the Prostate Cancer Association Group to Investigate Cancer Associated Alterations in the Genome consortium), lung cancer (11,348 cases, 15,861 controls from the International Lung Cancer Consortium), and ovarian cancer (25,509 cases, 40,941 controls from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium). We used inverse variance weighting for the main analysis and the weighted median, MR-Egger and Mendelian Randomization Pleiotropy Residual Sum and Outlier as sensitivity analyses. Genetic proxies for CCBs were not associated with any cancer after Bonferroni-correction (at the threshold of p < 0.003). Associations were robust to different MR methods. In conclusion, our study suggests no association of genetic proxies for CCBs with 17 different cancers. While the findings add some support to the safety profile of CCBs in long-term use, future replication is necessary to provide definitive evidence.