JLJia Li
Papers(2)
Clinicopathologic cha…Insights into the Rol…
Collaborators(7)
Liang-Zhen XieYang FuYing GuoYing ShenDan-Ni DingFang-Yuan LiuFengjuan Han
Institutions(3)
Air Force Medical Uni…Heilongjiang Universi…First Affiliated Hosp…

Papers

Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors of patients with surgically treated high‐grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: A multicenter retrospective study

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate the prognostic factors and survival outcomes of patients with surgically treated high‐grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (NECC).MethodsThis multicenter, retrospective study involved 98 cervical cancer patients with stage IA2–IIA2 and IIIC1/2p high‐grade NECC. We divided the patients into two groups based on histology: the pure and mixed groups. All clinicopathologic variables were retrospectively evaluated. Cox regression and Kaplan–Meier methods were used for analysis.ResultsIn our study, 60 patients were in the pure group and 38 patients were in the mixed group. Cox multivariate analysis showed that mixed histology was a protective factor impacting overall survival (OS) (P = 0.026) and progression free survival (PFS) (P = 0.018) in surgically treated high‐grade NECC. Conversely, survival outcomes were negatively impacted by ovarian preservation (OS: HR, 20.84; 95% CI: 5.02–86.57, P < 0.001), age >45 years (OS: HR, 4.50; 95% CI: 1.0–18.83, P = 0.039), tumor size >4 cm (OS: HR, 6.23; 95% CI: 2.34–16.61, P < 0.001), parity >3 (OS: HR, 4.50; 95% CI: 1.02–19.91, P = 0.048), and perineural invasion (OS: HR, 5.21; 95% CI: 1.20–22.53, P = 0.027). Kaplan–Meier survival curves revealed notable differences in histologic type (OS: P = 0.045; PFS: P = 0.024), chemotherapy (OS: P = 0.0056; PFS: P = 0.0041), ovarian preservation (OS: P = 0.00031; PFS: P = 0.0023), uterine invasion (OS: P < 0.0001; PFS: P < 0.0001), and depth of stromal invasion (OS: P = 0.043; PFS: P = 0.022).ConclusionPatients with mixed histologic types who undergo surgery for high‐grade NECC have a better prognosis. Meanwhile, ovarian preservation, tumor size >4 cm, parity >3, age >45 years and perineural invasion were poor prognostic predictors. Therefore, patients with high‐risk factors should be considered in clinical practice.

2Papers
7Collaborators