Investigator

Jennifer Pors

Brazosport College

JPJennifer Pors
Papers(4)
Papillary and ductal …The Evolving Spectrum…The spectrum of oestr…Molecular characteriz…
Collaborators(10)
Lynn HoangNaveena SinghC Blake GilksStefan KommossAline TalhoukAmy JamiesonAmy LumArdalan AkbariBasile Tessier‐Clouti…Brooke E. Howitt
Institutions(5)
Brazosport CollegeUniversity Of British…Vancouver General Hos…University Of TbingenWashington University…

Papers

Papillary and ductal patterns of mesonephric‐like adenocarcinomas are often overlooked: a retrospective revaluation of over 1000 endometrial carcinomas

AimsMesonephric‐like adenocarcinoma (MLA) of the endometrium is often a diagnostic challenge, due to its morphological resemblance to other more common Müllerian neoplasms. This study aimed to retrospectively identify overlooked MLA in a large endometrial carcinoma cohort, using a combination of immunohistochemistry (IHC), morphology and KRAS sequencing.Methods and resultsIHC was conducted on 1094 endometrial carcinomas, identifying 16 potential MLA cases based on GATA3+ and/or TTF1+ and ER− staining patterns, which subsequently underwent detailed histological review, KRAS sequencing and ProMisE molecular classification. Of the IHC screen‐positive cases, one was positive for both GATA3 and TTF1, nine were positive for GATA3 only and six were positive for TTF1 only. All IHC screen‐positive cases were POLE wild‐type. All five tumours in the NSMP category showed morphological features of MLA, while the three MMRd and eight p53abn tumours did not show MLA morphology. The five cases diagnosed as MLA on review were all originally diagnosed as low‐grade endometrioid adenocarcinoma probably because of rare morphological patterns, being predominantly papillary or ductal. Four of the five cases harboured a KRAS mutation.ConclusionThis study highlights the importance of a comprehensive diagnostic approach for accurately identifying endometrial MLA and for pathologists to be aware of papillary and ductal patterns in endometrial carcinoma assessment. Further exploration into the molecular landscape of MLA is essential for refining diagnostic criteria and developing targeted therapies.

The Evolving Spectrum of Endometrial Glandular Proliferations With Corded and Hyalinized Features

We present the clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical features of 14 endometrial glandular proliferations with conspicuous corded and hyalinized (CH) features comprised entirely or predominantly of endometrial hyperplasia. Endometrial glandular lesions ranged in severity from endometrial hyperplasia with and without cytologic atypia (5/14 [36%]) to hyperplasia with architectural complexity bordering on well-differentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma (3/14 [21%]) to frank corded and hyalinized endometrial carcinoma (“CHEC”) (6/14 [43%]). In addition to sex cord–like growth and hyalinized stroma, other common histologic features included prominent spindle cells (11/14 [79%]), keratinizing and/or morular squamous differentiation (10/14 [71%]), and osseous metaplasia (6/14 [43%]). Immunohistochemical characterization revealed aberrant nuclear beta-catenin in all cases (14/14 [100%]); additionally, all cases demonstrated positive estrogen receptors, intact PTEN, PMS2 and MSH6, and wild-type p53 expression. Patients ranged in age from 24 to 58 (mean 38) years. Of 5 patients with hyperplasia with CH features, 2 experienced complete resolution after progestin therapy and none progressed to adenocarcinoma (mean follow-up 15.6 mo, range 2 to 64). By contrast, of 2 patients with hyperplasia bordering on CHEC and with available follow-up, both subsequently developed adenocarcinoma, suggesting that even focal increased architectural complexity may predict an elevated risk of malignancy. We conclude that CH morphology is not limited to endometrioid carcinoma and may occur across a spectrum of neoplastic proliferations, including those without sufficient architectural complexity or cytologic atypia to warrant classification as adenocarcinoma. We propose the term “corded and hyalinized endometrial hyperplasia” to describe this precursor lesion and report favorable outcomes with conservative treatment.

The spectrum of oestrogen receptor expression in endometrial carcinomas of no specific molecular profile

AimsDecreased oestrogen receptor (ER) expression is a marker of poor prognosis in endometrial carcinomas (EC) of no specific molecular profile (NSMP), but the optimal cut‐off to separate high‐risk ‘low ER’ versus low‐risk ‘high ER’ expression has not been defined. Here we characterised the distribution of ER staining in a cohort of ECs.Methods and resultsBiopsy specimens from 120 cases of NSMP EC were stained for ER and assigned an Allred score. In 66 additional cases ER staining of matched biopsy and hysterectomy were compared. Twelve of 120 tumours had an Allred score of 0–3, including three endometrioid carcinomas (EEA) (one G1, two G3), four clear cell carcinomas (CCC), two mesonephric‐like adenocarcinoma (MLA) and one each of: gastric‐type adenocarcinoma, carcinosarcoma and endometrial carcinoma NOS. Three had Allred scores of 4–5: two MLA and one high‐grade carcinoma with yolk sac differentiation. Five had Allred scores of 6: four EEA (one G1, one G2, two G3) and one mixed clear cell and endometrioid carcinoma. The remaining 100 tumours with Allred scores ≥ 7 were all EEA (66 G1, 28 G2, five G3 and one grade unknown). Comparing the biopsy versus hysterectomy ER staining (n = 66), the results were within a single Allred score point, except two cases with strong diffuse expression in the biopsy (Allred 8) and moderate expression in the hysterectomy (Allred 5).ConclusionsMost NSMP ECs (> 80%) show high ER expression (Allred score ≥ 7). All non‐endometrioid carcinomas and a few endometrioid carcinomas had lower ER expression (Allred score ≤ 6) or were completely negative.

Molecular characterization of invasive and in situ squamous neoplasia of the vulva and implications for morphologic diagnosis and outcome

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-independent vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) is an aggressive clinical entity. Current diagnostic guidelines for premalignant lesions are ambiguous, and their molecular profile and progression events are still unclear. We selected 75 samples, from 40 patients, including 33 VSCC, 8 verrucous carcinomas (VC), 13 differentiated-type vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN), 11 suspicious for dVIN (?dVIN), 6 differentiated exophytic vulvar intraepithelial lesions (DE-VIL), 2 vulvar acanthosis with altered differentiation (VAAD), and 2 usual-type vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (uVIN/HSIL). Invasive and precursor lesions were matched in 29 cases. Clinical information, p16 immunohistochemistry, and mutation analysis were performed on all lesions. All dVIN, ?dVIN, DE-VIL, and VAAD were p16 negative, all uVIN/HSIL were p16 positive. In the HPV-independent group, mutations were identified in 6 genes: TP53 (n = 40), PIK3CA (n = 20), HRAS (n = 12), MET (n = 5), PTEN (n = 4), and BRAF (n = 1). TP53 mutations occurred in 73% (22/30) VSCC, 85% (11/13) dVIN, 70% (7/10) ?dVIN and no VC (0/8), DE-VIL (0/6) nor VAAD (0/2). Basal atypia was the only reliable feature of TP53 mutations. ?dVIN lesions that were non-acanthotic and atypical but obscured by inflammation, all harbored TP53 mutations. In lesions without TP53 mutations, PIK3CA (50% VC, 33% DE-VIL, 100% VAAD, 40% VSCC) and HRAS (63% VC, 33% DE-VIL, 0% VAAD, 20% VSCC) mutations were found. Mutational progression from in situ to invasive was seen (7/26, 27%) and usually involved TP53 (4/26, 15%). Cases with TP53 and PIK3CA co-mutations had the worse clinical outcomes (p < 0.001). We recommend testing for p53 in all HPV-independent lesions suspicious for dVIN, even in the presence of marked inflammation or non-acanthotic skin, particularly when close to a margin. VC, VAAD, and DE-VIL, were almost never mutated for TP53, but instead often harbored PIK3CA and HRAS mutations. In VSCC, combined TP53 and PIK3CA mutations may inform prognosis.

17Works
4Papers
16Collaborators
Endometrial NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorAdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, EndometrioidCarcinoma in SituCarcinoma, Squamous CellPapillomavirus InfectionsTumor Suppressor Protein p53