Jeeyeon Kim

A predictive model for lymph node metastasis using tumor location in presumed early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer patients

The aim of this study was to identify high- and low-risk subgroups of patients with lymph node (LN) metastasis in presumed early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC) patients. Clinicopathologic data of presumed early-stage endometrioid EC patients (n=361) treated with lymphadenectomy between March 2000 and July 2022 were analyzed. None of the patient had definite evidence of LN metastasis in a preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A received operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to define the sensitivity and specificity for the combined preoperative risk factors for LN metastasis, which was determined by multivariate analysis. Nineteen patients (5.3%) had LN metastasis. Multivariate analysis identified cervical stromal invasion on MRI (odds ratio [OR]=4.386; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.020-18.852; p=0.047), cornual location of tumor on MRI (OR=36.208; 95% CI=7.902-165.913; p<0.001), and lower uterine segment/isthmic location of tumor on MRI (OR=8.454; 95% CI=1.567-45.610; p=0.013) as independent prognostic factors associated with LN metastasis. Patients were categorized into low- and high-risk groups according to risk criteria. Significant differences in the rates of LN metastasis were observed between the two groups (0.4% vs. 22.2%, p<0.001). Approximately 95% of presumed early-stage endometrioid EC patients did not have LN metastasis. A model using tumor location was significantly correlated with the risk of LN metastasis. Even in presumed early-stage endometrioid EC patients, therefore, tumor location should be investigated to determine whether to perform LN assessment.

Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery in advanced stage endometrial cancer

AbstractAimStaging surgery in early stage endometrial cancer has been shown to be feasible and safe with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in many previous studies. However, there is limited literature on MIS's safety in advanced stages. This study aims to identify factors associated with survival in stage III endometrial cancer and investigate survival differences based on surgical approach.MethodsPatients with stage III endometrial cancer who underwent staging surgery from March 2002 to March 2023 were included in this study. Various clinicopathological features, disease‐free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.ResultsAmong the 79 patients included in this study, 20 patients underwent MIS (25.3%) and 59 patients underwent open surgery (74.7%). The open surgery group had a higher prevalence of aggressive histology, a higher median pretreatment CA‐125 level, and a greater number of harvested lymph nodes compared to the MIS group. Five‐year OS and DFS was higher in the open surgery group than in the MIS group (DFS: 67.9% vs. 59.9%, p = 0.046; OS: 74.3 vs. 50.6%, p = 0.008). In multivariate analysis, younger than 55 years old (OR, 2.778; 95% CI, 1.078–7.156; p = 0.034), and open surgery (OR, 3.671; 95% CI, 1.581–8.522; p = 0.002) was related to improved OS.ConclusionsOpen staging surgery showed better survival outcomes when compared to MIS in stage III endometrial cancer patients in our study. For patients who are older than 55 years old and have aggressive histology in endometrial biopsy, considering open surgery may help improve their prognosis, even if preoperative MRI suggests early‐stage endometrial cancer.