Jacobus van der Velden

Letter to the editor on 'Prognostic factors in patients with vulvar cancer: the VULCAN study'

Treatment of bulky lymph nodes in locally advanced cervical cancer: boosting versus debulking

Treatment strategies for bulky lymph nodes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer scheduled for definitive chemoradiation include nodal boosting with radiotherapy, surgical debulking, or both. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to compare survival and toxicity in patients receiving these treatments and to compare them with a group that received neither form of treatment. Women diagnosed between January 2009 and January 2017 with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage IB2, IIA2-IVA cervical cancer with lymph nodes ≥1.5 cm without upper limit on pretreatment imaging and treated with definitive chemoradiation were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients were categorized by intention-to-treat strategy: boosting, debulking, or neither treatment, with subgroup analysis for patients receiving both treatments, that is, debulking with boosting. Overall and relapse-free survival outcomes were compared by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses and toxicity by logistic regression analysis. Of 190 patients, 101 (53%) received only nodal boosting, 31 (16%) debulking alone, 29 (15%) debulking combined with boosting, and 29 (15%) received neither treatment. The 5 year overall and relapse-free survival for the treatment groups were 58%, 45% and 45% (p=0.19), and 47%, 44% and 46% (p=0.87), respectively. Multivariable Cox regression analyses demonstrated no differences in overall and relapse-free survival. Combination of debulking with boosting was associated with decreased overall and relapse-free survival compared with debulking alone (HR 2.47, 95% CI 1.22 to 5.00; and HR 2.37, 95% CI 1.14 to 4.93). Nodal boosting was independently associated with a decreased toxicity risk compared with debulking strategy (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.83). This study showed no survival benefit from either nodal boosting or debulking strategy in patients with suspicious bulky nodes. Nodal boosting might, however, be associated with less toxicity. Dual treatment with debulking and boosting showed a worse survival outcome because this group probably represents patients with poor prognostic factors.

Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery Versus Chemoradiation in Stage IB2-IIB Cervical Cancer: EORTC-55994

The EORTC-55994 trial compared neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by radical surgery with concomitant chemoradiation (CCRT) in patients with Stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer. This trial took almost 12 years to recruit 626 patients with a median follow-up of 8.7 years.

The risk of lymph node metastasis in the new FIGO 2018 stage IA cervical cancer with >7 mm diameter

In the 2018 FIGO staging system, cervical cancers with ≤5 mm depth of invasion (DOI) and a diameter of >7 mm, first classified as stage IB, are classified as stage IA. In this group, it is unclear what the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) is. This retrospective cohort study aims to determine the incidence of LNM and to study the association between disease-related characteristics and LNM. Women diagnosed with FIGO 2009 IB cervical cancer, with ≤5 mm DOI and a diameter >7 mm, treated with a radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy between 1985 and 2020 were selected from the databases of the Amsterdam University Medical Center and the University Medical Center Groningen. The specimens of patients with LNM were revised by expert pathologists. The incidence of LNM was calculated. The associations between LNM and DOI, diameter, histological type, clinical visibility and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) were evaluated by calculating odds ratios using logistic regression. Of the 389 patients included, 10 had pathologically confirmed LNM (2.6%, 95% confidence interval=1.3%-4.5%). In case of LVSI, univariate analysis showed an increased risk of LNM (p=0.003 and p=0.012, respectively). No difference in LNM was found between lesions diagnosed by microscopy and clinically visible lesions. No LNM were found in patients without LVSI and a DOI of ≤3 mm. For patients with stage IA cervical cancer with a diameter >7 mm, we recommend considering a pelvic lymph node assessment in case of DOI >3 mm and/or presence of LVSI.

Radical hysterectomy or chemoradiotherapy for clinically early-stage cervical cancer with suspicious lymph nodes on imaging: a retrospective cohort study

The optimal treatment of clinically early-stage cervical cancer with suspicious lymph nodes on pretreatment imaging is unclear. Therefore, we aimed to compare surgery (i.e., radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy±adjuvant therapy) with primary chemoradiotherapy as treatment strategies in this patient group regarding recurrence-free, overall survival and toxicity. Women diagnosed between 2009-2017 with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2009) stage IA-IIA and suspicious nodes based on radiologic assessment of pretreatment imaging were retrospectively selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Cox proportional hazard was used to estimate survival and logistic regression for toxicity. Inverse probability weighting was used to correct for confounding. Grade ≥2 surgery-related (≤30 days) and grade ≥3 chemotherapy or radiotherapy-related (≤6 months) toxicity were collected. Missing data were imputed. Of 330 patients included, 131 (40%) received surgery (followed by adjuvant therapy in 54%) and 199 (60%) chemoradiotherapy. Pathological nodal status was known in 100% of the surgery group and 32% (n=63) of the chemoradiotherapy group, of whom 43% (56/131) and 89% (56/63), respectively, had metastases. After adjustment for confounders, the recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]=0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.34-1.31) and overall survival (HR=0.75; 95% CI=0.38-1.47) were not significantly different between both groups, while surgery was associated with more toxicity (odds ratio=2.82; 95% CI=1.42-5.60), mainly surgery-related. In patients with clinically early-stage cervical cancer and suspicious nodes on imaging, surgery and primary chemoradiotherapy yielded comparable results in terms of survival, whereas surgery might be associated with more (surgery-related) short-term toxicity.