Jaclyn C Watkins

Sclerosing stromal tumour: a clinicopathological study of 100 cases of a distinctive benign ovarian stromal tumour typically occurring in the young

AimsSince the sclerosing stromal tumour (SST) of the ovary was first described in 1973, few studies have expanded upon its histological features or overlap with other tumours. We thus investigate these aspects based on our experience with 100 cases.Methods and resultsThe patients, 14 of whom were pregnant, ranged from 12 to 63 years (median = 26 years). Ten patients had hormonal manifestations (seven oestrogenic, three androgenic). Bilateral ovarian involvement was present in two cases. Size ranged from 1 to 23 cm (mean = 8.4 cm). Most tumours were solid and white with focal yellow areas; oedema with cystic degeneration (seen in 25 cases) resulted in eight being predominantly cystic. On microscopic examination, alternating cellular and paucicellular areas (pseudolobulation) were prominent in 94 cases but seen to a limited degree in the remaining neoplasms. Admixed spindled and luteinised cells were present in all tumours, but 13 demonstrated mainly spindled cells and 19 demonstrated mainly lutein cells; 14 of the latter were from pregnant patients. The stroma was typically oedematous or collagenous, but in 14 cases was prominently hyalinised and, in four, myxoid. Prominent vascularity was present in most cases. The mitotic rate ranged from 0 to 8/10 high‐power fields (HPF), but most demonstrated <1/10 HPF.ConclusionsThe differential diagnosis of SST is broad, including fibromas, thecomas, solitary fibrous tumours, pregnancy luteomas, myxomas, other ovarian sex cord‐stromal tumours with sclerosis and, rarely, Krukenberg tumours. Strict adherence to the requirement of pseudolobulation, prominent (usually ectatic) vessels, and lutein cells and fibroblasts admixed in a jumbled manner, will distinguish the neoplasm from others in the differential.

HPV-independent, p53-wild-type vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: a review of nomenclature and the journey to characterize verruciform and acanthotic precursor lesions of the vulva

Vulvar squamous cell carcinomas and their precursors are currently classified by the World Health Organization based on their association with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV). HPV independent lesions often harbor driver alterations in TP53, usually seen in the setting of chronic vulvar inflammation. However, a group of pre-invasive vulvar squamous lesions is independent from both HPV and mutant TP53. The lesions described within this category feature marked acanthosis, verruciform growth and altered squamous maturation, and over the last two decades several studies have added to their characterization. They have a documented association with verrucous carcinoma and conventional squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva, suggesting a precursor role. They also harbor recurrent genomic alterations in several oncogenes, mainly PIK3CA and HRAS, indicating a neoplastic nature. In this review, we provide a historical perspective and a comprehensive description of these lesions. We also offer an appraisal of the terminology used over the years, going from Vulvar Acanthosis with Altered Differentiation and Verruciform Lichen Simplex Chronicus to Differentiated Exophytic Vulvar Intraepithelial Lesion and Vulvar Aberrant Maturation, the latter term having been recently proposed by the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Diseases. In line with the recognition of these lesions by the 2020 World Health Organization Classification of Tumours as a neoplastic precursor, we herein propose the term HPV-independent, p53-wild-type verruciform acanthotic Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia (HPVi(p53wt) vaVIN), which better conveys not only the pathology but also the neoplastic nature and the biologic risk inherent to these uncommon and challenging lesions. We outline strict morphologic and immunohistochemical criteria for its diagnosis and distinction from mimickers. Immunohistochemistry for p16 and p53 should be performed routinely in the diagnostic work-up of these lesions, and the morphologic alternative term vaVIN should be reserved for instances in which p16/HPV/p53 status is unknown. We also discuss management considerations and the need to further explore precursors within and beyond the spectrum of verruciform acanthotic vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia.