Investigator

Irene Kraus Christiansen

Project Manager and Director of the National HPV Reference Laboratory · Akershus Universitetssykehus HF, Department of Microbiology and Infection Control

IKCIrene Kraus Chris…
Papers(2)
Evaluation of Harmoni…Randomized Implementa…
Collaborators(9)
Jannicke Mohr BerlandMaj Liv EideMari NygårdOlav Karsten VintermyrOle Erik IversenPhilip E CastleAmeli TropéBirgit EngesæterChristine Monceyron J…
Institutions(8)
Akershus University H…Stavanger University …University Hospital O…Institute of populati…Haukeland University …University Of BergenDepartment Of Health …Stfold Hospital Trust

Papers

Evaluation of HarmoniaHPV test for detection of clinically significant Human Papillomavirus infection using the VALGENT framework

The VALidation of HPV GENotyping Tests (VALGENT) is a framework for comparison and validation of HPV tests with genotyping capabilities. In this study, the clinical performance of a single tube HPV test -HarmoniaHPV- was assessed in SurePath™ samples and compared to a clinically validated reference test, the GP5+/6+ Enzyme ImmunoAssay (GP5+/6 + EIA). HarmoniaHPV test is a real-time, PCR based, limited genotyping HPV test which detects 14 high-risk HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66 and 68 with HPV16, and HPV 18 reported individually. Clinical performance was assessed using 998 unselected, cervical screening samples enriched with 297 cytologically abnormal specimens (100 atypical squamous cells of unspecified significance, 100 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, 97 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions). Cases were defined as women diagnosed with histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or more (≥CIN2, N = 122). Using the manufacturer recommended (un-adjusted) cut-offs, HarmoniaHPV had non-inferior sensitivity for detection of ≥ CIN2 but showed inferior specificity. A cut-off optimisation exercise was therefore carried out and optimised cut-offs for each individual channel rendered a sensitivity and specificity of HarmoniaHPV that was non-inferior to GP5+/6 + EIA. Analytically, the test showed excellent intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility, which improved further with the use of the optimised cut-offs. HarmoniaHPV when operated with optimised cut-offs fulfils the international clinical criteria for use in cervical cancer screening on SurePath samples. The optimised cut-offs warrant additional testing and independent validation.

Randomized Implementation of a Primary Human Papillomavirus Testing–based Cervical Cancer Screening Protocol for Women 34 to 69 Years in Norway

Abstract Background: Cervical cancer screening programs are facing a programmatic shift where screening protocol based on human papillomavirus testing (HPV-Screening protocol) is replacing the liquid-based cytology (LBC-Screening protocol). For safe technology transfer within the nationwide screening programme in Norway, HPV-Screening protocol was implemented randomized to compare the real-world effectiveness of HPV-Screening protocol and LBC-Screening protocol at the first screening round. Methods: Among 302,295 women ages 34 to 69 years scheduled to attend screening from February 2015 to June 2017, 157,447 attended. A total of 77,207 were randomly allocated to the HPV-Screening protocol and 80,240 were allocated to the LBC-Screening protocol. All women were followed up for 18 months. Results: The HPV-Screening protocol resulted in a relative increase of 60% in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or worse [risk ratio (RR) = 1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.5–1.7], 40% in CIN grade 3 or worse (RR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.3–1.6), 40% in cancer (RR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.0–2.1), and 60% in colposcopy referrals (RR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.5–1.6) compared with LBC-Screening. The performance of both protocols was age dependent, being more effective in women ages under 50 years. Conclusions: The HPV-Screening protocol was well accepted by women in Norway and detected more CIN2, CIN3, and cancers compared with the LBC-Screening protocol. Impact: A randomized implementation of the HPV-Screening protocol with real-world assessment enabled a gradual, quality assured, and safe technology transition. HPV-based screening protocol may further be improved by using HPV genotyping and age-specific referral algorithms.

35Works
2Papers
9Collaborators
Early Detection of CancerPapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Positions

2013–

Project Manager and Director of the National HPV Reference Laboratory

Akershus Universitetssykehus HF · Department of Microbiology and Infection Control

2012–

Researcher

Oslo universitetssykehus Ullevål · Department of Medical Genetics

2007–

Senior Scientist

NorChip AS · Research and Development

2000–

Research Fellow

NorChip AS · Research and Development

2003–

Research Fellow

Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena · Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe

Education

2008

PhD - dr.philos

Universitetet i Oslo · Institutt for klinisk medisin, Fakultetsdivisjon Rikshospitalet

2000

Candidata scientiarum

Universitetet i Oslo Biologisk institutt · The Biotechnology Centre of Oslo

1998

Candidata magisterii

Universitetet i Oslo Biologisk institutt