Investigator

Ibrahim Halil Sahin

University of Michigan

IHSIbrahim Halil Sah…
Papers(1)
Differential Response…
Collaborators(10)
Jim AbrahamJoanne XiuJohn MarshallMatthew A. PowellMichael J. HallMichael ToboniMohamed E. SalemMoh’d M. KhushmanPhilip A. PhilipPriya Jayachandran
Institutions(10)
Upmc Hillman Cancer C…Caris Life SciencesGeorgetown Lombardi C…Washington University…Fox Chase Cancer Cent…University Of Alabama…Unknown InstitutionWashington University…The Barbara Ann Karma…USC Norris Comprehens…

Papers

Differential Responses to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors are Governed by Diverse Mismatch Repair Gene Alterations

Abstract Purpose: The response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer is variable. Here, we explored the differential response to ICIs according to different mismatch repair alterations Experimental Design: Colorectal cancer (N = 13,701) and endometrial cancer (N = 3,315) specimens were tested at Caris Life Sciences. Median overall survival (mOS) was estimated using Kaplan–Meier. The prediction of high-, intermediate-, and low-affinity epitopes by tumor mutation burden (TMB) values was conducted using R-squared (R2). Results: Compared with mutL (MLH1 and PMS2) co-loss, the mOS was longer in mutS (MSH2 and MSH6) co-loss in all colorectal cancer (54.6 vs. 36 months; P = 0.0.025) and endometrial cancer (81.5 vs. 48.2 months; P < 0.001) patients. In ICI-treated patients, the mOS was longer in mutS co-loss in colorectal cancer [not reached (NR) vs. 36 months; P = 0.011). In endometrial cancer, the mOS was NR vs. 42.2 months; P = 0.711]. The neoantigen load (NAL) in mutS co-loss compared with mutL co-loss was higher in colorectal cancer (high-affinity epitopes: 25.5 vs. 19; q = 0.017, intermediate: 39 vs. 32; q = 0.004, low: 87.5 vs. 73; q < 0.001) and endometrial cancer (high-affinity epitopes: 15 vs. 11; q = 0.002, intermediate: 27.5 vs. 19; q < 0.001, low: 59 vs. 41; q < 0.001), respectively. R2 ranged from 0.25 in mutS co-loss colorectal cancer to 0.95 in mutL co-loss endometrial cancer. Conclusions: Patients with mutS co-loss experienced longer mOS in colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer and better response to ICIs in colorectal cancer. Among all explored biomarkers, NAL was higher in mutS co-loss and may be a potential driving factor for the observed better outcomes. TMB did not reliably predict NAL.

44Works
1Papers
17Collaborators

Positions

Researcher

University of Michigan

2025–

Researcher

University of Michigan

2022–

Researcher

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine

2020–

Assistant Professor of Medicine

Moffitt Cancer Center · Gastrointestinal Oncology

Researcher

Emory University Winship Cancer Institute

Education

2009

MD

Hacettepe Üniversitesi