Investigator

Hsiu-Jung Tung

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

HTHsiu-Jung Tung
Papers(3)
Rare Subtype of Endom…Human papillomavirus …Role of human papillo…
Collaborators(6)
Chyong-Huey LaiRen-Chin WuChiao-Yun LinLan-Yan YangTing-Chang ChangAngel Chao
Institutions(2)
Chang Gung Memorial H…Chang Gung University…

Papers

Human papillomavirus prevalence, genotype distribution, and prognostic factors of vaginal cancer

AbstractWe aimed to investigate human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence and genotype distribution and prognostic factors in vaginal cancer (VC). VC patients who received treatment between 1989 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. L1 general polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by HPV Blot (King Car, I‐Lan, Taiwan) and E6 type‐specific‐PCR were performed for genotyping firstly. P16 and p53 immunohistochemistry staining was performed. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified predictors of clinical outcomes.79 VC patients were eligible for analysis. 73 patients (92.4%) were squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and 6 (7.6%) as non‐SCC. The median follow‐up time was 134.3 months (range 0.9–273.4). Among nine initially HPV‐negative cases, seven were identified as being positive through HPV16/18/45/52/58 whole‐genome amplification followed by Sanger sequencing (WGASS). HPV DNA sequences were detected in 98.6% of SCC and 83.3% of non‐SCC, respectively, with HPV16 (49.4%), HPV52 (15.2%) and HPV58 (8.9%) being predominant. Patients with paraaortic lymph node (LN) metastasis had a 5‐year cancer‐specific survival (CSS) rate of 0%. Multivariate analysis revealed that only p16 and stage were significantly correlated with prognosis. Variables with strong correlations (p16‐ and HPV‐positivity, LN metastasis and stage), were included in models 2–5 alternatively. Stage III/IV (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.64–4.56) and LN metastasis (HR = 2.81–3.44) were significant negative predictors of CSS, whereas p16‐positivity (HR = 0.29–0.32) and HPV‐positivity (HR = 0.14) were related to better prognosis. In conclusion, 97.5% of VCs were HPV‐positive with WGASS. Stage III/IV and LN metastasis were significant negative predictors, whereas p16‐ and HPV‐positivity were significantly associated with better prognosis.

Role of human papillomavirus status after conization for high‐grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

AbstractHuman papillomavirus (HPV) is the well‐established etiologic factor for cervical neoplasia. Cervical conization constitutes an effective treatment for high‐grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (HG‐CIN). We conducted an observational study for long‐term outcomes and HPV genotype changes after conization for HG‐CIN. Between 2008 and 2014, patients with newly diagnosed HG‐CIN before conization (surveillance new [SN] group) and those who had undergone conization without hysterectomy (surveillance previous [SP] group) were enrolled. HPV testing and Pap smear were performed periodically for the SN and SP (collectively S) groups. All other patients receiving conization for HG‐CIN during the study period were identified from our hospital database. Those eligible but not enrolled into our study were assigned to the non‐surveillance (non‐S) group. For the S group (n = 493), the median follow‐up period was 74.3 months. Eighty‐four cases had recurrent CIN Grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) (5‐year cumulative rate: 14.8%), of which six had invasive cancer. Among the 84 patients, 65 (77.4%) exhibited type‐specific persistence in the paired HPV results, whereas only 7 (8.3%) harbored new HPV types that belonged to the 9‐valent vaccine types. Among the 7397 non‐S patients, 789 demonstrated recurrent CIN2+, of which 57 had invasive cancer. The stages distribution of those progressed to invasive cancer in the non‐S group were more advanced than the S group (P = .033). Active surveillance might reduce the severity of those progressed to cancer. Because a majority of the patients with recurrent CIN2+ had persistent type‐specific HPV infections, effective therapeutic vaccines are an unmet medical need.

5Works
3Papers
6Collaborators