Hong Zhu

Mirvetuximab soravtansine in platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer with high folate receptor-alpha expression: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV), a new antibody-drug conjugate, versus the investigator's choice of chemotherapy (IC) was the first treatment to demonstrate benefits for progression-free and overall survival in platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (PROC) with high folate receptor-alpha (high-FRα) expression. Efficacy, safety, and economic effectiveness make MIRV the new standard of care for these patients. Based on patients and clinical parameters from MIRASOL (GOG 3045/ENGOT-ov55) phase III randomized controlled trials, the Markov model with a 20-year time horizon was established to evaluate the cost and efficacy of MIRV and IC for PROC with high-FRα expression, considering the bevacizumab-pretreated situation from the American healthcare system. Total cost, life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and incremental net health benefits were the main outcome indicators and compared with willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted. Compared with the IC, MIRV was associated with incremental costs of $538,251, $575,674, and $188,248 with the corresponding QALYs (LYs) increased by 0.90 (1.55), 1.09 (1.88), and 0.53 (0.79), leading to ICERs of $596,189/QALY ($347,995/LY), $530,061/QALY ($306,894/LY), and $1,011,310/QALY ($680,025/LY) in the overall, bevacizumab-naïve, and bevacizumab-pretreated patients, respectively. When MIRV is reduced by more than 75%, it may be a cost-effective treatment. At the current price, MIRV for PROC with high-FRα expression is not the cost-effective strategy in the US. However, its treatment has higher health benefits in bevacizumab-naïve patients, which is likely to be an alternative.

Immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced endometrial cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Pembrolizumab and dostarlimab are immune checkpoint inhibitors that target programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1). Combination anti-PD-1 regimens have been shown to exhibit favorable survival benefits when treating advanced endometrial cancer (EC). Which treatment was preferable will need to be confirmed by a cost-effectiveness comparison between them. Based on patient and clinical parameters from RUBY and NRG-GY018 phase III randomized controlled trials, the Markov model with a 20-year time horizon was established to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of dostarlimab plus chemotherapy (DC), pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (PC), and chemotherapy alone (C) treatment for patients with mismatch repair-proficient microsatellite-stable (pMMR-MSS) and mismatch repair-deficient microsatellite instability-high (dMMR-MSI-H) advanced EC from the American payers' perspective. The main results include total cost, life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) at a $150,000/QALY of willingness-to-pay. In the pMMR-MSS population, DC, PC, and C produced costs (QALYs) of $99,205 (3.02), $322,530 (3.25), and $421,923 (4.40), resulting in corresponding ICERs of $974,177/QALY (PC vs. C), $234,527/QALY (DC vs. C), $86,671/QALY (DC vs. PC), respectively; In the dMMR-MSI-H population, DC, PC, and C obtained costs (QALYs) of $120,177 (5.73), $691,399 (8.43), and $708,787 (11.26), yielding ICERs of $266,423/QALY (PC vs. C), $135,165/QALY (DC vs. C), $7,866/QALY (DC vs. PC), respectively. In the US, DC was a more cost-effective treatment than PC for patients with advanced EC irrespective of MMR status. However, compared to C, DC was associated with more cost-effectiveness in the dMMR-MSI-H population.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations for patients with advanced endometrial cancer: a network meta-analysis and cost-utility analysis

Immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations show significant survival advantages compared with chemotherapy for patients with advanced endometrial cancer. To compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of different immunotherapy combinations for clinician and patient decision-making. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science Databases were reviewed from January 1, 2010 to October 30, 2023, for phase III randomized controlled trials of first-line immunotherapy combinations in patients with advanced endometrial cancer. Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to obtain hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival and progression-free survival, relative risks (RRs) of adverse events, and corresponding p value. The lifetime Markov model of cost-effectiveness analysis was developed to summarize the cost, life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios at the US$150 000/QALY of willingness-to-pay of six first-line treatment strategies. Four trials were identified, involving 2577 patients. Dostarlimab plus chemotherapy or durvalumab plus chemotherapy with olaparib was associated with more survival benefits than other immunotherapy regimens and chemotherapy in the mismatch repair-deficient microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) and mismatch repair-proficient microsatellite-stable (pMMR/MSS) population, respectively. Further, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy increased efficacy (cost) by 3.76 QALYs and US$540 817, which yielded incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of US$143 894/QALY in the dMMR/MSI-H population. First-line durvalumab plus chemotherapy with olaparib, and dostarlimab plus chemotherapy, were more beneficial for survival in the pMMR/MSS and dMMR/MSI-H populations, respectively. Only pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy was cost-effective for patients with dMMR/MSI-H endometrial cancer in the USA.

International cost-effectiveness analysis of chemoradiotherapy plus pembrolizumab for locally advanced cervical cancer

Pembrolizumab administration can improve concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) efficacy in newly diagnosed, high-risk, locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Given the importance of balancing the costs of innovative therapeutics against their efficacy, this study was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness from the perspective of payers in Americas, Europe, and Asia. The main survival and other relevant parameters of 1,060 LACC patients from the KEYNOTE-A18 trial were collected to establish a lifetime 3-state Markov model to evaluate the cost and effectiveness of pembrolizumab-CCRT and placebo-CCRT. Primary outcome measures included total cost, life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), incremental net monetary benefit, and incremental net health benefits (INHBs) at countries' traditional willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds. Model stability was also examined through sensitivity analyses. The USA, Italy, and China are selected as representative countries for each of the 3 continents, assuming that their WTP thresholds were $150,000, $43,749, and $37,766 per QALY. The increased efficacy and costs of pembrolizumab-CCRT versus placebo-CCRT were 2.52 QALYs (3.11 LYs) and $346,479, 2.30 QALYs (2.81 LYs) and $236,776, 1.79 QALYs (2.12 LYs) and $29,027, calculating the ICER for the 3 countries as $137,500/QALY ($111,499/LY), $102,758/QALY ($84,192/LY), and $16,217/QALY ($13,726/LY), respectively. The respective INHBs were 0.21 QALY, -3.11 QALY, and 1.02 QALY, and pembrolizumab-CCRT was exhibited cost-effectiveness opportunities of 62.68%, 12.53%, and 75.23% at the selected WTP threshold, respectively. At current prices, pembrolizumab-CCRT represents a cost-effective alternative for patients with LACC in the USA and China, but not in Italy.

Camrelizumab Plus Famitinib versus Camrelizumab Alone and Investigator's Choice of Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer: A Randomized, Phase II Study

PURPOSE To compare camrelizumab (an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody) plus famitinib (a multitarget receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor) versus camrelizumab and chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (R/M CC). METHODS Patients with pretreated R/M CC were randomly assigned to receive camrelizumab (200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks) plus famitinib (20 mg orally once daily), camrelizumab, or investigator's choice of chemotherapy. The primary end point was comparison of objective response rate (ORR) per blinded independent central review (BICR) for camrelizumab-famitinib versus camrelizumab in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS Overall, 105, 54, and 35 patients received camrelizumab-famitinib, camrelizumab, and chemotherapy, respectively. As of April 21, 2023, ORR per BICR was significantly improved with camrelizumab-famitinib compared with camrelizumab (41.0% [95% CI, 31.5 to 51.0] v 24.1% [95% CI, 13.5 to 37.6]; difference, 16.9% [95% CI, 2.1 to 31.7]; one-sided P = .0181). Per investigator, ORR with camrelizumab-famitinib was 42.9% (95% CI, 33.2 to 52.9), notably higher than 22.2% (95% CI, 12.0 to 35.6) with camrelizumab and 14.3% (95% CI, 4.8 to 30.3) with chemotherapy. Median progression-free survival per investigator was prolonged with camrelizumab-famitinib than camrelizumab and chemotherapy (8.1 months [95% CI, 6.2 to 12.4] vs 4.1 months [95% CI, 2.1 to 5.1] and 2.9 months [95% CI, 2.0 to 6.2]). Median overall survival with camrelizumab-famitinib, camrelizumab, and chemotherapy, as of October 19, 2023, was 20.2 months (95% CI, 15.3 to not reached [NR]), 14.9 months (95% CI, 12.6 to NR), and 13.9 months (95% CI, 7.4 to 20.0), respectively. Eighty-nine (84.8%), eight (15.1%), and 18 (60.0%) patients who received camrelizumab-famitinib, camrelizumab, and chemotherapy, respectively, experienced grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSION Camrelizumab plus famitinib improved antitumor activity while exhibiting a manageable safety profile in patients with pretreated R/M CC, potentially offering a novel treatment option.

3D-printed individual template brachytherapy for the treatment of intractable central pelvic recurrent cervical cancer: A single institution experience

The prognosis of recurrent cervical cancer tends to be poor and there are limited effective treatments currently available for these patients. This study was developed to find a safe and effective treatment for patients with central pelvic recurrent cervical cancer. This retrospective study analyzed patients with central pelvic recurrent cervical cancer who received 3D-printed individual template (3D-PIT) brachytherapy between February 2019 and June 2023. Analyses of dosimetric parameters, toxicity-related complications, and survival were conducted based on the data of these patients. Twenty-one patients with central pelvic recurrent cervical cancer patients were enrolled. All of them received 3D-printed individual template (3D-PIT) brachytherapy. The mean respective adjusted cumulative HRCTV-D90 and HRCTV-D98 values for these patients were 86.9 Gy and 75.4 Gy. And the local control (LC) rate of these patients was 57.1%. In these 21 patients, only 2 (9.5%) of them experienced grade 3-4 rectal adverse reactions, while 7 (33.3%) patients experienced grade 3-4 bladder adverse reactions. 5(23.8%) patients had fistula, while 3 of these 5 patients had undergone prior anti-VEGF targeted drug treatment which is a risk factor of fistula. The respective 2-year rates of overall and progression-free survival (OS and PFS) for these patients were 72.9% and 57.4%, with a 26-month median PFS. These single-institution data highlight the potential viability of 3D-PIT brachytherapy as an approach to managing intractable central pelvic recurrent cervical cancer following first-line treatment.

Olaparib plus bevacizumab as a first-line maintenance treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer by molecular status: an updated PAOLA-1 based cost-effectiveness analysis

The PAOLA-1 trial (NCT02477644) reported final survival benefit associated with olaparib plus bevacizumab maintenance treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) based on molecular status. Our aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of olaparib plus bevacizumab for overall patients, patients with a breast cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA) mutation, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), or HRD without BRCA mutations AOC from the context of the American healthcare system. Analysis of health outcomes in life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in various molecular status-based AOC patient at a $150,000/QALY of willingness-to-pay was performed using a state-transitioned Markov model with a 20-year time horizon. Meanwhile, sensitivity analyses assessments were also used to gauge the model's stability. The ICERs of olaparib plus bevacizumab versus bevacizumab alone were $487,428 ($374,758), $249,579 ($191,649), $258,859 ($198,739), and $270,736 ($206,640) per QALY (LY) in the overall patients, patients with BRCA mutations, patients with HRD, and patients with HRD without BRCA mutations AOC, respectively, which indicated that The ICERs was higher than $150,000/QALY in the US. Progression-free survival (PFS) value and olaparib cost emerged as the primary influencing factors of these findings in the sensitivity analysis. At current cost levels, olaparib plus bevacizumab treatment is not a cost-effective treatment for patients with AOC regardless of their molecular status in the US. However, this maintenance treatment may be more favorable health advantages for patients with BRAC mutations AOC.

Effects of activating GABAB1 receptor on proliferation, migration, invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of ovarian cancer cells

AbstractObjectiveThis study aimed to explore the effects of activating GABAB1 receptor by baclofen on proliferation, migration, invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of ovarian cancer cells.ResultsOne hundred μmol/L, 200 μmol/L and 300 μmol/L were selected as low, medium and high baclofen concentrations respectively. Cells were divided into four groups: Control, 100 μmol/L, 200 μmol/L and 300 μmol/L. Compared with the control group, the viability, colony formation, migration and invasion of SKOV3 cells were inhibited, and the apoptosis of SKOV3 cells were enhanced significantly at 200 μmol/L and 300 μmol/L baclofen. Moreover, they changed significantly with the increase of baclofen concentration. Compared with the control group, the expression of E-cadherin and GABAB1 increased and the N-cadherin expression decreased significantly in 200 μmol/L and 300 μmol/L groups. Higher concentration of baclofen induced higher expression of E-cadherin and lower expression of N-cadherin.ConclusionBaclofen inhibited the proliferation, cloning, migration, invasion and EMT of ovarian cancer cells by activating GABAB1 receptor. These results might contribute a lot to clarify the role and possible mechanism of GABAB1 receptor in ovarian cancer.

A Study of SHR-1210± SHR-1020 Versus Chemotherapy in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer

This is a randomized, open-label, 3-arm Phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SHR-1210 alone or with SHR-1020 versus physician's choice chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer patients. All enrolled patients will be randomly divided into 3 groups and receive treatment until disease progression, intolerable toxicity，any criterion for stopping the study drug or SHR-1210 treatment for up to 2 years.