Holly Baker-Rand

Small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcaemic type causing an acute kidney injury

Summary We report a case of small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcaemic type, a rare and aggressive form of ovarian cancer, causing an acute kidney injury. A woman in her mid-30s presented with a large pelvic mass and abdominal distention, this was associated with rapidly deteriorating renal function, which did not improve with standardised kidney injury treatment. There was a high suspicion of ovarian cancer. She deteriorated and underwent emergency cytoreductive surgery, followed by systemic chemotherapy. Her presentation, acute kidney injury and electrolyte disturbance preoperatively and postoperatively suggest this was caused by her cancer. Renal dysfunction, due to paraneoplastic syndromes, is a rare oncological emergency seen with solid tumours. Awareness of the condition can lead to early recognition and timely management.

Leading causes of death after a diagnosis of endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Despite curative treatment, an endometrial cancer (EC) diagnosis is associated with an elevated risk of death compared with age-matched women in the general population. This study aimed to quantify their risk of death from EC, cardiovascular disease, and other causes. A systematic review of Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases was performed to February 2024. Studies reporting cause of death after a diagnosis of EC were included. Mortality rates and 95% CIs were calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed through visual inspection of forest plots and the I In total, 22 studies including 323,551 participants were analyzed and 102,711 (31.7%) died within 20 years of diagnosis, 62.6% (n = 64,155) from non-EC causes. In the 12 studies that reported cardiovascular death, 24.6% of participants (n = 24,309) died from cardiovascular disease. Those with local disease at presentation were more likely to die from non-EC causes than those with advanced disease at presentation (48.9% vs 13.5%). A total of 2 studies reported cause of death by ethnicity; overall, Black individuals were more likely to die than individuals of White or Other ethnicities (40.8% vs 27.9% vs 18.9%). Deaths related to non-EC causes, including cardiovascular disease, overtook EC-specific deaths >5 years after diagnosis. Significant heterogeneity was noted, despite sub-group analyses, and the findings were based on very low certainty evidence. Individuals with a history of EC are at increased risk of death from other causes. Oncology follow-up appointments provide the ideal opportunity to optimize cardiovascular risk factors to reduce preventable deaths. Future research needs to reflect the global majority.

Investigating the acceptability of cervical screening, using conventional clinician-taken cervical samples or urine self-sampling, at 6 weeks postnatal: A cross-sectional questionnaire

Objectives United Kingdom (UK) guidelines recommend delaying cervical screening due during pregnancy to 12 weeks postnatal, despite a lack of supporting evidence. This questionnaire-based study aimed to determine the feasibility of a clinical study of cervical screening and urine self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) at 6 weeks postnatal, as pilot work suggested this would improve uptake, if offered at the routine postnatal check-up. Methods Females who were pregnant/recently pregnant were invited to participate in a web-based questionnaire. Questions assessed acceptability of postnatal cervical screening at 6 weeks postnatal, analysed with chi-square, Fisher's exact and Mann–Whitney tests. Free-text responses were coded using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) to conduct a qualitative content analysis. Results Among the 454 participants, 266 (58.6%) would be more likely to undergo cervical screening if offered at 6 weeks postnatal, and an even higher proportion expressed increased willingness if urine self-sampling were offered ( n  = 338; 74.4%). Two-thirds (308/454; 67.8%) would be willing to be screened at 6 weeks postnatal for a research study and 356/454 (78.4%) if it would be limited only to urine self-sampling. When considering screening modality, over half (245/454; 54%) would prefer urine self-sampling to cervical screening, although a fifth (93/454; 21%) preferred conventional sampling. Free-text responses were provided by 279 participants, and these highlighted that affective attitude and burden TFA constructs underpinned prospective acceptability of having screening at 6 weeks postnatal. Conclusions Offering cervical screening at the 6-week postnatal check-up has potential to increase cervical screening participation. Most participants would be interested in taking part in the research. The feasibility of screening at 6 weeks postnatal and concurrent acceptability should be tested in pilot clinical studies.

Postnatal instead of normally-timed cervical screening (PINCS-1): a protocol for a feasibility study of paired-sample cervical screening and urine self-sampling at 6 weeks and 12 weeks postnatal in the UK

Introduction Cervical screening rates in the UK are falling, limiting our ability to prevent cervical cancer. Peak incidence of cervical cancer coincides with average age of childbirth, and women with young children are less likely to be screened. Current UK guidelines advise waiting 12 weeks after delivery to perform cervical screening, but this recommendation is not based on evidence from the era of liquid-based cytology or high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing. New mums suggested offering cervical screening at 6 weeks postdelivery, in conjunction with the postnatal check-up with the general practice team in primary care. This study aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a paired-sample study design for cervical screening at 6 weeks and 12 weeks postnatal. Methods and analysis A study of 100 participants will be performed to assess feasibility and acceptability of cervical screening at both 6 weeks and 12 weeks postnatal, with urine self-sampling using a Colli-pee collection device at each time point. This will inform whether women are prepared to undergo cervical screening at 6 weeks postnatal and the feasibility of a future pair-wise diagnostic test accuracy (of HPV and abnormal cervical cytology) study or whether alternative study designs are needed. Participants must be aged 24.5–64 years old and eligible for the National Health Service Cervical Screening Programme (NHS CSP). At each appointment, participants will complete a questionnaire about their experience and thoughts regarding screening. Substudies ask participants who withdraw or decline to participate their reasons, to identify barriers. The study will be closed for recruitment once 100 participants have completed the 6-week screen in Postnatal Instead of Normally-Timed Cervical Screening (PINCS-1) or if recruitment is poor and 50% not recruited by 6 months, indicating that a paired-sample design is not feasible. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval for PINCS-1 was given by the Stanmore Research Ethics Committee. The results, including participant feedback at each stage, built into the trial design, will inform the design of large studies to determine accuracy and clinical impact of cervical screening at 6 weeks postnatal, identifying whether giving choice (eg, from timing of appointments and/or offering self-sampling) will improve screening uptake. Data will inform the sample size needed for future studies to have adequate power. Results will also inform future NHS CSP management. Results will be shared via scientific publication and via conventional and social media channels accessed by young women. Trial registration number ISRCTN10071810 .