Hidekatsu Nakai

Long-term progression-free survivors (“super responders”) to olaparib maintenance in recurrent ovarian cancer: a multicenter real-world study (KCOG-G2101s)

PARP inhibitors have been shown to improve progression-free survival in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. However, their potential for long-term response and cure remains unclear in real-world practice. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study of patients with recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer who were treated with olaparib maintenance therapy in the Kansai Clinical Oncology Group. We analyzed clinical outcomes according to histological tissue type, platinum sensitivity, BRCA mutation status, and SLFN11 expression. Epithelial ovarian cancers were classified into type I (low-grade serous carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, low-grade endometrioid carcinoma) and type II (high-grade serous carcinoma, high-grade endometrioid carcinoma and undifferentiated carcinoma). A total of 72 patients were registered. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 12.0 and 42.0 months, respectively. Type II tumors exhibited significantly longer progression-free survival than type I tumors (p = 0.027). Among type II tumors, those with platinum-sensitive recurrence and a response to chemotherapy (PSR-R, n = 51) had significantly better progression-free survival than non PSR-R (p < 0.0001). Notably, eight PSR-R patients (15.7%) achieved greater than five years of progression-free survival ("super responders"), and all had no evidence of disease at the last follow-up. BRCA mutations and SLFN11 expression were not associated with progression-free survival or super responders. In this real-world cohort, a subset of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer achieved durable, potentially curative responses with olaparib maintenance, regardless of their BRCA mutation status. When evaluating PARP inhibitor therapy, long-term progression-free survival should be considered a key endpoint.

Cancers associated with extraovarian endometriosis at less common/rare sites: A nationwide survey in Japan

AbstractAimEndometriosis mostly affects the ovary but can also be present outside of the ovary including the pelvic peritoneum, intestine, urinary tract and lung. In case of ovarian endometriotic cyst, an increased risk of ovarian cancer, especially of clear cell and endometrioid histology, has been reported. However, because of the rarity, cancer occurrence from endometriosis at less common sites/rare sites is poorly understood.MethodsWe conducted a nationwide survey on the less common/rare site endometriosis in 3539 authorized facilities in Japan. We requested to complete a case report form for each case, including information on the history of endometriosis, treatment for endometriosis, type of surgery, involved site(s) of cancer and endometriosis, histology of cancer, chemotherapy and outcome.ResultsOut of 1397 confirmed cases of less common/rare site endometriosis, 11 cases of rare site endometriosis‐associated cancer (RSEAC) were reported: seven of them were associated with intestinal endometriosis, three were associated with urinary tract endometriosis and one was associated with umbilical endometriosis. Interestingly, the histology was endometrioid in seven (64%) cases, and serous, seromucinous borderline, clear cell and mucinous in one case each (10%), differing from the case of ovarian endometriosis‐associated cancer, in which clear cell carcinoma are more common.ConclusionOur nationwide survey on RSEAC has revealed that: (i) the incidence of malignant transformation may be lower than ovarian endometriosis, (ii) malignant transformation from endometriosis outside the abdominal cavity may be extremely rare and (iii) the histology of RSEAC is predominantly endometrioid type, suggesting an association of a hormonal effect.

Histopathological subtyping of high-grade serous ovarian cancer using whole slide imaging

We have established 4 histopathologic subtyping of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) and reported that the mesenchymal transition (MT) type has a worse prognosis than the other subtypes. In this study, we modified the histopathologic subtyping algorithm to achieve high interobserver agreement in whole slide imaging (WSI) and to characterize the tumor biology of MT type for treatment individualization. Four observers performed histopathological subtyping using WSI of HGSOC in The Cancer Genome Atlas data. As a validation set, cases from Kindai and Kyoto Universities were independently evaluated by the 4 observers to determine concordance rates. In addition, genes highly expressed in MT type were examined by gene ontology term analysis. Immunohistochemistry was also performed to validate the pathway analysis. After algorithm modification, the kappa coefficient, which indicates interobserver agreement, was greater than 0.5 (moderate agreement) for the 4 classifications and greater than 0.7 (substantial agreement) for the 2 classifications (MT vs. non-MT). Gene expression analysis showed that gene ontology terms related to angiogenesis and immune response were enriched in the genes highly expressed in the MT type. CD31 positive microvessel density was higher in the MT type compared to the non-MT type, and tumor groups with high infiltration of CD8/CD103 positive immune cells were observed in the MT type. We developed an algorithm for reproducible histopathologic subtyping classification of HGSOC using WSI. The results of this study may be useful for treatment individualization of HGSOC, including angiogenesis inhibitors and immunotherapy.

Nivolumab Versus Gemcitabine or Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin for Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer: Open-Label, Randomized Trial in Japan (NINJA)

PURPOSE This phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label study investigated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab versus chemotherapy (gemcitabine [GEM] or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin [PLD]) in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eligible patients had platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer, received ≤ 1 regimen after diagnosis of resistance, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of ≤ 1. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to nivolumab (240 mg once every 2 weeks [as one cycle]) or chemotherapy (GEM 1000 mg/m2 for 30 minutes [once on days 1, 8, and 15] followed by a week's rest [as one cycle], or PLD 50 mg/m2 once every 4 weeks [as one cycle]). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate, duration of response, and safety. RESULTS Patients (n = 316) were randomly assigned to nivolumab (n = 157) or GEM or PLD (n = 159) between October 2015 and December 2017. Median OS was 10.1 (95% CI, 8.3 to 14.1) and 12.1 (95% CI, 9.3 to 15.3) months with nivolumab and GEM or PLD, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.3; P = .808). Median PFS was 2.0 (95% CI, 1.9 to 2.2) and 3.8 (95% CI, 3.6 to 4.2) months with nivolumab and GEM or PLD, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.9; P = .002). There was no statistical difference in overall response rate between groups (7.6% v 13.2%; odds ratio, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.2 to 1.3; P = .191). Median duration of response was numerically longer with nivolumab than GEM or PLD (18.7 v 7.4 months). Fewer treatment-related adverse events were observed with nivolumab versus GEM or PLD (61.5% v 98.1%), with no additional or new safety risks. CONCLUSION Although well-tolerated, nivolumab did not improve OS and showed worse PFS compared with GEM or PLD in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Niraparib in Japanese patients with heavily pretreated, homologous recombination-deficient ovarian cancer: final results of a multicenter phase 2 study

To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of niraparib in Japanese women with heavily pretreated ovarian cancer. This was the follow-up analysis of a phase 2, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study in Japanese women with homologous recombination-deficient, platinum-sensitive, relapsed, high-grade serous epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who had completed 3-4 lines of chemotherapy and were poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor naïve. Participants received niraparib (starting dose, 300 mg) once daily in continuous 28-day cycles until objective disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR), as assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Safety evaluations included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). 20 patients were enrolled in the study and included in both efficacy and safety analyses. Median total study duration was 759.5 days. Median dose intensity was 201.3 mg/day. Confirmed ORR was 60.0% (90% confidence interval [CI]=39.4-78.3); 2 patients had complete response and 10 patients had partial response. Median duration of response was 9.9 months (95% CI=3.9-26.9) and the disease control rate was 90.0% (95% CI=68.3-98.8). The most common TEAEs were anemia (n=15), nausea (n=12), and decreased platelet count (n=11). TEAEs leading to study drug dose reduction, interruption, or discontinuation were reported in 16 (80.0%), 15 (75.0%), and 2 patients (10.0%), respectively. The long-term efficacy and safety profile of niraparib was consistent with previous findings in the equivalent population in non-Japanese patients. No new safety signals were identified. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03759600.

Niraparib in Japanese patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: final results of a multicenter phase 2 study

This study evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of niraparib in Japanese patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. This was a follow-up analysis of a phase 2, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study in Japanese women with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer. Participants received niraparib (starting dose 300 mg) once daily in continuous 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was the incidence of Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia-related events (defined as the overall incidence of the MedDRA Preferred Terms "thrombocytopenia" and "platelet count decreased") occurring in the 30 days after initial administration of niraparib, and secondary endpoints included evaluation of treatment-emergent adverse events and progression-free survival. Nineteen patients (median age, 62 years; median body weight, 53.9 kg) were enrolled. As previously reported, the incidence of Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia-related events during the first 30 days of treatment was 31.6%. At data cutoff, median (range) treatment exposure was 504.0 (56-1,054) days and mean ± standard deviation dose intensity was 154.4±77.5 mg/day. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea (n=14, 73.7%), decreased platelet count (n=12, 63.2%), decreased neutrophil count (n=11, 57.9%), anemia, vomiting, and decreased appetite (all n=9, 47.4%). One patient was diagnosed with treatment-related leukemia, which resulted in death. Median (95% confidence interval) progression-free survival was 18.0 (5.6-26.7) months. Overall, the safety profile of niraparib was considered manageable in this study population of Japanese patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer and was consistent with that observed in studies of non-Japanese patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03759587.