Investigator

Herbert Yu

Researcher/Professor · University of Hawaii at Manoa, Cancer Center

HYHerbert Yu
Papers(4)
Sex Hormones, Insulin…Discovery of a Ferrop…Mendelian randomizati…Hypertension and Risk…
Collaborators(10)
Christine M Friedenre…Nicolas WentzensenLingeng LuImmaculata De VivoTracy O'MaraXiao-Ou ShuCarlotta SacerdoteKathryn L. PenneyKelli O’ConnellKimberly A. Bertrand
Institutions(9)
University Of Hawaii …University of CalgaryDivision Of Cancer Ep…Yale University Yale …QIMR Berghofer Medica…Vanderbilt University…Universita' degli Stu…Memorial Sloan Ketter…Boston University

Papers

Sex Hormones, Insulin, and Insulin-like Growth Factors in Recurrence of High-Stage Endometrial Cancer

Abstract Background: The influence of sex hormone and insulin/insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis signaling on endometrial cancer recurrence is unknown. We evaluated these pathways in a prospective cohort of Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG)0210 trial endometrial adenocarcinoma patients. Methods: Stage II–IV patients (N = 816) were included in this study. Pretreatment specimens were tested for tumor mRNA and protein expression of IGF1, IGF2, IGF-binding proteins (IGFBP)-1 and -3, insulin (IR) and IGF-I receptors (IGF1R), phosphorylated IR/IGF1R (pIGF1R/pIR), and estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR) using qPCR and IHC. Serum concentrations of insulin, IGF-I, IGFBP-3, estradiol, estrone, and sex hormone binding globulin were measured. HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for progression-free survival were calculated from Cox models adjusting for age, stage, and grade. Results: Recurrence occurred in 280 (34%) cases during a median of 4.6 years of follow-up. ER positivity (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47–0.95), IR positivity (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29–0.98), and circulating IGF-I (highest vs. lowest quartile: HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47–0.92) were inversely associated with recurrence risk. Circulating estradiol (highest vs. lowest tertile: HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.02–2.36) and pIGF1R/pIR positivity (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.02–1.92) were associated with increased recurrence risk. Conclusions: Circulating estradiol and tumor tissue phosphorylated (activated) IGR1R/IR were independently associated with higher risk of recurrence in patients with endometrial cancer. Impact: This study may inform future clinical trials of endocrine-targeted adjuvant therapies in patients with endometrial cancer that could include baseline assessment of serum and tissue biomarkers of estradiol and insulin signaling pathways.

Discovery of a Ferroptosis-Related lncRNA–miRNA–mRNA Gene Signature in Endometrial Cancer Through a Comprehensive Co-Expression Network Analysis

Background: As a newly recognized type of cell death implicated in cancer, ferroptosis plays multiple roles in tumor biology. Here, we sought to construct a prognostic framework for EC on the basis of ferroptosis-related long non-coding RNAs (FerlncRNAs), microRNAs (FermiRNAs), and mRNAs (FRGs) for endometrial cancer (EC). Methods: Transcriptomic profiles of tumors and matched clinical data for 544 EC patients were retrieved from TCGA-UCEC. A prognostic framework was generated through Cox regression, integrating ferroptosis-linked lncRNAs, miRNAs, and mRNAs. EC cases were stratified into groups with high or low predicted risk based on ferroptosis-related gene expression. The model’s prognostic utility was examined through Kaplan–Meier (K–M) analysis and receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: A prognostic model based on 16 RNAs, including 10 FerlncRNAs, 2 FermiRNAs, and 4 FRGs, was developed. Analysis using K–M plots showed that high-risk patients experienced shorter overall survival than their low-risk counterparts (p < 0.001). The model’s area under curve (AUC) values were 0.731, 0.749, and 0.768 at 1-, 3-, and 5-year time points, surpassing those of standard clinical parameters. Furthermore, in an external validation cohort, these signature RNAs were associated with EC prognosis. Conclusions: The novel ferroptosis-related lncRNA–miRNA–mRNA prognostic model provides a basis to assess clinical prognosis in EC patients.

Mendelian randomization analyses suggest a role for cholesterol in the development of endometrial cancer

AbstractBlood lipids have been associated with the development of a range of cancers, including breast, lung and colorectal cancer. For endometrial cancer, observational studies have reported inconsistent associations between blood lipids and cancer risk. To reduce biases from unmeasured confounding, we performed a bidirectional, two‐sample Mendelian randomization analysis to investigate the relationship between levels of three blood lipids (low‐density lipoprotein [LDL] and high‐density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol, and triglycerides) and endometrial cancer risk. Genetic variants associated with each of these blood lipid levels (P < 5 × 10−8) were identified as instrumental variables, and assessed using genome‐wide association study data from the Endometrial Cancer Association Consortium (12 906 cases and 108 979 controls) and the Global Lipids Genetic Consortium (n = 188 578). Mendelian randomization analyses found genetically raised LDL cholesterol levels to be associated with lower risks of endometrial cancer of all histologies combined, and of endometrioid and non‐endometrioid subtypes. Conversely, higher genetically predicted HDL cholesterol levels were associated with increased risk of non‐endometrioid endometrial cancer. After accounting for the potential confounding role of obesity (as measured by genetic variants associated with body mass index), the association between genetically predicted increased LDL cholesterol levels and lower endometrial cancer risk remained significant, especially for non‐endometrioid endometrial cancer. There was no evidence to support a role for triglycerides in endometrial cancer development. Our study supports a role for LDL and HDL cholesterol in the development of non‐endometrioid endometrial cancer. Further studies are required to understand the mechanisms underlying these findings.

Hypertension and Risk of Endometrial Cancer: A Pooled Analysis in the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium (E2C2)

Abstract Background: The incidence rates of endometrial cancer are increasing, which may partly be explained by the rising prevalence of obesity, an established risk factor for endometrial cancer. Hypertension, another component of metabolic syndrome, is also increasing in prevalence, and emerging evidence suggests that it may be associated with the development of certain cancers. The role of hypertension independent of other components of metabolic syndrome in the etiology of endometrial cancer remains unclear. In this study, we evaluated hypertension as an independent risk factor for endometrial cancer and whether this association is modified by other established risk factors. Methods: We included 15,631 endometrial cancer cases and 42,239 controls matched on age, race, and study-specific factors from 29 studies in the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium. We used multivariable unconditional logistic regression models to estimate ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to evaluate the association between hypertension and endometrial cancer and whether this association differed by study design, race/ethnicity, body mass index, diabetes status, smoking status, or reproductive factors. Results: Hypertension was associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.09–1.19). There was significant heterogeneity by study design (Phet < 0.01), with a stronger magnitude of association observed among case–control versus cohort studies. Stronger associations were also noted for pre-/perimenopausal women and never users of postmenopausal hormone therapy. Conclusions: Hypertension is associated with endometrial cancer risk independently from known risk factors. Future research should focus on biologic mechanisms underlying this association. Impact: This study provides evidence that hypertension may be an independent risk factor for endometrial cancer.

16Works
4Papers
69Collaborators

Positions

2012–

Researcher/Professor

University of Hawaii at Manoa · Cancer Center

2001–

Professor

Yale University School of Public Health · Chronic Disease Epidemiology

Education

1996

PhD

University of Toronto · Clinical Biochemistry

1990

MSc

University of Toronto · Epidemiology