Hee Seung Kim

Radiotherapy patterns of care for recurrent ovarian cancer by gynecologic and radiation oncologists: a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group study (KGOG-3064S1)

Durvalumab versus Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Recurrent Ovarian Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma (MOCCA/APGOT-OV2/GCGS-OV3): A Multicenter, Randomized, Phase 2 Trial

Abstract Purpose: The optimal treatment of recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma (rOCCC) remains unknown. This is the first randomized trial to compare durvalumab with chemotherapy in rOCCC. Patients and Methods: MOCCA is a randomized, phase 2 trial conducted in Singapore, Korea, and Australia. Eligible patients had rOCCC with recurrence after platinum-based chemotherapy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2, and no prior immune checkpoint blockade. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to durvalumab (1,500 mg every 4 weeks) or chemotherapy. Patients progressing on chemotherapy were allowed to cross over to durvalumab. The primary outcome was progression-free survival. Secondary outcomes included overall survival, objective response rates, and safety. Results: Forty-eight eligible women were assigned to durvalumab (N = 31) or chemotherapy (N = 17). The median progression-free survival was 7.6 [95% confidence interval (CI), 7.0–16.0] and 14.0 (95% CI, 7.0–32.9) weeks with durvalumab and chemotherapy, respectively (HR = 1.6; 95% CI, 0.8–3.0; P = 0.92). The median overall survival was 37.9 (95% CI, 21.7–143.0) and 40.6 (95% CI, 25.0–not reached) weeks, respectively (HR = 1.5; 95% CI, 0.7–3.3; P = 0.85). The difference in objective response rates between the groups was not statistically significant (durvalumab 9.7% vs. physician’s choice chemotherapy 18.8%; difference −9.1%; 95% CI, −31.3% to 12.9%; P = 0.83). Fewer all-grade (35.5% vs. 68.8%) and high-grade (9.7% vs. 31.3%) treatment-related adverse events were observed for durvalumab. PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS)+ was observed in 28.9% (CPS ≥1%) and 10.5% (CPS ≥10%) of patients. PIK3CA mutations were associated with time to progression on durvalumab ≥12 weeks [relative risk (mutated vs. wild-type) 2.83; 95% CI, 1.16–14.17]. Conclusions: Durvalumab was well-tolerated but did not improve efficacy outcomes compared with chemotherapy in rOCCC.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Dual Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer: Final Analysis of TRU-D Phase II Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Abstract Purpose: This open-label, investigator-initiated, phase II study was conducted to evaluate the safety, survival, and neoadjuvant outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) combined with dual immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Patients and Methods: Between June 2019 and July 2021, 45 patients with unresectable stage III to IV EOC were enrolled. The patients received three cycles of NAC combined with durvalumab and tremelimumab. All patients underwent interval debulking surgery and received three cycles of durvalumab and adjuvant chemotherapy, followed by 12 cycles of durvalumab as maintenance therapy. The primary endpoint was the 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate; the secondary endpoints were the objective response rate after NAC, a chemotherapy response score, pathologic complete response, overall survival, and safety. The preplanned exploratory analyses assessed the lymphocyte infiltration, PD-L1 expression, and genomic profiles of pretreatment tumors. Results: The 12-month PFS rate was 65.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 52.8–not estimated (NE)], whereas the 24- and 30-month PFS rates were 38.6% (95% CI, 26.7–NE) and 36.4% (95% CI, 24.7–NE), respectively. After NAC, the objective response rate was 86.7%, whereas 14 patients (31.1%) had a chemotherapy response score of three, and five (11.1%) achieved pathologic complete response. The 30-month overall survival rate was 87.7%. The most common grade ≥3 adverse event was neutropenia (26.7%). In an exploratory analysis, patients with pre-NAC tumors showing PD-L1 (combined positive score) ≥1, high Mutation Signature 3, and a high extracellular matrix signature demonstrated improved PFS outcomes. Conclusions: NAC combined with dual immune checkpoint inhibitors is feasible for advanced-stage EOC and shows promising activity with a durable clinical response.

Preoperative Prognostic Nutritional Index Is a Prognostic Indicator of Cancer-Specific Survival in Patients Undergoing Endometrial Cancer Surgery

The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) reflects systemic inflammation and nutritional status. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of preoperative PNI on postoperative cancer-specific survival in patients with endometrial cancer (EC). Demographic, laboratory, and clinical data were retrospectively collected from 894 patients who underwent surgical resection of EC. Preoperative PNIs were determined from the serum albumin concentration and total lymphocyte count, which were measured within 1 month before surgery. Patients were classified into high PNI (n = 619) and low PNI (n = 275) groups according to the preoperative PNI cut-off value of 50.6. The stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to reduce bias: a weighting cohort divided into high PNI (n = 615.4) and low PNI (n = 272.3) groups. The primary outcome measure was postoperative cancer-specific survival. The postoperative cancer-specific survival rate was higher in the high PNI group than the low PNI group in the unadjusted cohort (93.1% vs. 81.5%; proportion difference [95% confidence interval; 95% CI], 11.6% [6.6-16.6%]; High preoperative PNI was associated with improved postoperative cancer-specific survival in patients undergoing surgery for EC.

Reduction of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian or primary peritoneal cancer (ROCOCO): study protocol for a phase III randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Primary debulking surgery (PDS) and adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced ovarian, fallopian or primary peritoneal cancer. However, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) has been introduced as an alternative, showing similar efficacy and decreased postoperative complications compared with PDS. Although there is still no evidence for whether three or four cycles of NAC used clinically could be adequate, reducing one cycle of NAC is expected to remove more visible tumours and thereby improve prognosis. Thus, we proposed with this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of reducing one cycle of NAC for advanced ovarian, fallopian or primary peritoneal cancer. Methods This study is a prospective, multi-centre, open-label, randomized phase III trial. A total of 298 patients with advanced ovarian, fallopian or primary peritoneal cancer will be recruited and randomly assigned to either three (control group) or two cycles of NAC (experimental group). After the NAC, we will conduct IDS with maximal cytoreduction and then administer the remaining three or four cycles for a total of six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. The primary end point is progression-free survival, and the secondary end points are time to tumour progression, overall survival, tumour response after NAC, IDS and adjuvant chemotherapy, radiologic investigation after IDS, tumour response by positron emission tomography-computed tomography after NAC, quality of life, adverse events, success rate of optimal cytoreduction, surgical complexity, postoperative complications and safety of IDS. We will assess these factors at screening, at every cycle of chemotherapy, at IDS, after the completion of chemotherapy, every 3 months for the first 2 years after the planned treatment and every 6 months thereafter for 3 years. Discussion We hypothesize that reducing one cycle of NAC will contribute to more resection of visible tumours despite 10% reduction of optimal cytoreduction, which could improve survival. Moreover, two cycles of NAC may increase postoperative complications by 5% compared with three cycles, which may be acceptable. Trial registration This study has been prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on Oct. 2nd, 2018 (NCT03693248, URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03693248).

Real world effectiveness and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian, fallopian, or primary peritoneal cancer: a Korean multicenter retrospective cohort study

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with carboplatin (CD) compared with those of carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian, fallopian, or primary peritoneal cancer in a real-world setting in Korea. We enrolled relevant patients from 9 institutions. All patients received CD or CP as the second- or third-line chemotherapy in routine clinical practice during 2013-2018. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity. The secondary endpoint included the objective response rate (ORR). Overall, 432 patients (224 and 208 in the CD and CP groups, respectively) were included. With a median follow-up of 18.9 months, the median PFS was not different between the groups (12.7 vs. 13.6 months; hazard ratio, 1.161; 95% confidence interval, 0.923-1.460; p=0.202). The ORR was 74.6% and 80.1% in the CD and CP group, respectively (p=0.556). Age and surgery at relapse were independent prognostic factors. More patients in the CD group significantly experienced a grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity and hand-foot syndrome (13.8% vs. 6.3%), whereas grade 2 or more alopecia (6.2% vs. 36.1%), peripheral neuropathy (4.4% vs. 11.4%), and allergic/hypersensitivity reaction (0.4% vs. 8.5%) developed more often in the CP group. The safety and effectiveness of chemotherapy with CD in a real-world setting were consistent with the results from a randomized controlled study. The different toxicity profiles between the 2 chemotherapy (CD and CP) regimens should be considered in the clinical practice. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03562533.

A phase IA dose-escalation study of PHI-101, a new checkpoint kinase 2 inhibitor, for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer

AbstractBackgroundPHI-101 is an orally available, selective checkpoint kinase 2 (Chk2) inhibitor. PHI-101 has shown anti-tumour activity in ovarian cancer cell lines and impaired DNA repair pathways in preclinical experiments. Furthermore, the in vivo study suggests the synergistic effect of PHI-101 through combination with PARP inhibitors for ovarian cancer treatment. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of PHI-101 in platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer.MethodsChk2 inhibitor for Recurrent EpitheliAl periToneal, fallopIan, or oVarian cancEr (CREATIVE) trial is a prospective, multi-centre, phase IA dose-escalation study. Six cohorts of dose levels are planned, and six to 36 patients are expected to be enrolled in this trial.Major inclusion criteria include ≥ 19 years with histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube carcinoma, or primary peritoneal cancer. Also, patients who showed disease progression during platinum-based chemotherapy or disease progression within 24 weeks from completion of platinum-based chemotherapy will be included, and prior chemotherapy lines of more than five will be excluded. The primary endpoint of this study is to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of PHI-101.DiscussionPHI-101 is the first orally available Chk2 inhibitor, expected to show effectiveness in treating recurrent ovarian cancer. Through this CREATIVE trial, DLT and MTD of this new targeted therapy can be confirmed to find the recommended dose for the phase II clinical trial. This study may contribute to developing a new combination regimen for the treatment of ovarian cancer.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.govIdentifier:NCT04678102.

Is restaging surgery quintessential in suspected early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer? An ancillary study of the Gynecologic Oncology Research Investigators coLLaborAtion study (GORILLA-3002)

To assess the necessity of restaging surgery for patients with suspected International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I-II epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) following incomplete surgical staging. This multicenter retrospective study evaluated patients with early-stage EOC referred for restaging. These patients were diagnosed with suspected FIGO stage I-II EOC between January 2007 and November 2022 after incomplete surgical staging, and no residual region was confirmed by radiological evaluation. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined. Among the 173 patients included in the study, 56 were assigned to the no restaging surgery group, and 117 to the restaging surgery group. After restaging, 23 were upstaged to other main stage. However, PFS and OS were not significantly different between the groups, also, dividing the groups into 4 groups who underwent chemotherapy and those who did not also did not show significant differences. In multivariate analysis, histologic grade independently influenced PFS outcomes. While restaging surgery resulted in upstaging in some patients, it was not associated with significant differences in PFS or OS in this retrospective analysis. However, the omission of any additional treatment warrants careful consideration and further discussion. Nevertheless, the observation that patients who did not undergo restaging surgery but received adjuvant chemotherapy did not show significantly different prognoses highlights the need for further research to establish appropriate treatment strategies tailored to diverse patient contexts.

Current peritonectomy practice during debulking surgery in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer: a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (KGOG 4004)

Because of the possible therapeutic benefit of removing occult tumor cells, a source of recurrence and chemoresistance, total parietal peritonectomy (TPP) is an alternative treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer. Interventional studies comparing TPP with selective parietal peritonectomy (SPP) are in progress. Since surgeons skilled in TPP are essential for such trials to be conducted, this nationwide survey aimed to examine current peritonectomy practice among gynecologic oncologists in Korea. A 17-item questionnaire, developed by a surgery committee and reviewed by the scientific review board of the Korean Gynecology Oncology Group (KGOG), was distributed to 144 KGOG members. The questionnaire was divided into 3 categories: respondent demographics, peritonectomy practice during primary debulking surgery (PDS), and peritonectomy practice during interval debulking surgery (IDS). We received 88 (61.1%) valid responses. Of the valid respondents, 98.9% and 93.8% performed SPP during PDS and IDS, respectively. Only 4.9% of the respondents performed TPP during IDS. Most respondents performed peritonectomy in cases where optimal postoperative outcomes were expected. Approximately 50.6% of the respondents had performed peritonectomy independently, while the others did so in cooperation with non-gynecologic surgeons. The primary reasons for not performing TPP were concerns about morbidity and uncertainty about the clinical benefits of the procedure. SPP is the predominant technique used in both PDS and IDS in Korea. A small percentage (4.9%) of gynecologic oncologists have performed TPP during IDS. Accordingly, a study regarding the feasibility of TPP should be conducted before proceeding with a prospective clinical trial.

A randomized phase II study of secondary cytoreductive surgery in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer who have progressed on a PARP inhibitor as first-line maintenance therapy: the SOCCER-P study (KGOG 3067/JGOG 3036/APGOT-OV11)

Although two recent phase III randomized controlled trials showed survival benefits of undergoing secondary cytoreductive surgery for an initial relapse of ovarian cancer, patients who received a poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) as the first-line maintenance treatment, which is currently the standard treatment for advanced ovarian cancer, were not included in those trials. Therefore, determining an optimal treatment strategy, including secondary cytoreductive surgery, in patients whose cancer progresses even with PARPi treatment, is needed. To determine whether secondary cytoreductive surgery is beneficial in patients who have progressed on PARPi maintenance treatment. Secondary cytoreductive surgery followed by chemotherapy is superior to chemotherapy alone for patients who have progressed on PARPi maintenance treatment. The SOCCER-P study is a multicenter randomized phase II clinical trial. Patients who meet the eligibility criteria will be randomized to either undergo secondary cytoreductive surgery and subsequent platinum-based chemotherapy plus or minus bevacizumab, or to receive platinum-based chemotherapy plus or minus bevacizumab alone. Patients randomly allocated to the surgery group will undergo secondary cytoreductive surgery followed by six cycles of a physician's choice of platinum-based chemotherapy once they have recovered from surgery. The major inclusion criteria are as follows: first recurrence of disease with treatment-free interval from last platinum dose (TFIp) ≥6 months and progression during PARPi maintenance or treatment-free interval from last PARPi therapy (TFI Progression-free survival. 124 patients. Accrual completion approximately the end of 2026 and the results are expected after 2 years of follow-up in 2029. NCT05704621.

Lymphadenectomy in clinically early epithelial ovarian cancer and survival analysis (LILAC): a Gynecologic Oncology Research Investigators Collaboration (GORILLA-3002) retrospective study

This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy in patients surgically treated for clinically early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). This retrospective, multicenter study included patients with clinically early-stage EOC based on preoperative abdominal-pelvic computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging findings between 2007 and 2021. Oncologic outcomes and perioperative complications were compared between the lymphadenectomy and non-lymphadenectomy groups. Independent prognostic factors were determined using Cox regression analysis. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary outcome. Overall survival (OS) and perioperative outcomes were the secondary outcomes. In total, 586 patients (lymphadenectomy group, n=453 [77.3%]; non-lymphadenectomy groups, n=133 [22.7%]) were eligible. After surgical staging, upstaging was identified based on the presence of lymph node metastasis in 14 (3.1%) of 453 patients. No significant difference was found in the 5-year DFS (88.9% vs. 83.4%, p=0.203) and 5-year OS (97.2% vs. 97.7%, p=0.895) between the two groups. Using multivariable analysis, lymphadenectomy was not significantly associated with DFS or OS. However, using subgroup analysis, the lymphadenectomy group with serous histology had higher 5-year DFS rates than did the non-lymphadenectomy group (86.5% vs. 74.4%, p=0.048; adjusted hazard ratio=0.281; 95% confidence interval=0.107-0.735; p=0.010). The lymphadenectomy group had longer operating time (p<0.001), higher estimated blood loss (p<0.001), and higher perioperative complication rate (p=0.004) than did the non-lymphadenectomy group. In patients with clinically early-stage EOC with serous histology, lymphadenectomy was associated with survival benefits. Considering its potential harm, lymphadenectomy should be performed according to histologic subtype and subsequent chemotherapy in patients with clinically early-stage EOC. Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0007309.

Optimum selection criteria for secondary cytoreductive surgery in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: A multicenter study from the Gynecologic Oncology Research Investigators coLLaborAtion group (GORILLA‐3001)

AbstractBackgroundTo identify those most likely to benefit from secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS), we evaluated the survival outcomes and factors predictive of prognosis in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer treated at five high‐volume Korean hospitals between 2010 and 2021. Recurrence characteristics, treatment methods, and potential predictors of survival were compared between the chemotherapy and surgery groups.ResultsAmong all 670 patients, 88.1% had initial stage III/IV disease, and 215 (32.1%) underwent SCS. Among patients who underwent SCS, only those who achieved complete resection exhibited improved survival. Even in patients with residual disease &lt; 1 cm after SCS, we observed no significant survival benefit (p = 0.942). In the multivariate Cox analysis, residual disease at primary surgery, progression‐free interval, recurrence sites (≤3 regions or limited carcinomatosis), ascites, and SCS were significant predictors of survival. Meanwhile, the only factor predictive of complete resection after SCS was recurrence sites (p &lt; 0.001).ConclusionsThe benefits of SCS appear to be exclusive to cases of complete resection. We propose limited regional platinum‐sensitive recurrence (≤3 regions or limited carcinomatosis) without ascites as the optimum selection criteria for SCS.

Asian perspective on debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: An E-survey

We performed an E-survey to evaluate the practice patterns in debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer in Asia. We designed a questionnaire, including 50 questions related to debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer. The questionnaire was sent to Gynecologic Oncologic Groups in Asia from December 2016 to February 2017. A total of 253 gynecologic oncologists from Japan (58.9%), the Republic of Korea (19%), Taiwan (12.6%), and the other counties including China (7.5%), Malaysia (0.8%), Indonesia (0.8%), and Thailand (0.4%) participated in this E-survey. The median number of debulking surgeries per year was 20, and 46.8% of the respondents preferred <1 cm as the criterion for optimal debulking surgery (ODS). The most common barrier and surgical finding precluding ODS were performance status (74.3%) and disease involving the porta hepatis (71.5%). Moreover, 63.2% had a fellowship program, and only 15% or less had opportunities to receive additional training courses in general, thoracic, or urologic surgery. The median percentage of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was 30%, and the achieved rate of ODS in primary debulking surgery (PDS) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) was 65% and 80%, respectively. Most of the respondents required three to 6 h for PDS (48.6%) and IDS (58.9%). Moreover, more than 50% depended on ultra-radical surgery conducted by specialists. The ODS criteria are relatively lenient with a preference for NAC in 30% of the respondents in Asia. This trend might be associated with the dependence on aggressive surgery performed by specialists.

Establishment of a piglet model for peritoneal metastasis of ovarian cancer

Abstract Background A piglet model for peritoneal metastasis (PM) of ovarian cancer was developed. It will contribute to establishing innovative chemotherapeutical and surgical strategies without any limitation on rodent models. Methods A total of 12 four- to five-week-old piglets of 7 to 8 kg were used. Two phases of ovarian cancer cell injections were performed with laparoscopic surgery. In phase I trial, 5.0 × 106 SK-OV-3 cells in 0.1 ml suspension were inoculated into the omentum, peritoneum, and uterine horns of two piglets twice with a one-week interval. In the phase II trial, 5.0 × 106 SNU-008 cells in 0.1 ml suspension were injected only into uterine horns within the same time frame because tumor implantation after inoculation of SK-OV-3 cells was not observed at the omentum or peritoneum in the phase I trial. Modified peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score was used to monitor tumorigenesis up to 4 weeks after inoculation. Tumor tissues disseminated in the peritoneum 4 weeks after injection were used for histological examination with hematoxylin and eosin (H&amp;E) and paired-box gene 8 (PAX-8) staining. Results In the phase I trial, two piglets showed PM with modified PCI scores of 5 and 4 at 3 weeks after the first inoculation, which increased to 14 and 15 after 4 weeks, respectively. In the phase II trial, PM was detected in eight of ten piglets, which showed modified PCI scores of 6 to 12 at 4 weeks after the first inoculation. The overall incidence of PM from the total of 12 piglets after inoculation was 75%. Immunohistochemical H&amp;E and PAX-8 staining confirmed metastatic tumors. Conclusions This study provides strong evidence that piglets can be employed as a model for PM by inoculating ovarian cancer cell lines from humans. Using two cell lines, the PM rate is 75%.

Biomarker-guided targeted therapy in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (AMBITION; KGOG 3045): a multicentre, open-label, five-arm, uncontrolled, umbrella trial

Management of heavily pre-treated platinum-resistant ovarian cancer remains a therapeutic challenge. Outcomes are poor with non-platinum, single-agent chemotherapy (CT); however, molecularly targeted anticancer therapies provide new options. This open-label, investigator-initiated, phase 2 umbrella trial (NCT03699449) enrolled patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (at least 2 prior lines of CT and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0/1) to receive combination therapy based on homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status determined by archival tumour sample assessment. HRD-positive patients were randomised to either olaparib 200mg bid tablet + cediranib 30mg qd (arm 1) or olaparib 300mg bid tablet + durvalumab 1,500mg q4w (arm 2). HRD-negative patients were allocated to either durvalumab 1,500 mg q4w + pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) or topotecan or weekly paclitaxel (6 cycles; arm 3, those with PD-L1 expression) or durvalumab 1,500 mg q4w + tremelimumab 75mg q4w (4 doses) + PLD or topotecan or weekly paclitaxel (4 cycles; arm 4, those without PD-L1 expression). Arm 5 (durvalumab 1,500 mg q4w + tremelimumab 300mg [1 dose] + weekly paclitaxel [60 mg/m² D1,8,15 q4w for 4 cycles] was initiated after arm 4 completed. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1). Between Dec 2018 and Oct 2020, 70 patients (median 57 years; median 3 prior treatment lines [range 2-10]) were treated (n=16, 14, 5, 18, and 17, respectively). Overall ORR was 37.1% (26/70, 95% confidence interval=25.9, 49.5); 2 achieved complete response. ORR was 50%, 42.9%, 20%, 33.3%, and 29.4%, respectively. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 37.5%, 35.7%, 20%, 66.7%, and 35.3% of patients, respectively. No TRAEs leading to treatment discontinuation and no grade 5 TRAEs were observed. This study, the first biomarker-driven umbrella trial in platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer, suggests clinical utility with biomarker-driven targeted therapy. All treatment combinations were manageable, and without unexpected toxicities. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03699449.

Lymph Node Ratio Is a Strong Prognostic Factor in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy

To determine whether the prognostic impact of lymph node ratio (LNR), defined as the ratio between the number of positive lymph nodes and removed lymph nodes, differs between open and minimally invasive surgical approaches for radical hysterectomy (RH) in node-positive, early-stage cervical cancer. We retrospectively identified 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB1-IIA2 patients who underwent primary type C RH between 2010 and 2018. Among them, only those with pathologically proven lymph node metastases who received adjuvant radiation therapy were included. The prognostic significance of LNR was investigated according to open surgery and minimally invasive surgery (MIS). In total, 55 patients were included. The median LNR (%) was 9.524 (range, 2.083-62.500). Based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cut-off value for LNR (%) was determined as 8.831. Overall, patients with high LNR (≥8.831%; n=29) showed worse disease-free survival (DFS) than those with low LNR (<8.831%, n=26) ( In patients with node-positive, early-stage cervical cancer, high LNR was associated with a significantly higher disease recurrence rate. This relationship was further consolidated among patients who received MIS RH.

Safety and efficacy study of laparoscopic or robotic radical surgery using an endoscopic stapler for inhibiting tumour spillage of cervical malignant neoplasms evaluating survival (SOLUTION): a multi-centre, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial protocol

Abstract Background The Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program database study demonstrated that minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was inferior to abdominal radical hysterectomy in terms of disease recurrence and survival. Among risk factors related to poor prognosis after minimally invasive surgery (MIS), tumour spillage during intracorporeal colpotomy became a significant issue. Thus, we designed this trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using an endoscopic stapler for early-stage cervical cancer. Methods This trial is a prospective, multi-centre, open-label, single-arm, non-inferiority phase II study. The nine organisations will participate in this trial after the approval of the institutional review board. Major eligibility criteria include women aged 20 years or older with cervical cancer stage IB1 squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma according to the revised 2009 FIGO staging system who will undergo type B2 or C hysterectomy by MIS. The primary endpoint is the 4.5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate between abdominal radical hysterectomy and MIS using an endoscopic stapler. For calculating the sample size, we hypothesised that the 4.5-year DFS rate after MIS using an endoscopic stapler is assumed to be the same after abdominal radical hysterectomy at 90.9%, and the non-inferiority margin was 7.2%. When we consider a three-year accrual and 4.5-year follow-up, at least 13 events must happen, requiring a total of 111 patients assuming a statistical power of 80% and the one-tailed test of 5% significance. A total of 124 patients is needed, considering a drop-out rate of 10%. Discussion We expect intracorporeal colpotomy using an endoscopic stapler may prevent tumour spillage during MIS for stage IB1 cervical cancer, showing a comparable prognosis with abdominal radical surgery. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04370496; registration date, May 2020.

Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) in Patients With Relapsed Ovarian Cancer Who Have Progressed on PARP Inhibitor Maintenance

This is a randomized phase II study of secondary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer who have progressed on PARP inhibitor maintenance.

Chk2 Inhibitor for Recurrent EpitheliAl periToneal, fallopIan or oVarian cancEr (CREATIVE Phase IA Trial)

This study aims to assess the safety and tolerability of PHI-101 in patients with platinum-resistance/refractory ovarian, fallopian tubal, and primary peritoneal cancer. This study also evaluates the pharmacokinetics of PHI-101 and efficacy of PHI-101 during treating platinum-resistance/refractory ovarian, fallopian tubal, and primary peritoneal cancer. PHI-101 is a CHK2 inhibitor that is a checkpoint kinase binding specifically to CHK2, rather than CHK1, and it inhibits the DDR system by inhibiting the ATM-CHK2 pathway, which is activated in response to DSBs. When a high-grade serous ovarian (HGSO) cancer cell line and various ovarian cancer cell lines (CAOV3, OVCAR3, SK-OV-03, and SW626) were treated with PHI-101 in a non-clinical study, the therapeutic effect of PHI-101 against ovarian cancer was demonstrated by a decrease in viability of ovarian cancer cells. In addition, a stronger growth inhibition effect was observed compared to that of treatment with olaparib or rucaparib alone, and a much stronger inhibition effect was observed when concomitantly used with paclitaxel, cisplatin, and topotecan. Based on the aforementioned results of the non-clinical studies, the potential of PHI-101 as a new treatment or concomitant cytotoxic chemotherapeutics for patients with ovarian cancer who are resistant to existing antineoplastic drugs was confirmed.

Safety of Minimally Invasive Surgery Using Endoscopic Stapler in Early Stage Cervical Cancer Patients (SOLUTION)

The SOLUTION trial aims to show the efficacy and safety of performing radical hysterectomy by minimally invasive surgery using an endoscopic stapler in patients with cervical cancer stage IB1 (FIGO staging 2009) and thus to prove that minimally invasive surgery is non-inferior to open surgery.

Reduction Of Cycles of neOadjuvant Chemotherapy for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian and Primary Peritoneal Cancer

Te hypothesized that two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery would improve survival in advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian, and primary peritoneal cancer because reduction of one cycle of chemotherapy can lead to the removal of more tumor burden, compared with three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. So the investigators aim to compare survival, rate of successful optimal cytoreductive surgery, post-operative complications, and quality of life between two and three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian, and primary peritoneal cancer.

An uMbrella Study of BIomarker-driven Targeted Therapy In Patients With Platinum-resistant Recurrent OvariaN Cancer(AMBITION)

This study is a pilot study of biomarker-driven targeted therapy in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer. More specifically, this is a randomized, multi-center, open label, phase II study for Homologous Recombination Deficiency(HRD)+ patients and a biomarker-driven multiple-arm phase II study for Homologous Recombination Deficiency(HRD)- patients. This study will consist of a number of study modules (substudies), each evaluating the antitumor activity of targeted agents in patients whose tumors express specific phenotype relevant to the molecules under investigation.

Real-World Effectiveness of PLD in Platinum- Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

This retrospective multicenter study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) with carboplatin (CD) compared with carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) in patients who had disease progression longer than 6 months after first-line platinum+taxane chemotherapy for ovarian cancer in real world clinical practice.