Investigator
Fuzhou Maternity And Child Health Care Hospital
Risk Stratification for Underlying Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade (CIN)3+ in Reproductive-Age Women With Biopsy-Confirmed CIN2: Implications for Fertility-Preserving Management
Introduction Managing biopsy-confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) in women of reproductive age poses clinical challenges. Immediate treatment with large-loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) is associated with a substantial risk of adverse obstetric outcomes. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for predicting CIN3+ lesions in reproductive-aged women with biopsy-diagnosed CIN2, to inform personalized management strategies that are particularly relevant to China’s evolving fertility policies. Methods This retrospective cohort study analyzed the data from a regional cervical lesion screening database. Reproductive-aged women (<45 years) with biopsy-confirmed CIN2 who underwent subsequent LLETZ between 2016-2024 were included in the study (n=516). Pathological upgrade was defined as CIN3+ in the LLETZ specimen. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified independent risk factors for pathological upgrade. Results Following LLETZ, 18.4% (95/516) of the women had CIN3+ lesions, indicating biopsy underestimation. HPV 16 (56.3%) and HPV 52 (27.5%) were the most prevalent genotypes in CIN3+ and CIN2- groups, respectively. Multivariable analysis identified three independent predictors: liquid-based cytology (TCT) ≥HSIL (OR = 6.308; 95% CI: 2.390-16.650; P <0.001); specific HR-HPV genotypes: HPV 16 infection (OR = 2.372; 95% CI: 1.165-4.831; P =0.017) and HPV 33 infection (OR = 3.263; 95% CI: 1.035-10.292; P =0.044); endocervical curettage (ECC) ≥CIN2 (OR = 3.067; 95% CI: 1.474-6.384; P =0.003). Age did not increase the risk of developing CIN3+ lesions. Conclusion This risk-stratification model offers evidence-based guidance for optimizing individualized treatment decisions in clinical settings where fertility preservation is prioritized.
Risk Factors of Positive Endocervical Curettage and Predictive Model Construction Based on Primary Human Papillomavirus Screening
Introduction The utility and application of endocervical curettage (ECC) during colposcopy remain controversial. This study optimized ECC application for primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening in patients with high-risk (HR)-HPV. Methods This retrospective study included patients with HR-HPV, who underwent subsequent cervical biopsy and ECC from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2020. Logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The prediction model was presented as a nomogram and evaluated for discrimination and calibration. Results The additional detection rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 + lesions with ECC was 2.0% (77/3887) in patients with HR-HPV. In multivariate risk factor analysis, HPV 16 infection presented a high risk of positive ECC, followed by HPV 33, HPV 58, and HPV 31. Irrespective of the abnormal cytopathological results, positive ECC was significantly increased (all P < .001). Females with acetowhite changes on colposcopy, transformation zone (TZ) type II, TZ type III, colposcopic impression of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, or cancer were at a high risk of positive ECC. The final prediction model included significant variables from risk factor analysis, and had excellent calibration and classification capabilities, with an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.902 (95% CI, 0.881-0.922). Additionally, calibration analysis suggested consistency. Conclusion As the additional detection value of ECC is limited. A satisfactory prediction model was designed to optimize ECC application in patients with HR-HPV infection.