Hakeemah Al-Nakhle

In Silico Characterization of Pathogenic ESR2 Coding and UTR Variants as Oncogenic Potential Biomarkers in Hormone-Dependent Cancers

Background: The ESR2 gene encodes Estrogen Receptor-β1 (ERβ1), a putative tumor suppressor in hormone-dependent malignancies. Although ERβ biology has been studied extensively at the expression level, the functional impact of nonsynonymous SNPs (nsSNPs) and untranslated-region (UTR) variants in ESR2 remains underexplored. Methods: We retrieved variants from Ensembl and performed an integrative in silico assessment using PredictSNP, I-Mutant, MUpro, HOPE, MutPred2, and CScape for pathogenicity, oncogenicity and structural stability; STRING/KEGG/GO for pathway context; RegulomeDB and polymiRTS for regulatory effects; and cBioPortal for pan-cancer clinical outcomes (breast (BRCA), endometrial (UCEC), and ovarian (OV)). We evaluated effects of nsSNPs on ERβ1 stability, ligand-binding/DNA-binding domains, co-factor recruitment, and post-transcriptional regulation. Results: Across tools, 93 missense nsSNPs were consistently predicted to be deleterious. Notably, several variants were found to destabilize ERβ1, particularly within the ligand-binding domains (LBD) and DNA-binding domains (DBD). Putative oncogenic drivers R198P and D154N showed high CScape scores and very low population frequencies, consistent with pathogenicity. Several substitutions were predicted to impair coactivator binding and disrupt interactions with key transcriptional partners, including JUN, NCOA1, and SP1. At the post-transcriptional level, rs139004885 was predicted to disrupt miRNA binding, while 3′UTR rs4986938 showed strong regulatory potential and comparatively high population frequency; by contrast, most other identified SNPs were rare. Clinically, pan-cancer survival analyses indicated worse overall survival (OS) in BRCA for ESR2-Altered cases (HR ≈ 2.25; q < 0.001), but better OS in UCEC (HR ≈ 0.24; q ≈ 0.014) and OV (HR ≈ 0.29; q < 0.001), highlighting a tumor-type-specific association. Conclusions: This integrative analysis prioritizes high-impact ESR2 variants that likely impair ERβ1 structure and shows context-dependent clinical effects. Despite their generally low frequency (except for rs4986938), prospective validation linking variant class to ERβ expression and survival outcomes is needed to support biomarker development and therapeutic applications.

Integrative In Silico Analysis to Identify Functional and Structural Impacts of nsSNPs on Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 (PD-1) Protein and UTRs: Potential Biomarkers for Cancer Susceptibility

Background: Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), encoded by the PDCD1 gene, is critical in immune checkpoint regulation and cancer immune evasion. Variants in PDCD1 may alter its function, impacting cancer susceptibility and disease progression. Objectives: This study evaluates the structural, functional, and regulatory impacts of non-synonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) in the PDCD1 gene, focusing on their pathogenic and oncogenic roles. Methods: Computational tools, including PredictSNP1.0, I-Mutant2.0, MUpro, HOPE, MutPred2, Cscape, Cscape-Somatic, GEPIA2, cBioPortal, and STRING, were used to analyze 695 nsSNPs in the PD1 protein. The analysis covered structural impacts, stability changes, regulatory effects, and oncogenic potential, focusing on conserved domains and protein–ligand interactions. Results: The analysis identified 84 deleterious variants, with 45 mapped to conserved regions like the Ig V-set domain essential for ligand-binding interactions. Stability analyses identified 78 destabilizing variants with significant protein instability (ΔΔG values). Ten nsSNPs were identified as potential cancer drivers. Expression profiling showed differential PDCD1 expression in tumor versus normal tissues, correlating with improved survival in skin melanoma but limited value in ovarian cancer. Regulatory SNPs disrupted miRNA-binding sites and transcriptional regulation, affecting PDCD1 expression. STRING analysis revealed key PD-1 protein partners within immune pathways, including PD-L1 and PD-L2. Conclusions: This study highlights the significance of PDCD1 nsSNPs as potential biomarkers for cancer susceptibility, advancing the understanding of PD-1 regulation. Experimental validation and multi-omics integration are crucial to refine these findings and enhance theraputic strategies.