Guijarro Campillo Alberto Rafael

Prognostic significance of molecular classification in high-risk endometrial cancer patients undergoing sentinel lymph node mapping

The adoption of selective sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as a viable alternative to lymphadenectomy, along with the redefinition of nodal risk groups based on molecular classification, has significantly changed the management of early-stage, high-risk preoperative endometrial cancer. A retrospective, multicenter study was conducted under the auspices of the Spanish Gynecologic Oncology Group to evaluate recurrence rates and oncologic outcomes in patients stratified by molecular risk. Three groups were compared: SLNB alone (G1), SLNB combined with pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy (G2), and pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy without SLNB (G3). The primary endpoint was recurrence rate; secondary endpoints included disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), recurrence patterns. A total of 221 patients from 14 centers were included, with a median follow-up of 24.4 months (IQR 17-42). Forty-four patients (19.9 %) experienced recurrence. Relapse rates were 15.4 % in G1, 15.8 % in G2, and 22.2 % in G3 (p = 0.479). DFS rates were 84.6 % in G1, 84.1 % in G2, and 77.8 % in G3 (p = 0.56). OS rates were 94.2 %, 90.9 %, and 92.6 %, respectively (p = 0.651). Among the 44 patients with documented recurrence, seven had nodal recurrences, with only two occurring in the group managed with SLNB alone. In this study, patients with early-stage, high-risk preoperative endometrial cancer-classified by molecular subgroups-showed no significant differences in relapse rates, disease-free survival, or overall survival across the three management strategies. Further prospective studies with longer follow-up are warranted to validate these preliminary findings.

Alternatives of the pelvic sentinel lymph node migration pathway in early ovarian cancer: the simplest the best

An Easy Learning Approach to a Complex Surgical Technique: A Step-by-Step Site-Relapse Lateral Extended Endopelvic Resection (LEER)

AbstractLateral pelvic sidewall involvement by gynecological tumors has been considered traditionally an absolute contraindication to curative resection.1 Moreover, the involvement of the pelvic sidewall at the time of relapse in cervical cancer after primary or adjuvant pelvic radiation occurs in 8.3% of patients.2,3 Laterally extended endopelvic resection (LEER), based on the ontogenetic compartment theory, provides a potential surgical option for patients for whom palliative therapy is the only alternative.4 This complex and ultraradical, surgical technique allows a high rate of complete resection in more than 70% of patients with gynecological cancers and lateral pelvic sidewall involvement. An adequate selection of patients and a deep knowledge of pelvic anatomy are crucial to obtain acceptable morbimortality rates and improved overall survival in this population.5 To deconstruct this complex procedure, we show a detailed step-by-step technique to facilitate the easy learning curve of this surgical technique. We review the Höckel original technique with different site-relapse adapted steps. We provide a pedagogical high-quality video (Video 1) and anatomical outline drawings (Fig. 1) to understand lateral pelvic wall anatomy and standardize this surgical technique. Our purpose is to bring this knowledge to gynecologists and pelvic surgeons in which pelvic lateral approach may be useful beyond gynecological oncologic surgery (Table 1).

SENECA study: staging endometrial cancer based on molecular classification

Management of endometrial cancer is advancing, with accurate staging crucial for guiding treatment decisions. Understanding sentinel lymph node (SLN) involvement rates across molecular subgroups is essential. To evaluate SLN involvement in early-stage (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 I-II) endometrial cancer, considering molecular subtypes and new European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) risk classification. The SENECA study retrospectively reviewed data from 2139 women with stage I-II endometrial cancer across 66 centers in 16 countries. Patients underwent surgery with SLN assessment following ESGO guidelines between January 2021 and December 2022. Molecular analysis was performed on pre-operative biopsies or hysterectomy specimens. Among the 2139 patients, the molecular subgroups were as follows: 272 (12.7%) p53 abnormal (p53abn, 1191 (55.7%) non-specific molecular profile (NSMP), 581 (27.2%) mismatch repair deficient (MMRd), 95 (4.4%) POLE mutated (POLE-mut). Tracer diffusion was detected in, at least one side, in 97.2% of the cases; with a bilateral diffusion observed in 82.7% of the cases. By ultrastaging (90.7% of the cases) or one-step nucleic acid amplification (198 (9.3%) of the cases), 205 patients were identified with affected sentinel lymph nodes, representing 9.6% of the sample. Of these, 139 (67.8%) had low-volume metastases (including micrometastases, 42.9%; and isolated tumor cells, 24.9%) while 66 (32.2%) had macrometastases. Significant differences in SLN involvement were observed between molecular subtypes, with p53abn and MMRd groups having the highest rates (12.50% and 12.40%, respectively) compared with NSMP (7.80%) and POLE-mut (6.30%), (p=0.004); (p53abn, OR=1.69 (95% CI 1.11 to 2.56), p=0.014; MMRd, OR=1.67 (95% CI 1.21 to 2.31), p=0.002). Differences were also noted among ESGO risk groups (2.84% for low-risk patients, 6.62% for intermediate-risk patients, 21.63% for high-intermediate risk patients, and 22.51% for high-risk patients; p<0.001). Our study reveals significant differences in SLN involvement among patients with early-stage endometrial cancer based on molecular subtypes. This underscores the importance of considering molecular characteristics for accurate staging and optimal management decisions.

A restrictive stoma policy after colorectal anastomosis in ovarian cancer based on ghost ileostomy use

The incidence of anastomotic leak after colorectal anastomosis in ovarian cancer has been reported to be much lower than that in colorectal cancer patients. Regarding the use of protective manoeuvres (diverting ileostomy) as suggested by clinical guidelines, the goal should be the implementation of a restrictive stoma policy for ovarian cancer patients, given the low rate of anastomotic leakage in this population. Patients who underwent cytoreduction surgery in a single centre (University Hospital La Fe, Valencia Spain) due to ovarian cancer between January 2010 and June 2023 were classified according to two groups: a non-restrictive stoma policy group (Group A) and a restrictive stoma policy group (Group B). A total of 256 patients were included in the analysis (group A 52 % vs group B 48 %). The use of protective diverting ileostomy was lower in the restrictive stoma policy group (14 % vs 6.6 %), and the use of ghost ileostomy was 32 % vs 87 % in groups A and B, respectively (p < 0.00001). No differences were found in the anastomotic leak rate, which was 5.2 % in the non-restrictive group and 3.2 % in the restrictive stoma policy group (p = 0.54). The use of a restrictive stoma policy based on the use of ghost ileostomy reduces the rate of diverting ileostomy in patients with ovarian cancer after colorectal resection and anastomosis. Furthermore, this policy is not associated with an increased rate of anastomotic leakage nor with an increased rate of morbi-mortality related to the leak.

Conservative management of burst adbomen after interval cytoreduction surgery of ovarian carcinosarcoma

Patent Blue SLN in Early Ovarian Cancer Prospective Study (FIGO I-II) Evaluating Patent Blue SLN Mapping. Injection Into IP/UO Ligaments in Situ. Goals: Assess Feasibility and Accuracy vs Standard Lymphadenectomy to Minimize Surgical Morbidity

the standard of care in case of early ovarian cancer (stage I or II) is a complete surgery. This surgery includes : hysterectomy (remove of the uterus), bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (remove of the adnexa), omentectomy (remove of the epiploon), bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy (remove of pelvic lymph nodes) and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (remove of para-aortic lymph nodes). This procedure is diagnostic, curative and prognostic surgery. In fact, it allows us provider care giver to stratify the stage of the cancer, hence we give the appropriate adjuvant therapy. However, this surgery, especially the extended lymphadenectomy, is associated with some risks: lymphocele, vessel injury, blood loss, morbidity, long recovery period ... In order to reduce these risks, we propose a sentinel lymph node biopsy. This intervention allows us to detect first lymph node relay whether pelvic or para-aortic. In our study, we chose the patent blue dye as a tracer. This tracer is widely used in oncologic surgery (for example in breast cancer) and approved but not in ovarian cancer yet. During surgery for early stage ovarian cancer, we will inject the patent blue dye on both side of the ovarian tumor. Then, we will check for first colorful lymph node, in both pelvic and para-aortic regions. We will send these dissected lymph node to pathology for analysis. Finally, we will continue the procedure as the standard of care. Our objective is to compare the results between the sentinel lymph node and the complete lymphadenectomy and to study the technique of sentinel lymph node biopsy using the blue patent dye as tracer.