Investigator

Gordon B. Mills

Professor · Oregon Health & Science University, Division of Oncological Oncology

GBMGordon B. Mills
Papers(12)
Sequential treatment …Proteogenomic insight…L1CAM is required for…Rictor orchestrates β…Peritoneal Spread of …Combining PARP with A…<i>BRCA1</i>Promoter …p85β regulates autoph…Phase Ib Dose Expansi…Phase 1 trial of nelf…Multiomic analysis of…ZBP1 antagonizes MRE1…
Collaborators(10)
Qinglei GaoDing MaYong FangZhiyong DingRobert L. ColemanJunpeng FanWenju PengAmir A. JazaeriChaoyang SunGuangnian Zhao
Institutions(5)
Ohsu Knight Cancer In…Huazhong University o…Unknown InstitutionThe US Oncology Netwo…The University Of Tex…

Papers

Sequential treatment with PARPi and WEE1i enhances antitumor immune responses in preclinical models of ovarian cancer

The antitumor activity demonstrated by DNA damage response inhibitors (DDRis) can be partially attributed to their capacity to enhance immune responses. However, the toxicity of DDRis to lymphocytes, particularly when a DDRi is combined with other treatments targeting cell cycle checkpoint kinases, indicates a need for the development of different DDRi treatment schedules. Here, we systematically assessed changes to the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) in response to DDRis across various treatment timelines in ovarian cancer. Using single-cell analysis, we found that the sequential treatment with an inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARPi), followed by an inhibitor of the cell cycle checkpoint kinase WEE1 (WEE1i), resulted in more effective cancer eradication and stronger antitumor immune responses in vivo, compared with mono- and concurrent therapy. Both sequential and concurrent treatment schedules could induce lethal DNA damage and activate the cGAS-STING pathway in cancer cells, but T cell viability was greater under sequential treatment. Proteomic analysis showed that T cells more quickly recovered from DNA damage after DDRi treatment compared with cancer cells. Both immune checkpoint therapy and CAR T cells were more effective when combined with sequential treatment compared with monotherapy treatment in a syngeneic high-grade serous ovarian cancer mouse model and in a treatment-resistant ovarian cancer patient-derived xenograft model. Our study demonstrated that sequential treatment with PARPi and WEE1i spared T cells from severe DNA damage and activated the cGAS-STING pathway in cancer cells, suggesting that antitumor immunity and control of tumor growth can be optimized through changes in treatment schedules.

Peritoneal Spread of Ovarian Cancer Harbors Therapeutic Vulnerabilities Regulated by FOXM1 and EGFR/ERBB2 Signaling

Abstract Peritoneal spread is the primary mechanism of metastasis of ovarian cancer, and survival of ovarian cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity as nonadherent spheroids and their adherence to the mesothelium of distant organs lead to cancer progression, metastasis, and mortality. However, the mechanisms that govern this metastatic process in ovarian cancer cells remain poorly understood. In this study, we cultured ovarian cancer cell lines in adherent and nonadherent conditions in vitro and analyzed changes in mRNA and protein levels to identify mechanisms of tumor cell survival and proliferation in adherent and nonadherent cells. EGFR or ERBB2 upregulated ZEB1 in nonadherent cells, which caused resistance to cell death and increased tumor-initiating capacity. Conversely, Forkhead box M1 (FOXM1) was required for the induction of integrin β1, integrin-α V, and integrin-α 5 for adhesion of cancer cells. FOXM1 also upregulated ZEB1, which could act as a feedback inhibitor of FOXM1, and caused the transition of adherent cells to nonadherent cells. Strikingly, the combinatorial treatment with lapatinib [dual kinase inhibitor of EGFR (ERBB1) and ERBB2] and thiostrepton (FOXM1 inhibitor) reduced growth and peritoneal spread of ovarian cancer cells more effectively than either single-agent treatment in vivo. In conclusion, these results demonstrate that FOXM1 and EGFR/ERBB2 pathways are key points of vulnerability for therapy to disrupt peritoneal spread and adhesion of ovarian cancer cells. Significance: This study describes the mechanism exhibited by ovarian cancer cells required for adherent cell transition to nonadherent form during peritoneal spread and metastasis.

BRCA1Promoter Methylation and Clinical Outcomes in Ovarian Cancer: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

AbstractBackgroundBRCA1 methylation has been associated with homologous recombination deficiency, a biomarker of platinum sensitivity. Studies evaluating BRCA1-methylated tubal and ovarian cancer (OC) do not consistently support improved survival following platinum chemotherapy. We examine the characteristics of BRCA1-methylated OC in a meta-analysis of individual participant data.MethodsData of 2636 participants across 15 studies were analyzed. BRCA1-methylated tumors were defined according to their original study. Associations between BRCA1 methylation and clinicopathological characteristics were evaluated. The effects of methylation on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were examined using mixed-effects models. All statistical tests were 2-sided.Results430 (16.3%) tumors were BRCA1-methylated. BRCA1 methylation was associated with younger age and advanced-stage, high-grade serous OC. There were no survival differences between BRCA1-methylated and non–BRCA1-methylated OC (median PFS = 20.0 vs 18.5 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.87 to 1.16; P = .98; median OS = 46.6 vs 48.0 months, HR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.87 to 1.18; P = .96). Where BRCA1/2 mutations were evaluated (n = 1248), BRCA1 methylation displayed no survival advantage over BRCA1/2-intact (BRCA1/2 wild-type non–BRCA1-methylated) OC. Studies used different methods to define BRCA1 methylation. Where BRCA1 methylation was determined using methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction and gel electrophoresis (n = 834), it was associated with improved survival (PFS: HR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.97; P = .02; OS: HR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.63 to 1.00; P = .05) on mixed-effects modeling.ConclusionBRCA1-methylated OC displays similar clinicopathological features to BRCA1-mutated OC but is not associated with survival. Heterogeneity within BRCA1 methylation assays influences associations. Refining these assays may better identify cases with silenced BRCA1 function and improved patient outcomes.

Phase Ib Dose Expansion and Translational Analyses of Olaparib in Combination with Capivasertib in Recurrent Endometrial, Triple-Negative Breast, and Ovarian Cancer

Abstract Purpose: On the basis of strong preclinical rationale, we sought to confirm recommended phase II dose (RP2D) for olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, combined with the AKT inhibitor capivasertib and assess molecular markers of response and resistance. Patients and Methods: We performed a safety lead-in followed by expansion in endometrial, triple-negative breast, ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer. Olaparib 300 mg orally twice daily and capivasertib orally twice daily on a 4-day on 3-day off schedule was evaluated. Two dose levels (DL) of capivasertib were planned: 400 mg (DL1) and 320 mg (DL-1). Patients underwent biopsies at baseline and 28 days. Results: A total of 38 patients were enrolled. Seven (18%) had germline BRCA1/2 mutations. The first 2 patients on DL1 experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of diarrhea and vomiting. No DLTs were observed on DL-1 (n = 6); therefore, DL1 was reexplored (n = 6) with no DLTs, confirming DL1 as RP2D. Most common treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events were anemia (23.7%) and leukopenia (10.5%). Of 32 evaluable subjects, 6 (19%) had partial response (PR); PR rate was 44.4% in endometrial cancer. Seven (22%) additional patients had stable disease greater than 4 months. Tumor analysis demonstrated strong correlations between response and immune activity, cell-cycle alterations, and DNA damage response. Therapy resistance was associated with receptor tyrosine kinase and RAS-MAPK pathway activity, metabolism, and epigenetics. Conclusions: The combination of olaparib and capivasertib is associated to no serious adverse events and demonstrates durable activity in ovarian, endometrial, and breast cancers, with promising responses in endometrial cancer. Importantly, tumor samples acquired pre- and on-therapy can help predict patient benefit.

Phase 1 trial of nelfinavir added to standard cisplatin chemotherapy with concurrent pelvic radiation for locally advanced cervical cancer

BackgroundNelfinavir (NFV), an HIV‐1 protease inhibitor, has been shown to sensitize cancer cells to chemoradiation (CRT). The objectives of this phase 1 trial were to evaluate safety and identify the recommended phase 2 dose of NFV added to concurrent CRT for locally advanced cervical cancer.MethodsTwo dose levels of NFV were evaluated: 875 mg orally twice daily (dose level 1 [DL1]) and 1250 mg twice daily (DL2). NFV was initiated 7 days before CRT and continued through CRT completion. Toxicity, radiographic responses, and pathologic responses were evaluated. Serial tumor biopsies (baseline, after NFV monotherapy, on NFV + CRT, and posttreatment) were evaluated by immunohistochemistry, NanoString, and reverse‐phase‐protein‐array analyses.ResultsNFV sensitized cervical cancer cells to radiation, increasing apoptosis and tumor suppression in vivo. Patients (n = 13) with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIA through IVA squamous cell cervical carcinoma were enrolled, including 7 patients at DL1 and 6 patients at DL2. At DL1, expansion to 6 patients was required after a patient developed a dose‐limiting toxicity, whereas no dose‐limiting toxicities occurred at DL2. Therefore, DL2 was established as the recommended phase 2 dose. All patients at DL2 completed CRT, and 1 of 6 experienced grade 3 or 4 anemia, nausea, and diarrhea. One recurrence was noted at DL2, with disease outside the radiation field. Ten of 11 evaluable patients remained without evidence of disease at a median follow‐up of 50 months. NFV significantly decreased phosphorylated Akt levels in tumors. Cell cycle and cancer pathways also were reduced by NFV and CRT.ConclusionsNFV with CRT is well tolerated. The response rate is promising compared with historic controls in this patient population and warrants further investigation.

Mitigating T cell DNA damage during PARP inhibitor treatment enhances antitumor efficacy

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) are a class of agents targeting DNA damage repair that have become standard therapy for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and multiple other solid tumors. In addition to targeting DNA damage repair, PARPis actively modulate antitumor immune responses, with efficacy being partially dependent on T cell activity. Here, we found that patient T cells sustain DNA damage during PARPi treatment, which reduces treatment efficacy. Leveraging paired pre- and posttreatment tumor samples from a clinical trial of patients with EOC treated with neoadjuvant niraparib as monotherapy, we showed that the PARPi caused DNA damage, slowed proliferation, and increased apoptosis in T cells, which we validated both in vitro and in mouse models. A genome-wide CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) knockout screen in primary human T cells identified PARP1 as the principal mediator of PARPi-induced T cell death. T cell–specific deletion of PARP1 or mutating Parp1 at its binding sites in transgenic mice led to reduced T cell DNA damage during PARPi treatment, resulting in improved efficacy of PARPis, alone or in combination with immune checkpoint inhibition. We then engineered PARPi-tolerant CAR T cells using cytosine base editing, which decreased PARPi-induced PARP1 trapping and led to reduced PARPi-induced DNA damage, resulting in superior antitumor efficacy in xenograft models compared with parental CAR T cells. This study highlights the relevance of PARPi-induced DNA damage to T cells and suggests opportunities to improve the efficacy of PARPis as monotherapy or in combination with immunotherapy.

Combination Therapy with Copanlisib and Niraparib in Patients with Recurrent Endometrial and Ovarian Cancer (COPANIRA): Efficacy, Toxicity, and Translational Insights

Abstract Purpose: Patients with recurrent endometrial or ovarian cancer have poor survival outcomes. We evaluated the clinical efficacy and toxicity of copanlisib [a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor] and niraparib [a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi)] in this patient population with translational insights. Patients and Methods: This was a phase Ib trial. Copanlisib was administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle, and niraparib was given orally once daily. Four dose levels were explored over a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) window of 28 days. The primary objective was to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of this combination. Secondary objectives included safety, objective response rate (ORR), and pharmacokinetics. Tumor biopsies were analyzed using reverse phase protein array (RPPA) to identify molecular correlates of response. Results: Thirty patients were enrolled. An RP2D was not established due to DLTs, most commonly a grade 3 maculopapular rash attributed to copanlisib. The ORR was 12.5% (95% confidence interval, 2.8%–33.6%). RPPA was performed on tumors from eight patients. PI3K pathway activity did not correlate with PI3K mutational status. Nineteen proteins were differentially expressed between patients with stable disease and those with progressive disease; many were substrates of Akt (protein kinase B), implicating downstream PI3K signaling in response. Conclusions: The combination of copanlisib and niraparib demonstrated limited tolerability, and the ORR was modest. However, functional proteomic analyses identified candidate biomarkers—particularly Akt pathway substrates—which may inform future strategies to optimize PI3K and PARPi combinations.

Clinical Trials (2)

270Works
14Papers
90Collaborators
2Trials
Cell Line, TumorNeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorOvarian NeoplasmsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmBreast NeoplasmsApoptosis

Positions

Professor

Oregon Health & Science University · Division of Oncological Oncology

Links & IDs
0000-0002-0144-9614

Scopus: 57226672963