Gloria Salvo

Neuroendocrine cervical carcinomas: genomic insights, controversies in treatment strategies, and future directions: a NeCTuR study

Neuroendocrine cervical carcinomas are rare, aggressive tumors with a high risk of early metastasis and poor survival outcomes. Despite existing therapies, over half of patients experience recurrence or progression after primary treatment, and survival after recurrence remains limited. Survival rates have not significantly improved over the past several decades, underscoring an urgent need for better therapeutic options. The rarity of neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma has precluded randomized trials, leaving treatment strategies to be guided by small retrospective studies or adapted from protocols for small cell lung cancer. However, as we gain a deeper understanding of its unique origin, genomic landscape, and biological characteristics, it has become clear that neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma requires distinct management strategies. Key questions in managing neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma remain unanswered: does adjuvant radiation therapy improve outcomes for early-stage disease? Should neoadjuvant chemotherapy be considered for patients with bulky, localized tumors? Can immunotherapy improve outcomes when added to chemoradiation in locally advanced cases? Should immunotherapy be a standard option for recurrent disease? Addressing these questions requires a thorough understanding of the unique molecular and biological characteristics of neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma and its clinical behavior. This review aims to provide an updated summary of the molecular landscape of neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma, highlighting features that distinguish it from small cell lung cancer and align with other types of cervical cancer. We discuss current treatment approaches, identify gaps in knowledge, and examine paradigm-shifting clinical trials that have significantly impacted survival outcomes in cervical cancer and small cell lung cancer, translating these insights into potential strategies for neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma. By focusing on the unique aspects of neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma, this review emphasizes the need for specialized treatment strategies for this challenging disease.

Beyond oncologic outcomes: fertility and ovarian preservation as key priorities

Early-stage, high-grade neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma

Revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) cervical cancer staging: A review of gaps and questions that remain

Recently the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for cervical cancer was published. In this most recent classification, imaging modalities and pathologic information have been added as tools to determine the final stage of the disease. Although there are many merits to this new staging for cervical cancer, including more detailed categorization of early-stage disease as well as information on nodal distribution, the classification falls short in clarifying areas of controversy in the staging system. Many unanswered questions remain and, as such, a number of gaps lead to further debate in the interpretation of relevant clinical data. Factors such as measurement of tumor size, definition of parametrial involvement, ovarian metastases, lower uterine segment extension, lymph node metastasis, and imaging modalities are explored in this review. The goal is to focus on items that deserve further discussion and clarification in the most recent FIGO staging for cervical cancer.

Tumor size in cervical cancer: an ongoing dilemma

Evaluation of PARP and PDL-1 as potential therapeutic targets for women with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas of the cervix

Women with recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer have few effective treatment options. The aim of this study was to identify potential therapeutic targets for women with this disease. Specimens from patients with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas of the cervix were identified from pathology files at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Immunohistochemical stains for PD-L1 (DAKO, clone 22-C3), mismatch repair proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2), somatostatin, and Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) were performed on sections from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks. Nuclear PARP-1 staining was quantified using the H-score with a score of <40 considered low, 40-100 moderate, and ≥100 high. Forty pathologic specimens from patients with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas of the cervix were examined (23 small cell, 5 large cell, 3 high-grade neuroendocrine, not otherwise specified, and 9 mixed). The mean age of the cohort was 43 years and the majority of patients (70%) were identified as white non-Hispanic. All 28 (100%) samples tested stained for mismatch repair proteins demonstrated intact expression, suggesting they were microsatellite stable tumors. Of the 31 samples tested for PD-L1 expression, only two (8%) of the 25 pure high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas were positive whereas three (50%) of the six mixed carcinoma tumors tested positive. Of the 11 small cell specimens tested for PARP-1, 10 (91%) showed PARP expression with six (55%) demonstrating high expression and four (36%) showing moderate expression. Somatostatin staining was negative in 18 of 19 small cell cases (95%). Pure high-grade neuroendocrine cervical carcinomas were microsatellite stable and overwhelmingly negative for PD-L1 expression. As the majority of tumors tested expressed PARP-1, inclusion of PARP inhibitors in future clinical trials may be considered.

Measurement of tumor size in early cervical cancer: an ever-evolving paradigm

The major tenets in accurately assessing tumor size in patients with early stage cervical cancer currently include physical examination, imaging studies, and pathologic evaluation. It is estimated that when comparing clinical stage based on physical examination and final pathology, the concordance diminishes as stage increases: 85.4%, 77.4%, 35.3%, and 20.5% for stage IB1, IB2, IIA, and IIB, respectively. Vaginal involvement and larger tumor diameter are considered the main causes of stage inaccuracy. When considering imaging studies, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides the highest level of accuracy in the assessment of cervical tumor size. Its accuracy in determining tumor location within the cervix is approximately 91% and in predicting tumor size 93%. MRI imaging is also significantly more accurate in measuring tumor size, delineating cervical tumor boundaries, and local tumor extension when compared with computed tomography (CT) scan. When comparing with pelvic ultrasound, the accuracy of both imaging techniques (MRI and pelvic ultrasound) in the assessment of tumor size in small versus large tumors is comparable. Pertaining to pathology, the depth of invasion should be measured by convention from the nearest surface epithelium, which equates to tumor thickness. In the setting where tumor is found both in the conization and hysterectomy specimen, the horizontal extent should be measured by summing the maximum horizontal measurement in the different specimens and the depth of invasion measured as the maximum depth in either specimen. A new pattern-based classification for endocervical adenocarcinomas recommends the description of patterns of invasion for human papillomavirus (HPV)-related adenocarcinomas as this is associated with differing risks of lymph node involvement.

Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial

Standard treatment of early cervical cancer involves a radical hysterectomy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. The existing evidence on the incidence of adverse events after minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer is either nonrandomized or retrospective. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of adverse events after minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer. The Laparoscopic Approach to Carcinoma of the Cervix trial was a multinational, randomized noninferiority trial that was conducted between 2008 and 2017, in which surgeons from 33 tertiary gynecologic cancer centers in 24 countries randomly assigned 631 women with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 stage IA1 with lymph-vascular invasion to IB1 cervical cancer to undergo minimally invasive (n = 319) or open radical hysterectomy (n = 312). The Laparoscopic Approach to Carcinoma of the Cervix trial was suspended for enrolment in September 2017 because of an increased risk of recurrence and death in the minimally invasive surgery group. Here we report on a secondary outcome measure: the incidence of intra- and postoperative adverse events within 6 months after surgery. Of 631 randomly assigned patients, 536 (85%; mean age, 46.0 years) met inclusion criteria for this analysis; 279 (52%) underwent minimally invasive radical hysterectomy, and 257 (48%) underwent open radical hysterectomy. Of those, 300 (56%), 91 (16.9%), and 69 (12.8%) experienced at least 1 grade ≥2 or ≥3 or a serious adverse event, respectively. The incidence of intraoperative grade ≥2 adverse events was 12% (34/279 patients) in the minimally invasive group vs 10% (26/257) in the open group (difference, 2.1%; 95% confidence interval, -3.3 to 7.4%; P=.45). The overall incidence of postoperative grade ≥2 adverse events was 54% (152/279 patients) in the minimally invasive group vs 48% (124/257) in the open group (difference, 6.2%; 95% confidence interval, -2.2 to 14.7%; P=.14). For early cervical cancer, the use of minimally invasive compared with open radical hysterectomy resulted in a similar overall incidence of intraoperative or postoperative adverse events.

Advanced stage (FIGO IVB) neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma

PET/CT scan improves detection of metastatic disease compared with CT scan alone in women with high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer: a NeCTuR study

To determine the optimal imaging modality for women with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix. Women with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix who had undergone a computed tomography (CT) scan and combined positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) scan within 4 weeks of each other were identified from the NeCTuR Cervical Tumor Registry. One radiologist reviewed all CT scans, and another radiologist reviewed all PET/CT scans. The radiologists denoted the presence or absence of disease at multiple sites. Each radiologist was blinded to prior reports, patient outcomes, and the readings of the other radiologist. With findings on PET/CT used as the gold standard, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for CT scans. Fifty matched CT and PET/CT scans were performed in 41 patients. For detecting primary disease in the cervix, CT scan had a sensitivity of 85%, a specificity of 46%, and an accuracy of 74%. For detecting disease spread to the liver, CT scan had a sensitivity of 80%, a specificity of 89%, and an accuracy of 86%. For detecting disease spread to the lung, CT had a sensitivity of 89%, a specificity of 68%, and an accuracy of 77%. Of the 14 patients who had scans for primary disease work-up, 4 (29%) had a change in their treatment plan due to the PET/CT scan. Had treatment been prescribed on the basis of the CT scan alone, 2 patients would have been undertreated, and 2 would have been overtreated. A CT scan is inferior to a PET/CT scan in assessment of metastatic disease in women with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix. Almost one-third of patients with newly diagnosed high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer would have received incorrect therapy had treatment planning been based solely on a CT scan. We recommend a PET/CT scan for both initial work-up and surveillance in women with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix.

Clinicopathologic characteristics, oncologic outcomes, and prognostic factors in neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma: a Neuroendocrine Cervical Tumor Registry study

To evaluate clinicopathologic features and oncologic outcomes of patients with neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma in an institutional neuroendocrine cervical tumor registry. Retrospective study including patients with neuroendocrine cervical carcinomas diagnosed between 1986 and 2022. Patients were categorized into International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 stage groups: early-stage (IA1-IB2, IIA1); locally advanced (IB3, IIA2-IVA); and advanced (IVB). Clinicopathologic characteristics and oncologic outcomes were evaluated by stage. Survival was compared between patients diagnosed in 1986-2003 and those diagnosed in 2004-2016. Progression-free and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimator. A total of 453 patients was included, 133 (29%) with early-stage, 226 (50%) with locally advanced, and 94 (21%) with advanced disease. Median age was 38 years (range 21-93). Sixty-nine percent (306/453) had pure and 32% (146/453) had mixed histology. The node positivity rate (surgical or radiological detection) was 19% (21/108) for tumors ≤2 cm, 37% (39/105) for tumors >2 to ≤4 cm, and 61% (138/226) for tumors >4 cm (p2 to ≤4 cm (p=0.0013). Receiving cisplatin/carboplatin plus etoposide (HR=0.33, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.63, p=0.0008) and receiving curative radiotherapy (HR=0.32, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.6, p=0.0004) were positive predictors of survival for patients with advanced disease. Among patients with neuroendocrine cervical carcinomas, overall survival is favorable for patients with early-stage disease. However, most patients present with locally advanced disease, and overall survival remains poor in this subgroup. For patients with advanced disease, receiving cisplatin/carboplatin plus etoposide and curative radiation therapy is associated with improved overall survival.

Impact of pelvic radiation therapy in patients with early neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma and no residual disease in the radical hysterectomy specimen: a NeCTuR study

The impact of adjuvant pelvic radiation therapy on the rate and location of recurrences was evaluated in patients with early-stage (IA1-IB2) neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma who underwent prior conization or polypectomy with no residual disease and negative nodes in the subsequent upfront radical hysterectomy specimen. As a secondary objective, disease-free and overall survival were analyzed. We searched the Neuroendocrine Cervical Tumor Registry (NeCTuR) to identify patients with clinical early-stage neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma with no residual disease in the specimen from upfront radical surgery and negative nodes. Patients who received pelvic radiation therapy were compared with those who did not, regardless of whether they received adjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria, representing 17% of all patients with clinical early-stage disease who underwent upfront radical hysterectomy included in the NeCTuR registry. The median age was 36.0 years (range 26.0-51.0). Six (22%) patients had stage IA, 20 (74%) had stage IB1, and one (4%) had stage IB2 disease. Seven (26%) patients received adjuvant radiation therapy and 20 (74%) did not. All seven patients in the radiation group and 14 (70%) in the no-radiation group received adjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.16). Fifteen percent (4/27) of patients had a recurrence, 14% (1/7) in the radiation group and 15% (3/20) in the no-radiation group (p=0.99). In the radiation group the recurrence was outside the pelvis, and in the no-radiation group, 67% (2/3) recurred outside the pelvis and 33% (1/3) recurred both inside and outside the pelvis (p=0.99). In the radiation group the 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 100% while, in the no-radiation group, the 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 81% (95% CI 61% to 100%) (p=0.99) and 80% (95% CI 58% to 100%) (p=0.95), respectively. For patients with no residual disease and negative nodes in the upfront radical hysterectomy specimen, our study did not find that pelvic radiation therapy improves survival.

Vulvar Cancer Individualized Scoring System (VCISS)

This study aims to develop a machine learning-based prediction model for patients with vulvar cancer. This model will utilize patient characteristics and disease features to determine the disease's prognosis. The scoring system will also include management information to facilitate prediction of clinical outcomes of different management strategies and potential management that would yield the best prognosis.

A Diagnostic Nomogram for Predicting Vaginal Invasion in Cervical Cancer

This study aims to develop a diagnostic nomogram based on clinical factors with the prediction values of vaginal invasion in cervical cancer to optimize the treatment plan and surgical procedures.

Ovarian Cancer Individualized Scoring System Scoring System

This project aims at creating an individualized prognostic model using patient characteristics and disease features to determine disease prognosis using machine learning technology. The model can be used to determine the optimal management plan per patient in priori and highlight risk and timing of disease recurrence.