Giuseppe Caruso

Lymphadenectomy in early-stage ovarian cancer: is there still a role?

The role of systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in presumed early-stage ovarian cancer remains controversial due to the lack of high-quality prospective evidence. No therapeutic benefit has been confirmed for systematic lymphadenectomy during surgical staging for apparent early-stage ovarian cancer. Lymphadenectomy may improve progression-free survival but has demonstrated no impact on overall survival, except for clear cell ovarian cancer, where a potential survival benefit has been suggested in retrospective studies. Systematic lymphadenectomy retains a diagnostic role in identifying occult nodal metastases (9% to 30% across series) undetected on pre-operative imaging or intra-operative assessment. The decision to perform lymphadenectomy should be individualized based on several factors, including histological sub-type, tumor grade, stage, and biomarker profile. Key considerations include the anticipated risk of lymph node metastasis, the opportunity to tailor adjuvant treatment by either omitting chemotherapy or offering maintenance targeted therapy, peri-operative morbidity, long-term sequelae impacting quality of life (eg, lower limb lymphedema), and cost-effectiveness. Systematic lymphadenectomy is guideline-recommended for high-grade tumors, including high-grade serous, high-grade endometrioid, and clear cell histologies, whereas it can be omitted in low-grade endometrioid and expansile mucinous sub-types. Its significance in low-grade serous and infiltrative mucinous ovarian cancers remains unclear, although guidelines frequently advocate for lymphadenectomy in these cases. To optimize patient selection, large-scale prospective studies with proper stratification by histotype and molecular profile are required. Emerging approaches to lymph node assessment, such as sentinel lymph node biopsy, artificial intelligence-assisted pre-operative imaging, and liquid biopsy, hold promise for improving staging accuracy.

Stereotactic radiotherapy for managing ovarian cancer oligoprogression under poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi)

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have become a new standard of care for the maintenance treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining stereotactic body radiotherapy with PARPi continuation as a strategy to treat ovarian cancer oligoprogression on PARPi. This is a multicenter retrospective study including ovarian cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy and PARPi continuation for oligoprogression under PARPi maintenance therapy between June 2012 and May 2023 in three Italian centers. PARPi treatment was continued until further disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the next-line systemic therapy-free interval. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate potential clinical outcomes predictors. 46 patients were included, with a total of 89 lesions treated over 63 radiotherapy treatments. Lymph nodes were the most frequently treated lesions (80, 89.9%), followed by visceral lesions (8, 9%) and one case with a bone lesion (1.1%). Median follow-up was 25.9 months (range 2.8-122). The median next-line systemic therapy-free interval was 12.4 months (95% CI 8.3 to 19.5). A number of prior chemotherapy lines greater than five was significantly associated with a reduced next-line systemic therapy-free interval (HR 3.21, 95% CI 1.11 to 9.32, p=0.032). At the time of analysis, 32 (69.6%) patients started a new systemic therapy regimen, while 14 (30.4%) remained on the PARPi regimen. The 2-year progression-free survival, local failure-free survival, and overall survival rates were 10.7%, 78.1%, and 76.5%, respectively. Four patients (8.7%) experienced acute toxicity with G1 gastrointestinal events. Stereotactic body radiotherapy combined with PARPi continuation may be an effective and safe strategy for managing ovarian cancer patients with oligoprogression on PARPi maintenance therapy. Prospective research is warranted to shed more light on this approach.

Fertility-Sparing Treatments in Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Review on Efficacy, Oncological Outcomes, and Reproductive Potential

Endometrial cancer (EC) affects 3–14% of women under 40 who wish to preserve their fertility. The standard treatment for EC is a hysterectomy with salpingo-oophorectomy. However, for those desiring fertility preservation, oral progestogens such as medroxy-progesterone acetate (MPA) or megestrol acetate (MA) are the most common therapies in Fertility-Sparing Treatment (FST). Other treatments include gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa), levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), and metformin plus progestin. This comprehensive review evaluates the best FST options for women with reproductive potential. PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched in June 2023 using specific keywords. Studies included in the review focused on patients with EC undergoing FST, with outcomes such as complete response rate (CRR), recurrence rate (RR), pregnancy rate (PR), and live birth rate. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 23,976 patients. In only-oral progestin trials, CRR ranged from 18% to 100%; RR ranged from 0% to 81.8%; Death Rate ranged from 0% to 3.6%. In studies combining oral progestin with LNG-IUS, CRR ranged from 55% to 87.5%; RR ranged from 0% to 41.7%; Death Rate was 0%. Most patients with Stage IA EC received MPA or MA. Fertility-related outcomes were reported in 15 studies. PR ranged from 4 to 44 patients in trials involving only oral progestins. When combining oral progestin with LNG-IUS, PR ranged from 1 to 46 patients. Progestin therapy, including oral MPA and MA, is considered safe and effective, with limited evidence supporting the use of LNG-IUS.

Rewinding the clock on positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer: does it predict prognosis in low-risk disease?

Positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer is a known risk factor for worse oncologic outcomes but is not used for staging purposes or to guide adjuvant treatment. Additionally, its prognostic impact on low-risk patients remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the role of positive peritoneal cytology in patients with endometrial cancer and focused on low-risk disease. This is a retrospective cohort study including all consecutive patients undergoing primary surgery for endometrial cancer at Mayo Clinic from 1999 to 2021. The role of positive peritoneal cytology was investigated in the entire cohort and in 2 subgroups: the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) low-risk group, including low-risk patients according to NCCN guidelines (endometrioid, grade 1-2, stage IA) and the European Society of Gynecologic Oncology/European Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology (ESGO/ESTRO/ESP) low-risk group, including low-risk patients according to ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines (as NCCN, plus no lymphovascular space invasion). Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to evaluate the association of positive peritoneal cytology with recurrence within 5 years after surgery, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed in all groups. A total of 3517 patients were included, 1911 in the NCCN low-risk group and 1832 in the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP low-risk group. Positive peritoneal cytology was found in 15.9% of the entire cohort (559/3517), 8.1% of the NCCN low-risk group (154/1911), and 7.9% of the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP low-risk group (145/1832). In both low-risk groups, 5-year recurrence-free survival was worse in patients with positive peritoneal cytology (p < .01 and p = .03, respectively), but there was no difference in overall survival. On univariate analysis, age, tumor grade, and positive peritoneal cytology were significant predictors of recurrence in both subgroups. After multivariable analysis, positive peritoneal cytology remained independently associated with recurrence (p < .01 and p = .03, respectively). Positive peritoneal cytology was an independent predictor of recurrence and was associated with worse recurrence-free survival in patients with low-risk endometrial cancer. However, overall survival was not impacted.

The prognostic impact of molecular classification in endometrial cancer that undergoes fertility-sparing treatment

No biomarkers are available to predict treatment response in patients with endometrial cancers who undergo fertility-sparing treatment. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of molecular classification. Patients with endometrial cancer who underwent fertility-sparing treatment with progestins between 2005 and 2021 were retrospectively identified. Polymerase epsilon (POLE), TP53/p53, and mismatch repair (MMR) proteins were assessed to assign patients to molecular groups: POLE mutated (POLEmut), MMR deficient (MMRd), no specific molecular profile (NSMP), and p53 abnormal (p53abn). Treatment response was classified as complete, partial, stable disease, or progressive. Response at 6 months, best response, and recurrence after complete response were evaluated by molecular class. In total, 33 patients were assigned to a molecular class and included in the analysis. Molecular testing detected 3 POLEmut (9%), 3 MMRd (9%), 25 NSMP (76%), and 2 p53abn (6%); 0 of 3 POLEmut (0%), 0 of 3 MMRd (0%), 6 of 25 NSMP (24%), and 1 of 2 p53abn (50%) achieved complete response within 6 months. In terms of best response during the entire treatment period, 2 of 3 POLEmut (67%), 2 of 3 MMRd (67%), 18 of 25 NSMP (72%), and 1 of 2 p53abn (50%) showed complete response. After complete response was achieved, 1 of 2 POLEmut (50%), 2 of 2 MMRd (100%), 14 of 18 NSMP (78%), and 0 of 1 p53abn (0%) had a recurrence. Although the small number of patients limits our findings, a lower proportion of MMRd responded to progestins than of NSMP.

Impact of molecular classification on recurrence risk in endometrial cancer patients with lymph node metastasis: multicenter retrospective study

To assess the distribution of molecular classes and their impact on the risk of recurrence in endometrial cancer patients with lymph node metastasis at the time of primary surgery. Endometrial cancer patients with lymph node micrometastasis or macrometastasis (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage IIIC) after surgical staging at five referral centers worldwide from October 2013 to September 2022 who underwent molecular classification were identified. Endometrial cancers were categorized into four molecular classes: POLE mutated, mismatch repair deficient, p53 abnormal, and no specific molecular profile. Survival analyses using Kaplan-Meier and Cox models (univariate and multivariate) were conducted to evaluate the relationship between molecular class and 5-year recurrence free survival. 131 patients were included: 55 (42.0%) no specific molecular profile, 46 (35.1%) mismatch repair deficient, 1 (0.8%) POLE mutated, and 29 (22.1%) p53 abnormal. During a 5 year follow-up period, 50 (38.2%) patients experienced a recurrence with a median time of 1.2 years (interquartile range (IQR) 0.5-1.8). Median follow-up for the remaining 81 patients was 3.1 years (IQR 1.3-4.5). Survival analysis revealed a significant difference in recurrence-free survival between no specific molecular profile, mismatch repair deficient, and p53 abnormal classes (log rank p<0.01). In a model adjusted for type of lymph node metastasis and tumor grade, the molecular class did not retain significance (p=0.13), while in a model adjusted for type of lymph node metastasis and adjuvant therapy, the molecular class retained significance (p<0.01). Among patients with stage IIIC endometrial cancer, POLE mutated tumors exhibited an extremely low prevalence, with no specific molecular profile emerging as the largest molecular subgroup. Despite the significant difference in recurrence-free survival between molecular classes, conventional histopathologic parameters retained crucial prognostic value. Our findings highlight the necessity of integrating molecular classes with pathological characteristics, rather than considering them in isolation as crucial prognostic factors in stage IIIC endometrial cancer.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Endometrial Cancer: A Cinderella Story

Uterine leiomyosarcoma

Uterine leiomyosarcoma is a rare and heterogeneous gynecological malignancy that poses a significant clinical challenge due to its aggressive nature and limited treatment options. Its multifactorial etiopathogenesis involves complex cytogenetic and molecular aberrations, including TP53, RB1, and chromothripsis-associated gene alterations. The non-specific clinical presentation, resembling other benign conditions, complicates early and accurate diagnosis, alongside intricate radiological and pathological patterns. Advanced imaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography, are employed to differentiate uterine leiomyosarcoma from benign conditions, but no single test is definitive. For FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage I uterine leiomyosarcoma, treatment consists of en bloc total hysterectomy ± bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Patients with stage II to IV disease amenable to complete resection can undergo surgery followed by adjuvant systemic therapy and/or radiotherapy. Lymphadenectomy is unnecessary in patients lacking bulky nodes. Unresectable or unsuitable cases warrant primary systemic therapy and/or radiotherapy. Managing recurrent disease requires a multimodal approach tailored to factors such as the site and number of metastases, prior radiotherapy, and resectability. Multidisciplinary management and centralization in referral centers are crucial for individualized decision-making. Ongoing research explores the intricate cytogenetic and molecular aberrations of uterine leiomyosarcoma, paving the way for personalized treatment strategies. This review, developed following the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup/European Reference Network on Rare Adult Solid Cancers guidelines, explores the clinical presentation, diagnostic challenges, and evolving therapeutic strategies for uterine leiomyosarcoma, while also highlighting variations in clinical practice worldwide.

Predictors of recurrence in early-stage cervical cancer without adjuvant treatment after radical surgery

The role of adjuvant radiotherapy after radical surgery for early-stage cervical cancer is controversial in the absence of high-risk factors. This study aimed to evaluate predictors of recurrence in patients with early-stage cervical cancer undergoing observation after radical surgery. Patients with FIGO 2018 stage I cervical cancer who underwent radical surgery without adjuvant therapy at the European Institute of Oncology, IEO (Milan, Italy) between 2010 and 2023 were retrospectively identified. Patients with high-risk factors for recurrence (positive margins, parametria, or lymph nodes) were excluded. Recurrence-free survival following surgery was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test and Cox regression analyses were performed to assess predictors of recurrence. A total of 340 patients were identified: 7 (2.0 %) stage IA1, 31 (9.1 %) IA2, 191 (56.2 %) IB1, 108 (31.8 %) IB2, and 3 (0.9 %) IB3. Twenty-two (6.5 %) patients had a recurrence. The estimated 5-year recurrence-free survival for the overall cohort was 93.5 % (95 % CI, 89.9-95.8). On multivariate analysis, factors associated with a higher risk of recurrence included tumor size ≥2 cm (HR 3.04, 95 % CI 1.26-7.35; p = 0.01) and grade 3 (HR 2.76, 95 % CI 1.1-6.9; p = 0.03). In the absence of high-risk factors, the risk of recurrence in patients with early-stage cervical cancer who did not receive adjuvant treatment after radical surgery was low overall. Patients with individual risk factors such as tumor size ≥2 cm or tumor grade 3 may be at higher risk of recurrence. Further research is warranted to redefine risk groups and tailor adjuvant treatment based on timely clinicopathological risk factors.

External validation of the annual recurrence risk model for tailored surveillance strategy in patients with cervical cancer

The annual recurrence risk model (ARRM), developed by the Surveillance in Cervical Cancer consortium and endorsed by the European Society of Gynecological Oncology, predicts the annual risk of cervical cancer recurrence. However, it lacks an external validation, which we aimed to address in the current retrospective study. We included patients with pathology confirmed T1a to T2b cervical cancers who underwent radical surgery at the European Institute of Oncology, Milan from January 2010 to December 2022. Using the ARRM risk calculator, patients were assigned a score from 0 to 100 points, which allowed classification into 5 risk groups (0, 1-25, 26-50, 51-75, and 76-100 points). Differences in 5-year disease-free survival were evaluated through log-rank tests with pairwise comparisons. Annual risk of recurrence was calculated using conditional survival analysis. Overall, 411 patients with cervical cancers were included: 0 (0.0%) scored 0 points, 149 (36.3%) scored 1 to 25 points, 224 (54.5%) scored 26 to 50 points, 37 (9.0%) scored 51 to 75 points, and 1 (0.2%) scored 76 to 100 points. The patient from 76 to 100 points was excluded from further analyses. The 5-year disease-free survival rates were 96.3% (95% CI 90.0 to 98.6), 85.7% (95% CI 80.1% to 89.9%), and 66.6% (95% CI 47.3% to 80.2%) in groups 1 to 25, 26 to 50, and 51 to 75 points, respectively (p < .01). Compared with 26 to 50 and 51 to 75 points, the annual risk of recurrence was lower in the 1 to 25 points group, at around 1% from year 1 to 5. The ARRM tool confirmed its validity in stratifying cervical cancer into groups with significantly different disease-free survival rates in an independent large population from a tertiary center. The annual risk of recurrence should be carefully considered when tailoring follow-up, always taking into account the patient's perspective.

Para-aortic lymph node recurrence in surgically treated early-stage cervical cancer without para-aortic lymph node surgical staging

The standard treatment for early-stage cervical cancer includes radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node staging ± bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy may be considered; however, its role remains controversial. The objective of this study was to assess the para-aortic lymph node recurrence rate in patients undergoing surgery for apparent early-stage cervical cancer without para-aortic lymph node surgical staging. This is a retrospective cohort study including all consecutive patients with presumed early-stage (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 IA1-IB2, IIA1) cervical cancer who underwent radical surgery at the European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy. Pelvic lymph node assessment included sentinel lymph node biopsy and/or systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy. Patients who underwent para-aortic lymphadenectomy or had an indication to receive adjuvant para-aortic radiotherapy were excluded. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate 5-year recurrence-free survival. Overall, 432 patients were included. The median age was 43.7 years (IQR 38.1-51.6). Sixteen (3.7%) patients were staged IA1 at diagnosis, 24 (5.6%) IA2, 208 (48.1%) IB1, 177 (41%) IB2, and 7 (1.6%) IIA1. At final pathology, the stage distribution was as follows: 36 (8.3%) stage IA1-IA2, 323 (74.8%) stage IB1-IB3, 17 (3.9%) stage II, and 56 (13%) stage IIIC1. Eighty-two patients (19%) underwent concurrent pelvic chemoradiotherapy, 20 (4.6%) radiotherapy alone, and 3 (0.7%) chemotherapy alone. Thirty-eight (8.8%) patients experienced a recurrence with a median time of 18 months (IQR 12-29). The median follow-up time for the remaining 394 (91.2%) patients was 70 months (IQR 36-98). Two patients (0.5%) had a recurrence in the para-aortic lymph nodes. The 5-year recurrence-free survival in the overall cohort was 90% (95% CI 87.4% to 93.3%). Given the low rate of para-aortic lymph node recurrence in surgically treated early-stage cervical cancer and the well-established peri-operative complications associated with para-aortic lymphadenectomy, our study aligns with recent evidence supporting the omission of this procedure in such patients.

Systemic therapy de-escalation in advanced ovarian cancer: a new era on the horizon?

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have sculpted the current landscape of advanced ovarian cancer treatment. With the advent of targeted maintenance therapies, improved survival rates have led to a timely interest in exploring de-intensified strategies with the goal of improving quality of life without compromising oncologic outcomes. The emerging concept of systemic treatment de-escalation would represent a new frontier in personalizing therapy in ovarian cancer. PARPi are so effective that properly selected patients treated with these agents might require less chemotherapy to achieve the same oncologic outcomes. The fundamental key is to limit de-escalation to a narrow subpopulation with favorable prognostic factors, such as patients with

Myeloid neoplasms post PARP inhibitors for ovarian cancer

The incidence of myeloid neoplasms following treatment with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) in patients with ovarian cancer has been gradually increasing over the last few years. The cumulative exposure to PARPi and the improved overall survival of patients with ovarian cancer may represent key underlying explanations behind such trend. Fortunately, the earlier introduction of PARPi in the frontline setting reduces the risk of developing secondary myeloid neoplasms. The etiopathogenesis is still unclear but is likely to be multifactorial. The first 2 years of PARPi exposure seem to be the critical window for the onset of myeloid neoplasms post PARPi, with persistent cytopenia recognized as an early warning sign. Despite intensive treatment strategies, the outcome remains poor. There is an unmet clinical need to learn how to minimize risk, make an early diagnosis, and manage myeloid neoplasms post PARPi. First, decision making regarding the optimal maintenance treatment should avoid a 'PARPi-for-all' strategy. PARPi should be used cautiously in cases of high baseline risk for myeloid neoplasms and/or patients who are less likely to have a benefit. Active surveillance, accurate differential diagnosis, and prompt hematological referral are key management pillars. This review discusses what is known on this emerging issue as well as unresolved questions.

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) in ovarian cancer: lessons learned and future directions

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) represent a new standard of care in the upfront treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer to the point that the vast majority of patients now receive a PARPi, alone or in combination with the anti-angiogenic bevacizumab, as part of their first-line maintenance therapy. The clinical benefit of PARPi is well established; however, much has changed since their introduction and several relevant questions have been raised and remain unresolved in the post-PARPi era. The decision-making process regarding the most appropriate first-line maintenance therapy could be challenging in clinical practice, especially in the homologous recombination-proficient setting, and several other factors need to be considered apart from the mutational status. Concerns regarding post-PARPi progression treatment have emerged, highlighting an unmet need to define a valid algorithm strategy. PARPi may not only compromise the response to further platinum due to cross-resistance mechanisms but the impact on subsequent non-platinum chemotherapy and surgery also remains unclear. Definitive results on the role of PARPi rechallenge are awaited, especially in the case of oligoprogression managed with locoregional treatment. Moreover, the updated overall survival data from the recurrent setting warrant caution in using PARPi as single agents for unselected patients. Several PARPi combination regimens are emerging for overcoming PARPi resistance and may become our new therapeutic armamentarium. This review discusses a set of clinically relevant issues in the PARPi era and provides a glimpse of future challenges and opportunities in ovarian cancer treatment.

Role of Circulating Biomarkers in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer (OC) is the second most common cause of death in women with gynecological cancer. Considering the poor prognosis, particularly in the case of platinum-resistant (PtR) disease, a huge effort was made to define new biomarkers able to help physicians in approaching and treating these challenging patients. Currently, most data can be obtained from tumor biopsy samples, but this is not always available and implies a surgical procedure. On the other hand, circulating biomarkers are detected with non-invasive methods, although this might require expensive techniques. Given the fervent hope in their value, here we focused on the most studied circulating biomarkers that could play a role in PtR OC.

Fertility-sparing surgery for women with stage I cervical cancer of 4 cm or larger: a systematic review

To investigate current evidence on oncological, fertility and obstetric outcomes of patients with stage I cervical cancer of 4 cm or larger undergoing fertility-sparing surgery (FSS). Systematic review of studies including women affected by stage I cervical cancer ≥4 cm who underwent FSS. Main outcome measures: disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), pregnancy rate, live birth rate, premature delivery rate. Fifteen studies met all eligibility criteria for this systematic review, involving 48 patients affected by cervical cancer ≥4 cm who completed FSS. Three patients (6.3%) experienced a recurrence and one of them (2.1%) died of disease. The 5-year DFS rate was 92.4%. The 5-year OS rate was 97.6%. A significantly shorter 5-year DFS was reported for high-risk patients (G3, non-squamous histotype, diameter ≥5 cm) compared with low-risk (74.7% vs. 100%; log-rank test, p=0.024). Data about fertility outcomes were available for 12 patients. Five patients out of 12 (41.7%) attempted to conceive with an estimated pregnancy rate of 80%, a live birth rate of 83.3% and a premature delivery rate of 20%. Women with high tumor grade, aggressive histology and tumor size ≥5 cm have a higher risk of recurrence. Oncologic outcomes are encouraging among low-risk patients; however, the lack of high-quality studies makes it difficult to draw any firm conclusions. Prospective multicentric clinical trials with a proper selection of inclusion/exclusion criteria should be conducted in women with low-risk factors, strong desire to preserve their fertility and high likelihood to conceive.

Systematic lymph node dissection during interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of systematic lymph node dissection (SyLND) at the time of interval debulking surgery (IDS) for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AEOC). Systematic literature review of studies including AEOC patients undergoing SyLND versus selective lymph node dissection (SeLND) or no lymph node dissection (NoLND) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Primary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included severe postoperative complications, lymphocele, lymphedema, blood loss, blood transfusions, operative time, and hospital stay. Nine retrospective studies met the eligibility criteria, involving a total of 1,660 patients: 827 (49.8%) SyLND, 490 (29.5%) SeLND, and 343 (20.7%) NoLND. The pooled estimated hazard ratios (HR) for PFS and OS were, respectively, 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.65-1.20; p=0.43) and 0.80 (95% CI=0.50-1.30; p=0.37). The pooled estimated odds ratios (ORs) for severe postoperative complications, lymphocele, lymphedema, and blood transfusions were, respectively, 1.83 (95% CI=1.19-2.82; p=0.006), 3.38 (95% CI=1.71-6.70; p<0.001), 7.23 (95% CI=3.40-15.36; p<0.0001), and 1.22 (95% CI=0.50-2.96; p=0.67). Despite the heterogeneity in the study designs, SyLND after NACT failed to demonstrate a significant improvement in PFS and OS and resulted in a higher risk of severe postoperative complications. PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42022303577.

Dose-dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical surgery in cervical cancer: a retrospective cohort study and systematic literature review

To evaluate the role of dose-dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy in reducing adjuvant radiotherapy in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stage IB1-IB2/IIA1 cervical cancer with disrupted stromal ring and as an alternative to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in FIGO 2018 stages IB3/IIA2. This was a retrospective cohort study including patients with FIGO 2018 stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer undergoing dose-dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy at the European Institute of Oncology in Milan, Italy between July 2014 and December 2022. Weekly carboplatin (AUC2 or AUC2.7) plus paclitaxel (80 or 60 mg/m A total of 63 patients with a median age of 42.8 years (IQR 35.3-47.9) were included: 39.7% stage IB-IB2/IIA1 and 60.3% stage IB3/IIA2. The radiological response was as follows: 81% objective response rate (17.5% complete and 63.5% partial), 17.5% stable disease, and 1.6% progressive disease. The operability rate was 92.1%. The optimal pathological response rate was 27.6%. Adjuvant radiotherapy was administered in 25.8% of cases. The median follow-up for patients who underwent radical hysterectomy was 49.7 months (IQR 16.8-67.7). The 5-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 79% (95% CI 0.63 to 0.88) and 92% (95% CI 0.80 to 0.97), respectively. Fifteen studies including 697 patients met the eligibility criteria for the systematic review. The objective response rate, operability rate, and adjuvant radiotherapy rate across studies ranged between 52.6% and 100%, 64% and 100%, and 4% and 70.6%, respectively. Dose-dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical surgery could be a valid strategy to avoid radiotherapy in stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer, especially in young patients desiring to preserve overall quality of life. Prospective research is warranted to provide robust, high-quality evidence.

Evaluation of survival and mortality in pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies: a systematic review, meta-analyses, and meta-regression study

Pelvic exenteration is a radical surgery for advanced or recurrent pelvic tumors, requiring careful patient selection and a multi-disciplinary approach. Despite advancements, it remains high-risk, with limited data on outcomes. The present meta-analysis evaluates survival, mortality, and trends to clarify its role in gynecologic oncology. A systematic search was conducted in January 2025 to identify studies on pelvic exenteration outcomes for gynecologic malignancies. Studies with at least 10 patients reporting 5-year overall survival or 30-day mortality were included. Data extracted included patient and surgical characteristics, and a scoring system based on study design, sample size, and center volume was used to include high-quality studies (score ≥3). Poisson regression models were used to analyze the associations between predictors and outcomes, with results expressed as incidence rate ratios and a 95% CI. A total of 46 studies involving 4417 patients met the inclusion criteria. Most patients underwent pelvic exenteration for cervical cancer (N = 3183). Positive pelvic and aortic nodal involvement were key predictors of reduced 5-year overall survival, decreasing by 3.9% and 5.9% per 1% increase in nodal positivity, respectively. Pelvic wall involvement also significantly reduced survival by 15.9%. The 30-day mortality rate was 5.1%, with sepsis (27.2%) being the leading cause of death. Peri-operative mortality decreased significantly over time, with each year of publication associated with a 2.6% decrease in incidence rate. However, pelvic sidewall involvement and total exenteration increased 30-day mortality by 11.5% and 0.7%, respectively. Pelvic exenteration remains a viable but high-risk option for select patients with advanced gynecologic malignancies. Pre-operative assessment and multi-disciplinary planning are essential for optimizing outcomes.

Integrating molecular classification into endometrial cancer management

Endometrial carcinoma is biologically heterogeneous. Molecular classification derived from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) identifies clinically relevant molecular subtypes, each with distinct prognostic and therapeutic implications. FIGO 2023 recognizes tumor biology in staging, and the new 2025 ESGO guidelines incorporate molecular data into risk-stratified management. This is a position paper on the incorporation of molecular classification in endometrial cancer. We focused on molecular taxonomy, diagnostic surrogates, prognostic validation, and therapeutic implications of immune and targeted agents. The five molecular subtypes (POLEmut; MMRd/MSI-H; p53abn; NSMP ER-positive; NSMP ER-negative) provide stronger prognostic discrimination than grade or histotype alone. We recommend that molecular subtype should guide adjuvant treatment de-escalation or intensification, inform the use of immunotherapy and targeted agents, and refine risk stratification beyond conventional parameters. We also discussed implementation challenges, including test standardization, reporting, equity of access, and areas of ongoing uncertainty. This position paper aims to support consistent, equitable, and biologically informed management of endometrial carcinoma in contemporary practice.

PARPi and myeloid neoplasms; the Italian MITO-MaNGO experience based on a multicentric survey

The introduction of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) in ovarian cancer has raised increasing concerns about PARPi-related myeloid neoplasms (PrMN). Therapy-related neoplasms, including myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia, account for 10%-20% of cases. Expanding PARPi indications, longer survival, and aging populations may contribute to rising PrMN incidence. Randomized clinical trials and real-world analyses show a significant risk increase, but data on individual PARPi, treatment lines, and prior therapies are limited. We evaluated PrMN incidence across 17 Italian centers using a 71-item survey distributed to MITO (Multicenter Italian Trials on Ovarian cancer) and MaNGO (Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology) centers, focusing on patients treated with PARPi outside clinical trials. Of 2320 patients (1254 BRCA-mutated), 56 (2.55%) developed MN: 35 myelodysplastic syndromes and 21 acute myeloid leukemia (2 patients had both, counted once). Among them, 31 had BRCA mutations (2.5%). Incidence by drug was: olaparib 2.5%, niraparib 2%, and rucaparib 3.4%. An unclear correlation emerged between treatment duration and PrMN risk, with a median onset of 18.9 months. Risk increased with additional therapy lines: 0.52% (first), 4.2% (second), 1.8% (third), 10.8% (fourth), and 12.2% (>fourth lines). Among PrMN cases, 4 achieved remission, 4 had partial responses, 8 progressed, and 37 died. While this survey is meant as hypotheses-generating, PrMN represent a rare but clinically relevant complication, particularly uncommon when PARPi are administered as first-line therapy. Their occurrence does not appear to be associated with the specific PARPi used or with BRCA mutation status. Early detection, monitoring, and identification of predictive factors are crucial as ovarian cancer outcomes improve and treatment exposure increases.

Progression-free survival as a surrogate of overall survival in metastatic or recurrent endometrial cancer: an EORTC gynecologic cancer group study.

The value of progression-free survival as a surrogate marker for overall survival remains a matter of debate. Herein, we evaluated the validity of progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in trials of recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Standardized treatment effects (z-scores) for progression-free-survival and overall survival were derived from reported HRs. Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) and surrogate threshold effect (STE) were calculated to assess surrogacy according to German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care guidelines. Sub-group analyses were performed by treatment modality, line of therapy, and prior radiotherapy exposure. Sixteen randomized trials encompassing 25 treatment comparisons and 10,381 patients with recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer were included. A strong correlation was observed between z Progression-free survival shows a strong but context-dependent correlation with overall survival among endometrial cancer trials. While it may serve as a valid surrogate marker, particularly in chemoimmunotherapy, its reliability varies by treatment context. These findings support the selective use of progression-free survival as a surrogate in endometrial cancer and underscore the importance of tailored endpoint strategies in oncology trial design.

Declaration on cervical cancer elimination: literature review and perspectives from early-career clinicians.

Despite effective prevention methods, cervical cancer remains one of the most incident malignancies globally. This literature review and perspectives from early-career clinicians aim to propose actionable recommendations to reduce the global burden of cervical cancer. The authors, representing the early-career clinicians and researchers, patient representatives, epidemiologists, and gynecologic oncology experts, identified 5 key pillars for cervical cancer elimination based on literature reviews and interdisciplinary discussion: (1) raising awareness of human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer; (2) ensuring evidence-based HPV communication; (3) fostering collaboration with other specialties and organizations; (4) increasing HPV vaccination rates; and (5) improving cervical cancer screening. Achieving the World Health Organization's cervical cancer elimination target by 2030 requires a comprehensive, multi-faceted approach. Our recommendations emphasize the need for targeted awareness campaigns, evidence-based communication, collaboration with various stakeholders, promotion of best practices, and keeping evidence of innovative interventions up-to-date, with intensified efforts in low- and middle-income countries where the burden is the greatest.

Cervical cancer: a new era

Cervical cancer is a major global health issue, ranking as the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide. Depending on stage, histology, and patient factors, the standard management of cervical cancer is a combination of treatment approaches, including (fertility- or non-fertility-sparing) surgery, radiotherapy, platinum-based chemotherapy, and novel systemic therapies such as bevacizumab, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates. While ambitious global initiatives seek to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem, the management of cervical cancer continues to evolve with major advances in imaging modalities, surgical approaches, identification of histopathological risk factors, radiotherapy techniques, and biomarker-driven personalized therapies. In particular, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors has dramatically altered the treatment of cervical cancer, leading to significant survival benefits in both locally advanced and metastatic/recurrent settings. As the landscape of cervical cancer therapies continues to evolve, the aim of the present review is to provide a comprehensive discussion of the current state and the latest practice-changing updates in cervical cancer.

Hormone replacement therapy in gynecological cancer survivors and BRCA mutation carriers: a MITO group survey

Early iatrogenic menopause in gynecological cancer survivors and BRCA mutation (BRCAm) carriers undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is a major health concern. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is the most effective remedy, but remains underused in clinical practice. The Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian cancer and gynecologic malignancies (MITO) group promoted a national survey to investigate the knowledge and attitudes of healthcare professionals regarding the prescription of HRT. The survey consisted of a self-administered, multiple-choice 45-item questionnaire, available online to all MITO members for 2 months starting from January 2022. A total of 61 participants completed the questionnaire (47 out of 180 MITO centers; compliance: 26.1%). Most respondents were female (73.8%), younger than 50 years (65.6%), and gynecologic oncologists (55.7%), working in public general hospitals (49.2%). An 84.4% of specialists actively discuss HRT with patients and 51.0% of patients ask the specialist for an opinion on HRT. The rate of specialists globally in favor of prescribing HRT was 22.9% for ovarian cancer, 49.1% for cervical cancer, and 8.2% for endometrial cancer patients. Most respondents (70.5%) believe HRT is safe for BRCA-mutated patients after RRSO. Nearly 70% of physicians prescribe systemic HRT, while 23.8% prefer local HRT. Most specialists recommend HRT for as long as there is a benefit and generally for up to 5 years. Real-world data suggest that many healthcare professionals still do not easily prescribe HRT for gynecological cancer survivors and BRCA mutation carriers after RRSO. Further efforts are required to implement the use of HRT in clinical practice and to support both clinicians in recommending HRT and patients in accepting it.

Gestational choriocarcinoma

Gestational choriocarcinoma accounts for 5% of gestational trophoblastic neoplasms. Approximately 50%, 25%, and 25% of gestational choriocarcinoma occur after molar pregnancies, term pregnancies, and other gestational events, respectively. The FIGO scoring system categorizes patients into low (score 0 to 6) and high risk (score 7 or more) choriocarcinoma. Single-agent and multi-agent chemotherapy are used in low- and high-risk patients, respectively. Chemotherapy for localized disease has a goal of eradication of disease without surgery and is associated with favorable prognosis and fertility preservation. Most patients with gestational choriocarcinoma are cured with chemotherapy; however, some (<5.0%) will die as a result of multi-drug resistance, underscoring the need for novel approaches in this group of patients. Although there are limited data due to its rarity, the treatment response with immunotherapy is high, ranging between 50-70%. Novel combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors with targeted therapies (including VEGFR-2 inhibitors) are under evaluation. PD-L1 inhibitors are considered a potential important opportunity for chemo-resistant patients, and to replace or de-escalate chemotherapy to avoid or minimize chemotherapy toxicity. In this review, the Rare Tumor Working Group and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer evaluated the current landscape and further perspective in the management of patients diagnosed with gestational choriocarcinoma.