Giorgia Russo

Real-life observational study on niraparib in older patients with primary tubo-ovarian cancer: a focus on safety and efficacy

Abstract Background Niraparib is approved for maintenance treatment of tubo-ovarian cancer patients, but data on older patients are limited. This retrospective study evaluated its safety and efficacy in primary advanced tubo-ovarian cancer, focusing on patients ≥ 75 years. Methods Women aged ≥ 50 years diagnosed with primary high-grade serous tubo-ovarian cancer, treated with niraparib between 2019–2023, were enrolled. Patients were stratified into three groups: A (50–64 years), B (65–74 years), and C (≥ 75 years). The primary outcome was progression-free survival. The secondary outcomes were toxicity and dose reduction. Results 127 patients were identified: 62 (48.8%) group A, 26 (20.5%) group B, and 39 (30.7%) group C. Baseline characteristics were comparable across groups, excluding a higher proportion of interval cytoreductive surgeries ( p  = 0.001), residual tumor ( p  = 0.01) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) > 1 ( p  = 0.01) in group C. Most patients started niraparib at 200 mg/day with dose reductions primarily occurred within fourth cycle. Dose reductions were observed in 77.4%, 69.2% and 56.4% of patients in groups A, B, and C, respectively ( p  = 0.08). In patients ≥ 75 years, 26 (66.7%) discontinued treatment due to disease progression (48.7%) or toxicity (17.9%). There were no significant differences in common or grade ≥ 3 adverse events between groups. Progression-free survival was 12 months (95%CI: 2.0–25.0) for group A, 29 months (95%CI: 11.0–52.0) for group B, and 16 months (95%CI: 1.0–31.0) for group C ( p  = 0.78). Conclusions Our findings suggest that niraparib is safe and well-tolerated in aged ≥ 75 years. Concerns about toxicity should not preclude the enrollment of elderly patients in treatment regiments.

The genomic trajectory of ovarian high‐grade serous carcinoma can be observed in STIC lesions

AbstractOvarian high‐grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) originates in the fallopian tube, with secretory cells carrying a TP53 mutation, known as p53 signatures, identified as potential precursors. p53 signatures evolve into serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) lesions, which in turn progress into invasive HGSC, which readily spreads to the ovary and disseminates around the peritoneal cavity. We recently investigated the genomic landscape of early‐ and late‐stage HGSC and found higher ploidy in late‐stage (median 3.1) than early‐stage (median 2.0) samples. Here, to explore whether the high ploidy and possible whole‐genome duplication (WGD) observed in late‐stage disease were determined early in the evolution of HGSC, we analysed archival formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) samples from five HGSC patients. p53 signatures and STIC lesions were laser‐capture microdissected and sequenced using shallow whole‐genome sequencing (sWGS), while invasive ovarian/fallopian tube and metastatic carcinoma samples underwent macrodissection and were profiled using both sWGS and targeted next‐generation sequencing. Results showed highly similar patterns of global copy number change between STIC lesions and invasive carcinoma samples within each patient. Ploidy changes were evident in STIC lesions, but not p53 signatures, and there was a strong correlation between ploidy in STIC lesions and invasive ovarian/fallopian tube and metastatic samples in each patient. The reconstruction of sample phylogeny for each patient from relative copy number indicated that high ploidy, when present, occurred early in the evolution of HGSC, which was further validated by copy number signatures in ovarian and metastatic tumours. These findings suggest that aberrant ploidy, suggestive of WGD, arises early in HGSC and is detected in STIC lesions, implying that the trajectory of HGSC may be determined at the earliest stages of tumour development. © 2024 The Author(s). The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Olaparib dose reduction in BRCA-mutated platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer recurrence: real-world data.

The poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib has demonstrated significant efficacy in treating patients with BRCA-mutated patients with ovarian cancer. However, adverse events, particularly hematologic toxicities, often necessitate dose reduction or treatment interruption. Our study investigates the survival outcomes associated with olaparib dose reduction in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer in a real-world setting. We conducted a retrospective analysis on patients with BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer treated with olaparib in a recurrent setting from 2019 to 2022. Patients were categorized based on dose-reduction status: no reduction (olaparib 600 mg; group 1), dose reduction level 1 (olaparib 500 mg; group 2), and dose reduction level 2 (olaparib 400 mg; group 3). These dose levels were selected by current guideline-based protocols for olaparib dose modification. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival and overall survival, while secondary endpoints included comparing the reduction rates and safety between the 3 groups. Eighty-seven patients were included, with 45 (52%) receiving dose reduction. The median progression-free survival for patients on standard dose was 27 months, compared to 28 and 32 months for groups 2 and 3, respectively (HR 1.587, 95% CI 0.673 to 2.744, p = .323). The median overall survival was 44 months for group 1, 52 for group 2, and 43 for group 3 (HR 0.737, 95% CI 0.413 to 1.317, p = .296). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 2 patients (4.7%) of group 1, leading to a dose interruption without a reduction. Fatigue (n = 15; 35.7%) and nausea (n = 14; 33.3%) have often been reported in patients on the standard dose group. In our cohort, olaparib dose reduction did not adversely affect oncological outcomes in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. These results suggest that a reduced dosing strategy is a viable option in patients experiencing treatment-related adverse events. However, these findings should be confirmed in larger clinical data.