Geoffroy Canlorbe

Impact of lymph node staging on survival in presumed early-stage ovarian cancer: a multicentric retrospective study

This study aimed to assess the impact of comprehensive staging on survival outcomes in this population. Patients who underwent surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer in one of the 14 Francogyn cancer centers between 2000 and 2020 were included in the study. The primary analysis evaluated the impact of lymphadenectomy on overall survival and recurrence-free survival. Lymph node count was analyzed as a continuous variable, and its association with survival, considered as a continuous outcome was assessed using linear regression (secondary analysis). Survival was compared using the log-rank test, and multivariate analysis was performed using a Cox model. A total of 467 patients with presumed early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer were included, of which 198 underwent complete lymphadenectomy and 266 did not. No significant association was found between lymph node staging and survival in the primary analysis, possibly due to limited statistical power and a selection bias, as patients without lymphadenectomy had more favorable disease profiles (p=0.600 and p=0.700, respectively). Complete lymphadenectomy was associated with a significantly higher risk of complications (34.5% vs. 14%, p<0.001). In secondary analysis, the number of para-aortic lymph nodes harvested was identified as an independent predictor of both overall survival and recurrence-free survival (p=0.007 and p=0.002, respectively). Histological characteristics and adjuvant chemotherapy also showed a significant correlation with improved survival outcomes. Extensive para-aortic lymphadenectomy in early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer is associated with better overall and recurrence-free survival but comes with an increased risk of complications.

Comparison of survival outcomes between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A French multicentric study

A recent randomized controlled trial has reconsidered the use of laparoscopy for treating patients with early-stage cervical cancer with radical hysterectomy (RH). We aimed to evaluate if surgical approach had an impact on surgical and oncological outcomes in these patients in a French setting. Data of 1706 patients with cervical cancer treated between 1996 and 2017 were extracted from maintained databases of 9 French University hospitals. Patients, with FIGO stage IA2 to IIB tumors, treated by radical hysterectomy were selected for further analysis. A propensity score matching was used with a ratio of 2:1 in favor of laparoscopic approach was used. The Kaplan Meier method was used to estimate the survival distribution. 34 patients treated with laparotomy were matched with 61 patients treated by minimally invasive surgery (MIS). There was no difference regarding overall survival (91 % vs 81 %, p > 0.05) or disease-free survival (82 % vs 78 %, p > 0.05). There was no difference regarding surgical outcomes with no excess of postoperative complication in patients with MIS. Hospital stay was significantly longer in patients operated on laparotomy. In our study, there was no evidence of a difference in survival between minimally invasive surgery and laparotomy in patients treated with radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.

First external validity study of the Fagotti score in ovarian cancer

Abstract Epithelial ovarian cancer is mostly discovered at the stage of peritoneal carcinosis. Complete cytoreductive surgery improves overall survival. The Fagotti score is a predictive score of resectability based on peritoneal laparoscopic exploratory. Our aim was to study the inter-observer concordance in an external validation of the Fagotti score. An observational, prospective, multicenter study was conducted using the Francogyn research network. The primary outcome was inter-observer concordance of the Fagotti score. 15 patients in which an ovarian mass was discovered were included. For each patient, the first exploratory laparoscopy before any treatment/chemotherapy was recorded. This bank of 15 videos was subject to blind review accompanied by a Fagotti score rating by 11 gynecological surgeons specializing in oncology. A total of 165 blind reviews were performed. Inter-observer concordance was very good for the Fagotti score with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.83 [95% CI 0.71; 0.93]. Inter-observer concordance for the adjusted Fagotti score, which accounts for unexplorable areas with extensive carcinomatosis, resulted in an ICC of 0.64 [95% CI 0.46; 0.82]. According to the reviewers, the three least explorable parameters were mesentery involvement, stomach infiltration and liver damage. The ICC of the explorable Fagotti score, i.e. score with deletion of the parameters most often unexplored by laparoscopy, was 0.86 [0.75–0.94]. This study confirms the reproducibility of the Fagotti score during first assessment laparoscopies in cases of advanced ovarian cancer. The explorable Fagotti score has an equivalent or better inter-observer concordance than the Fagotti score.