G. Bolomini

Fusion imaging in preoperative assessment of extent of disease in patients with advanced ovarian cancer: feasibility and agreement with laparoscopic findings

ABSTRACTObjectivesFusion imaging is an emerging technique that combines real‐time ultrasound examination with images acquired previously using other modalities, such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of fusion imaging in patients with suspicion of ovarian or peritoneal cancer. Secondary aims were: to compare the agreement of findings on fusion imaging, CT alone and ultrasound imaging alone with laparoscopic findings, in the assessment of extent of intra‐abdominal disease; and to evaluate the time required for the fusion imaging technique.MethodsPatients with clinical and/or radiographic suspicion of advanced ovarian or peritoneal cancer who were candidates for surgery were enrolled prospectively between December 2019 and September 2020. All patients underwent a CT scan and ultrasound and fusion imaging to evaluate the presence or absence of the following abdominal‐cancer features according to the laparoscopy‐based scoring model (predictive index value (PIV)): supracolic omental disease, visceral carcinomatosis on the liver, lesser omental carcinomatosis and/or visceral carcinomatosis on the lesser curvature of the stomach and/or spleen, involvement of the paracolic gutter(s) and/or anterior abdominal wall, involvement of the diaphragm and visceral carcinomatosis on the small and/or large bowel (regardless of rectosigmoid involvement). The feasibility of the fusion examination in these patients was evaluated. Agreement of each imaging method (ultrasound, CT and fusion imaging) with laparoscopy (considered as reference standard) was calculated using Cohen's kappa coefficient.ResultsFifty‐two patients were enrolled into the study. Fusion imaging was feasible in 51 (98%) of these patients (in one patient, it was not possible for technical reasons). Two patients were excluded because laparoscopy was not performed, leaving 49 women in the final analysis. Kappa values for CT, ultrasound and fusion imaging, using laparoscopy as the reference standard, in assessing the PIV parameters were, respectively: 0.781, 0.845 and 0.896 for the great omentum; 0.329, 0.608 and 0.847 for the liver surface; 0.472, 0.549 and 0.756 for the lesser omentum and/or stomach and/or spleen; 0.385, 0.588 and 0.795 for the paracolic gutter(s) and/or anterior abdominal wall; 0.385, 0.497 and 0.657 for the diaphragm; and 0.336, 0.410 and 0.469 for the bowel. The median time needed to perform the fusion examination was 20 (range, 10–40) min.ConclusionFusion of CT images and real‐time ultrasound imaging is feasible in patients with suspicion of ovarian or peritoneal cancer and improves the agreement with surgical findings when compared with ultrasound or CT scan alone. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Diagnostic performance of ultrasound in assessing the extension of disease in advanced ovarian cancer

Surgical exploration remains the gold standard for evaluating the extension of disease and predicting resectability. A laparoscopy-based scoring model was developed by Fagotti and colleagues in 2006 and updated in 2015, based on the intraoperative presence or absence of some specific cancer features. The model proved an overall accuracy rate of 77% to 100% and is considered the reference test for assessing resectability in our institution. The primary aim of the study was to analyze the agreement between preoperative ultrasound examination and laparoscopic findings in assessing the extension of intraabdominal disease using 6 parameters described by Fagotti's score. This was a prospective single-center observational study. Between January 2019 and June 2020, consecutive patients with clinical or radiological suspicion of ovarian or peritoneal cancer were assessed with preoperative ultrasound examination and assigned a score based on the 6 Fagotti score parameters (great omentum, liver surface, lesser omentum/stomach/spleen, parietal peritoneum, diaphragms, bowel disease). Presence of mesenteral retraction of the small bowel and miliary carcinomatosis on the serosa were also evaluated. Each parameter was correlated with laparoscopic findings. Concordance was calculated between ultrasound and laparoscopic parameters using Cohen's kappa. Cohen's kappa ranged from 0.70 to 0.90 for carcinomatosis on the small or large bowel, supracolic omentum, liver surface, and diaphragms. Cohen's kappa test was lower for carcinomatosis on the parietal peritoneum (k=0.63) and on the lesser omentum or lesser curvature of the stomach or spleen (k=0.54). The agreement between ultrasound and surgical predictive index value (score) was k=0.74. For the evaluation of mesenteral retraction and miliary carcinomatosis, the agreement was low (k=0.57 and k=0.36, respectively). The results of ultrasound and laparoscopy in the assessment of intraabdominal tumor spread were in substantial agreement for almost all the parameters. Ultrasound examination can play a useful role in the preoperative management of patients with ovarian cancer when used in dedicated referral centers.

Imaging in gynecological disease (27): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of recurrent ovarian stromal cell tumors

ABSTRACTObjectiveTo describe the clinical and ultrasound characteristics of recurrent granulosa cell and Sertoli–Leydig cell tumors.MethodsThis was a retrospective observational study performed at Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, IRCCS, Rome (Gemelli center), Italy. Patients with a histological diagnosis of recurrent granulosa cell tumor or Sertoli–Leydig cell tumor were identified from the database of the Department of Gynecological Oncology. Those who had undergone a preoperative ultrasound examination at the Gemelli center between 2012 and 2020 were included, and the data retrieved from the original ultrasound reports. In all of these reports, the recurrent tumors were described using International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) terminology. If a patient had more than one episode of relapse, information from all episodes was collected. If there was more than one recurrent tumor at the same ultrasound examination, all tumors were included. One expert sonographer also reviewed all available ultrasound images to identify typical ultrasound patterns using pattern recognition.ResultsWe identified 30 patients with a histological diagnosis of recurrent granulosa cell tumor (25 patients, 55 tumors) or Sertoli–Leydig cell tumor (five patients, seven tumors). All 30 had undergone at least one preoperative ultrasound examination at the Gemelli center and were included. These women had a total of 66 episodes of relapse, of which a preoperative ultrasound examination had been performed at the Gemelli center in 34, revealing 62 recurrent lesions: one in 22/34 (64.7%) episodes of relapse, two in 4/34 (11.8%) episodes and three or more in 8/34 (23.5%) episodes. Most recurrent granulosa cell tumors (38/55, 69.1%) and recurrent Sertoli–Leydig tumors (6/7, 85.7%) were classified as solid or multilocular‐solid tumors, while 8/55 (14.5%) recurrent granulosa cell tumors and 1/7 (14.3%) recurrent Sertoli–Leydig cell tumors were unilocular cysts and 9/55 (16.4%) recurrent granulosa cell tumors were multilocular cysts. The nine unilocular cysts had contents that were anechoic (n = 2) or had low‐level echogenicity (n = 7), had either smooth (n = 4) or irregular (n = 5) internal cyst walls, and ranged in largest diameter from 8 to 38 mm, with three being < 20 mm and five being 20–30 mm. On retrospective review of the images, two typical ultrasound patterns were described: small solid tumor measuring < 2 cm (15/62, 24.2%) and tumor with vascularized echogenic ground‐glass‐like content (12/62, 19.4%).ConclusionsSome granulosa cell and Sertoli–Leydig cell recurrences manifest one of two typical ultrasound patterns, while some appear as unilocular cysts. These are usually classified as benign, but in patients being followed up for a granulosa cell tumor or Sertoli–Leydig cell tumor, a unilocular cyst should be considered suspicious of recurrence. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.