Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes

Breast cancer incidence and subtype patterns among BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BRCA1 and BRCA2 are tumor suppressor genes essential for DNA repair. Mutations in these genes significantly increase breast (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC) risk, with BRCA1-positive facing a 70% BC and 40% OC lifetime risk. While guidelines for BRCA-positive are well established, recommendations for BC surveillance in BRCA-patients already diagnosed with OC remain limited. This meta-analysis evaluates BC risk post-OC in BRCA-mutated women. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed. Single-arm outcomes were pooled using meta-analysis of proportions, and survival data were synthesized using hazard ratio (HR), both with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. All analyses were conducted in R (version 4.3.2). A total of 2380 patients from 10 retrospective cohort studies were included. Among them, 181 (8%; 95% CI: 6%-11%) developed BC post-OC, with similar rates observed for BRCA1 and BRCA2-mutated (9%; 95% CI: 7%-12%). In overall survival analysis, BRCA-mutated patients who developed BC after OC had significantly improved outcomes compared to those with OC only (HR = 0.4657; P < 0.001). This meta-analysis underscores the need for tailored BC surveillance and evidence-based screening guidelines in BRCA-mutated OC survivors.

Association between ovarian tumors and exposure to assisted reproductive technologies and ovarian stimulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The question of whether assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and ovulation induction are related to a higher incidence of ovarian tumors (OTs) is still controversial in the literature. We performed a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases for case-control and cohort studies that investigated ART and ovulation induction exposure as risk factors for OT in infertile women. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were employed for all endpoints. A total of nine case-control and twelve cohort studies were included, encompassing 439,477 women. ART was not associated with a higher risk of OTs (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.86-1.29; p = 0.64; I In this systematic review and meta-analysis, ART exposure in infertile women was not associated with a higher risk of OTs in general or borderline tumors, even when accounting for study type differences.

Impact of TP53 somatic mutations on prognosis in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the sixth most common female cancer and may rank fourth in cancer mortality by 2040. TP53 mutations and aberrant p53 expression are associated to aggressive tumor subtypes and poor prognosis, reducing overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, recurrence rates (RcR) and Mortality Risk (MR). The prognostic impact of TP53 mutations in EC remains unclear. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Hazard ratios (HR) and Risk Ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were combined using random-effects models. Analyses were conducted in RStudio (v4.4.1), and heterogeneity was evaluated using the I Twenty-four studies comprising 5462 EC patients were included. TP53 mutations and aberrant p53 expression were associated with poorer outcomes. For OS, TP53 mutations had an HR of 2.27 (95% CI 1.47-3.49) and aberrant p53 had an HR of 5.01 (95% CI 2.44-10.30). For DFS, TP53 mutations had an HR of 4.20 (95% CI 1.79-9.86), while aberrant p53 had an HR of 2.17 (95% CI 1.27-3.72). TP53 mutations also increased RcR (RR: 2.88; 95% CI 2.18-3.80) and MR (RR: 2.33; 95% CI 1.11-4.88). Aberrant p53 showed a non-significant trend for recurrence (RR: 3.54; 95% CI 0.95-13.10). TP53 mutations and abnormal p53 expression in EC patients predict a poorer prognosis, characterized by increased RcR and MR, as well as lower DFS and OS.

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in endometrial cancer with high microsatellite instability: a Kaplan-Meier-derived patient data meta-analysis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of solid tumors. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials aimed to assess the survival benefit of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies in women with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) and mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR). A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases to compare PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors versus standard therapy in patients with advanced/recurrent EC. Studies were screened based on predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. We used DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Five studies including 2,739 patients were analyzed, with 627 (22.90%) having dMMR tumors. ICIs significantly improved progression-free survival (HR 0.35; 95% CI 0.28-0.44) and overall survival (HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.28-0.57) in dMMR patients. No significant difference was found in objective response rate (RR 1.72; 95% CI 0.88-3.36). The addition of immunotherapy for treating patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer with dMMR and high microsatellite instability significantly improved PFS and OS outcomes. PROSPERO (CRD22057890200).

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus carboplatin and paclitaxel compared with carboplatin and paclitaxel in primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Abstract Background Paclitaxel and carboplatin is the standard chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. However, the benefit of adding programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors to chemotherapy is still unclear. Method We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials that investigated PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus carboplatin and paclitaxel compared with carboplatin and paclitaxel in primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. We computed hazard ratios (HRs) or risk ratios (RRs) for binary endpoints, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used DerSimonian and Laird random-effect models for all endpoints. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. R, version 4.2.3, was used for statistical analyses. Results A total of three studies and 1,431 patients were included. Compared with carboplatin plus paclitaxel-based chemotherapy, progression-free survival (PFS) rate (HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.23–0.44; p &lt; 0.001) and overall survival (OS) at 30 months (RR 3.13; 95% CI 1.26–7.78; p = 0.01) were significant in favor of the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus carboplatin and paclitaxel group in the mismatch repair–deficient subgroup. However, there were no significant differences in the mismatch repair–proficient subgroup for PFS (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.50–1.08; p = 0.117) or OS at 30 months (RR 2.24; 95% CI 0.79–6.39; p = 0.13). Conclusion Immunotherapy plus carboplatin-paclitaxel increased significantly PFS and OS among patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, with a significant benefit in the mismatch repair–deficient and high microsatellite instability population.