FFFrancesca Falcone
Papers(7)
Sentinel node mapping…Sentinel SENECA risk …Fertility-sparing app…Use of Indocyanine Gr…Evaluation of periope…Role of V-Y flap reco…Fertility-sparing vs …
Collaborators(10)
F. GhezziStefano RestainoRoberto TozziGiuseppe VizzielliRobert FruscioViolante Di DonatoGiovanni ScambiaGiuseppe ParisiHelmut PlettIbrahim Yalçin
Institutions(9)
Hospital Universitari…University of InsubriaUniversity Of PisaUniversity Of PaduaUniversity of Milan B…Sapienza Università d…Fondazione Policlinic…Kliniken Essen MitteDokuz Eyll University

Papers

Sentinel node mapping in high-intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer: Analysis of 5-year oncologic outcomes

To assess 5-year oncologic outcomes of apparent early-stage high-intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer undergoing sentinel node mapping versus systematic lymphadenectomy. This is a multi-institutional retrospective, propensity-matched study evaluating data of high-intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer (according to ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines) undergoing sentinel node mapping versus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy (with and without para-aortic lymphadenectomy). Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard methods. Overall, the charts of 242 patients with high-intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer were retrieved. Data on 73 (30.1%) patients undergoing hysterectomy plus sentinel node mapping were analyzed. Forty-two (57.5%) and 31 (42.5%) patients were classified in the high-intermediate and high-risk groups, respectively. Unilateral sentinel node mapping was achieved in all patients. Bilateral mapping was achieved in 67 (91.7%) patients. Three (4.1%) patients had site-specific lymphadenectomy (two pelvic areas only and one pelvic plus para-aortic area), while adjunctive nodal dissection was omitted in the hemipelvis of the other three (4.1%) patients. Sentinel nodes were detected in the para-aortic area in eight (10.9%) patients. Twenty-four (32.8%) patients were diagnosed with nodal disease. A propensity-score matching was used to compare the aforementioned group of patients undergoing sentinel node mapping with a group of patients undergoing lymphadenectomy. Seventy patient pairs were selected (70 having sentinel node mapping vs. 70 having lymphadenectomy). Patients undergoing sentinel node mapping experienced similar 5-year disease-free survival (HR: 1.233; 95%CI: 0.6217 to 2.444; p = 0.547, log-rank test) and 5-year overall survival (HR: 1.505; 95%CI: 0.6752 to 3.355; p = 0.256, log-rank test) than patients undergoing lymphadenectomy. Sentinel node mapping does not negatively impact 5-year outcomes of high-intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer. Further prospective studies are warranted.

Sentinel SENECA risk factors for unsuccessful bi-lateral sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer

Our study aims to assess the risk factors associated with bi-lateral sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping failure in endometrial cancer. The SENECA study was a retrospective multi-center international observational study that reviewed data from 2139 women with clinical stage I-to-II endometrial cancer across 64 centers in 17 countries. Between January 2021 and December 2022, patients underwent surgical treatment with SLN assessment, following the guidelines of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology. Risk factors associated with the absence of bi-lateral mapping were analyzed using χ Among the 2139 patients, the bi-lateral lymph node detection rate was 82.7%, whereas the unilateral detection rate was 97.3%. In multi-variate analysis, 5 risk factors remained statistically associated with unsuccessful bi-lateral lymph node mapping: high-grade histology (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.79, p=.03), myometrial invasion >50% (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.75, p=.012), low-volume surgeon <20 cases/year (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.55 to 2.89, p<.01), open surgical approach (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.78 , p=.03), and non-indocyanine green tracer (OR 4.59, 95% CI 2.64 to 7.99, p<.01). The addition of bi-lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy and/or paraaortic lymphadenectomy to SLN biopsy caused an increased rate of intra-operative complications (2% vs 8.4%, p<.01) and all-grade post-operative complications (4.1% vs 11.2%, p<.01). Our study identifies 5 risk factors associated with unsuccessful lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer. Efforts should be made to perform this technique with indocyanine green, through minimally invasive surgery, and performed or supervised by an experienced surgeon with ≥20 endometrial cancer cases per year.

Fertility-sparing approach in endometrioid grade II endometrial cancer: the role of molecular classification

To investigate whether molecular classification could support individualized selection of patients with grade II endometrioid endometrial cancer for fertility-sparing approaches. This is a retrospective multi-institutional study. Data of patients undergoing fertility-sparing treatment with a levonorgestrel intrauterine device (with or without oral hormonal therapy) were retrieved. Surrogate molecular classification was used to categorize patients into 4 classes: (1) POLE-mutated, (2) mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability high, (3) p53 abnormal, and (4) no specific molecular profile. Overall, data from 23 patients with grade II endometrioid endometrial cancer starting a fertility-sparing attempt were retrieved. The median patient age was 36 (range; 30-41) years. All patients underwent hysteroscopic-guided endometrial biopsies. Hysteroscopic resection of the tumor was performed in 9 (39.1%) patients. According to surrogate molecular classification, 1 (4.3%), 2 (8.7%), 3 (13.1%), and 17 (73.9%) patients were classified as POLE-mutated, p53 abnormal, mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability high, and no specific molecular profile, respectively. Molecular classification was not associated with 6-month response rates (p = .080) nor with best response rates (p = .366). Overall, 7 women attempted to achieve a pregnancy; 3 underwent in vitro fertilization. Three patients achieved a pregnancy (1 first-trimester miscarriage and 2 term live births). A total of 10 (43.4%) patients were diagnosed with progressive disease during hysteroscopic surveillance. Overall, 19 (82.6%) patients required hysterectomy. Three (13%) patients required adjuvant therapy for the presence of locally advanced disease (1 stage II, and 2 stage III). Over a median (range) follow-up of 28.7(8.2-91.1) months, no recurrence or disease-related death occurred. Less than 10% of women with grade II endometrioid endometrial cancer starting a fertility-sparing attempt achieve a term pregnancy. In our series, molecular classification did not influence response rate. Further collaborative registers are needed.

Evaluation of perioperative management of advanced ovarian (tubal/peritoneal) cancer patients: a survey from MITO-MaNGO Groups

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO)-quality indicators (QIs) for advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) have been assessed only by few Italian centers, and data are not available on the proportion of centers reaching the score considered for a satisfactory surgical management. There is great consensus that the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) approach is beneficial, but there is paucity of data concerning its application in AOC. This survey was aimed at gathering detailed information on perioperative management of AOC patients within MITO-MaNGO Groups. A 66-item questionnaire, covering ESGO-QIs for AOC and ERAS items, was sent to MITO/MaNGO centers reporting to operate >20 AOC/year. Thirty/34 questionnaires were analyzed. The median ESGO-QIs score was 31.5, with 50% of centers resulting with a score ≥32 which provides satisfactory surgical management. The rates of concordance with ERAS guidelines were 46.6%, 74.1%, and 60.7%, respectively, for pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative items. The proportion of overall agreement was 61.3%, and with strong recommendations was 63.1%. Pre-operative diet, fasting/bowel preparation, correction of anaemia, post-operative feeding and early mobilization were the most controversial. A significant positive correlation was found between ESGO-QIs score and adherence to ERAS recommendations. This survey reveals a satisfactory surgical management in only half of the centers, and an at least sufficient adherence to ERAS recommendations. Higher the ESGO-QIs score stronger the adherence to ERAS recommendations, underlining the correlations between case volume, appropriate peri-operative management and quality of surgery. The present study is a first step to build a structured platform for harmonization within MITO-MaNGO networks.

Fertility-sparing vs hysterectomy for uterine STUMP: A pragmatic clinical study.

Uterine smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) are rare neoplasms with unpredictable clinical behavior. Optimal management, particularly in reproductive-aged women, remains controversial, with limited data comparing the safety of fertility-sparing versus hysterectomy. This multicentre retrospective cohort study included women aged 18-85 with histologically confirmed STUMP treated at 17 Italian gynecologic oncology centers from 2010 to 2023. Patients underwent either fertility-sparing surgery (myomectomy or hysteroscopic resection) or definitive surgery (hysterectomy ± salpingo-oophorectomy). Kaplan-Meier and Cox models were used to compare recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Median (range) follow-up was 51 (1-291) months. Among 401 women, 106 (26.4 %) received fertility-sparing treatment (mean [± SD] age: 35.3 ± 6.8 years) and 295 (73.6 %) underwent definitive surgery (mean [± SD] age: 47.7 ± 9.2). At total follow-up, recurrence occurred in 12.5 % of patients, predominantly within the pelvis. Median RFS was longer after definitive surgery than after fertility-sparing procedures (50.0 vs 42.5 months; HR 2.39 [95 % CI 1.36-4.19]), although this difference disappeared when benign (leiomyoma) recurrences were excluded (HR 1.74 [95 % CI 0.90-3.34]). At last available follow-up, 97.5 % of patients were alive, with no significant OS difference between treatment groups (HR 0.22 [95 % CI 0.27-1.79]). Outcomes were comparable across menopausal status and concurrent adnexal removal. Definitive surgery reduces recurrence risk, but long-term survival is similarly excellent after fertility-sparing surgery in appropriately selected women with STUMP. Conservative management represents a reasonable option for patients desiring fertility, provided they receive counseling regarding recurrence risk, diagnostic uncertainty, and the need for long-term surveillance.

40Works
7Papers
65Collaborators
Links & IDs
0000-0002-3729-2321

Scopus: 56300132300