Feng Yang-chun

Genome‐Wide Profiling of Human Papillomavirus DNA Integration into Human Genome and Its Influence on PD‐L1 Expression in Chinese Uygur Cervical Cancer Women

Background . The Uygur is the fifth most populous ethnic group in China. Compared to other Chinese population, cervical cancer in them had high incidence, and HPV infection also was particular. Their HPV integration situation has never been reported. We aimed to investigate the integration situation of 20 subtypes of HPV gene into host cell genome in Chinese Uygur cervical cancer patients; meanwhile, we explored the influence of gene integration on PD‐L1 expression. Methods . 40 frozen Chinese Uygur cervical cancer specimens with positive HPV infection were obtained from the cancer prevention and treatment institute of Tumor Hospital Affiliated to Xinjiang Medical University. The integration situation of HPV gene into host cell genome was detected by Agilent SureSelect™ Target Enrichment Chip and Next‐Generation Sequencing. The related genes were analyzed by GO functional annotation and KEGG pathway enrichment. The expression levels of PD‐L1 in cancer cells were tested by immunohistochemical assay (IHC). Meanwhile, the relationship between PD‐L1 levels in cancer cells and gene integration were analyzed. Results . The HPV multiple infection rate by HIVID was as high as 92.5%, much higher than 35.0% by the commercial kit ( P < 0.05). There were 13423 integration events in 40 specimens, involving 6867 human genes. These integration events were distributed on all human chromosomes, and chromosome 19 had the excessive concentration phenomenon of integration events. There were some integration hotspots in human genome such as PPP1R37, HECW2, EMBP1, ANKRD50, SPTBN4, LINC00895, LYRM4‐AS1, LINC00374, RBFOX1, CSMD1, CDH13, and KLHL4. Insertion breakpoints can be found in all gene regions of the HPV genome. The actual observation of the integration times of E1 and E6 was much higher than the expected value, while the actual observation times of E5 were much lower than the expected value. The result of GO functional analysis showed that binding molecular function and cellular process biological process were the main ways to influence the cell biological behavior of HPV gene integration. The enrichment pathway analysis of KEGG showed that pathways in cancer were the most important enrichment pathways involved in the genomic integration of HPV. The positive PD‐L1 rate was 62.5%. Logistic regression analysis showed that 9p24.1 existing integration sites and the number of all gene integration were risk factors for PD‐L1 expression (odds ratio 17.313 and 1.012; 95% confidence interval 1.691‐177.213 and 1.001‐1.023). Conclusions and Relevance . Most high‐frequency sites of HPV integration in Chinese Uygur cervical cancer are related to cancer progression, and the gene integration hotspots may be potential HPV carcinogenic targets. The problem of multiple HPV infection in Chinese Uygur cervical cancer patients should be paid attention. L1 and E6 genes are inapposite as the target gene of commercial HPV type detection kit, because of high‐frequency breakpoints in these genes. The gene integration especially the integration existing on 9p24.1 could affect the expression level of PD‐L1.

Function and mechanism of GBP1 in the development and progression of cervical cancer

AbstractGuanylate binding protein 1 (GBP1) is the most concerned member of the GBP family, which has a series of effects such as anti-infection and anti-angiogenesis. Its role in malignant tumors including cervical cancer is still controversial. We aim to explore the effects of GBP1 on cervical cancer through bioinformatics and related experiments. In this study, we first found that GBP1 was generally expressed in cervical cancer in various online databases and was closely related to immune invasion. Secondly, we used multicolor immunofluorescence technology to verify the expression of GBP1 in cervical cancer tissues and its relationship with immune invasion, and explored its relationship with the prognosis of patients with cervical cancer. Knockdown and overexpression assays of GBP1 in vitro were used to prove GBP1 as a potential oncogene of cervical cancer, and its carcinogenicity was verified by in vivo experiment. In order to explore the potential mechanism of GBP1 in promoting cancer, RNA-seq was performed on GBP1 overexpression and knockdown expression cell lines, and GBP1 knockdown and overexpression were found to be associated with many RNA alternative splicing events, suggesting that GBP1 maybe a RNA binding protein (RBP) which affect the biological characteristics of cervical cancer cells through the alternative splicing pathway. However, the later RNA binding protein immunoprecipitation (RIP) assay proved that GBP1 was not a direct alternative splicing factor, while the co-immunoprecipitation (CoIP)-mass spectroscopy (MS) assay combined with protein protein interaction (PPI) analysis proved that 8 alternative splicing factors including Heterogeneous Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein K (HNRNPK) were interacting proteins of GBP1. Combined with the existing reports and the results of RNA-seq alternative splicing analysis, it is speculated that GBP1 may regulate the alternative splicing of CD44 protein by binding to interacting protein-HNRNPK, and thus play a role in promoting cancer in cervical cancer.