Investigator
University Hospital Heidelberg
GREB1 ‐rearranged uterine tumour shares a common DNA methylation signature with ESR1 ‐rearranged UTROSCT
Background and objectives GREB1 ‐rearranged uterine tumours encompass a group of uterine mesenchymal tumours with varied histologic appearances. The fusion partners to GREB1 include NCOA1‐3, SS18 and NR4A3 . Given that some GREB1 ‐rearranged uterine tumours exhibit histologic features of uterine tumours resembling ovarian sex cord tumour (UTROSCT), there is a general belief that GREB1 ‐rearranged uterine mesenchymal tumours are part of the UTROSCT family. Methods In this study, we applied global DNA methylation and copy number analyses to a series of 10 GREB1‐ rearranged uterine tumours and 21 classic UTROSCTs (7 of which were molecularly confirmed to harbour ESR1::NCOA2/3 fusions). Results We found that GREB1 ‐rearranged uterine tumors show an overlap in their global methylation profiles with UTROSCT, including ESR1::NCOA2/3 positive cases. Together, these tumours form a DNA methylation cluster separate from uterine smooth muscle tumours (leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas), endometrial stromal sarcomas (low‐grade and high‐grade), embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma and SMARCA4‐deficient uterine sarcomas. However, despite their epigenetic similarity, there were two notable differences. First, GREB1 ‐rearranged uterine tumours as a group displayed a greater degree of genomic complexity with more extensive copy number alterations than conventional UTROSCTs, including those harbouring ESR1::NCOA2/3 . Second, GREB1 ‐rearranged uterine tumours frequently lacked overt sex cord morphology: while all 7 ESR1::NCOA2/3 UTROSCTs demonstrated corded, nested, trabecular and/or tubular/sertoliform patterns, only 1 GREB1 ‐rearranged uterine tumour displayed a prominent trabecular pattern, with the remaining cases showing exclusively or predominantly diffuse/solid growth. Conclusions Overall, our findings confirm that GREB1 ‐rearranged uterine tumours are part of the UTROSCT spectrum, though they frequently exhibit a more diffuse growth pattern and a higher degree of genomic instability.
Prognostic values of molecular subtypes and SWI/SNF protein expression in de‐differentiated/undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma
AimsClassification and risk stratification of endometrial carcinoma (EC) has transitioned from histopathological features to molecular classification, e.g. the ProMisE classifier, identifying four prognostic subtypes: POLE mutant (POLEmut) with almost no recurrence or disease‐specific death events, mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) and no specific molecular profile (NSMP), with intermediate outcome and p53 abnormal (p53abn) with poor outcomes. However, the applicability of molecular classification is unclear in rare but aggressive histotypes of EC, e.g. de‐differentiated and undifferentiated endometrial cancers (DD/UDEC). Here, we aim to assembled a cohort of DD/UDEC from a single institution and analysed the prognostic significance of ProMisE molecular subtypes and the expression of SWItch/sucrose non‐fermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodelling complex members, previously implicated in the pathogenesis of DD/UDEC.Methods and resultsWe accrued 88 DD/UDEC cases, assessed POLE status by Sanger sequencing and performed immunohistochemistry for p53, mismatch repair and SWI/SNF proteins on the tissue microarrays assembled. Assignment of molecular subtypes was possible in 80 tumours; POLE sequencing failed in the remaining eight cases. There were 12 (15%) POLEmut, 44 (55%) MMRd, 14 (17.5%) p53abn and 10 (12.5%) NSMP DD/UDEC. POLEmut DD/UDECs had excellent outcomes, but the other three molecular subtypes all had poor outcomes, with no significant differences among them. The loss of one or more SWI/SNF proteins [AT‐rich interactive domain‐containing protein 1A (ARID1A), ARID1B, SWI/SNF‐related, matrix‐associated, actin‐dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily A, member 4 (SMARCA4), SMARCA2], observed in 66% (55 of 83) cases, was not of prognostic significance.ConclusionsThese results indicate that all molecular subtypes of DD/UDEC except POLEmut behave in an aggressive fashion. Further study is needed to determine whether these molecular alterations can be targeted with adjuvant therapy, in order to improve outcomes of patients with DD/UDEC.
Mesonephric‐type adenocarcinomas of the ovary: prevalence, diagnostic reproducibility, outcome, and value of PAX2
AbstractMesonephric‐type (or ‐like) adenocarcinomas (MAs) of the ovary are an uncommon and aggressive histotype. They appear to arise through transdifferentiation from Müllerian lesions creating diagnostic challenges. Thus, we aimed to develop a histologic and immunohistochemical (IHC) approach to optimize the identification of MA over its histologic mimics, such as ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (EC). First, we screened 1,537 ovarian epithelial neoplasms with a four‐marker IHC panel of GATA3, TTF1, ER, and PR followed by a morphological review of EC to identify MA in retrospective cohorts. Interobserver reproducibility for the distinction of MA versus EC was assessed in 66 cases initially without and subsequently with IHC information (four‐marker panel). Expression of PAX2, CD10, and calretinin was evaluated separately, and survival analyses were performed. We identified 23 MAs from which 22 were among 385 cases initially reported as EC (5.7%) and 1 as clear cell carcinoma. The interobserver reproducibility increased from fair to substantial (κ = 0.376–0.727) with the integration of the four‐marker IHC panel. PAX2 was the single most sensitive and specific marker to distinguish MA from EC and could be used as a first‐line marker together with ER/PR and GATA3/TTF1. Patients with MA had significantly increased risk of earlier death from disease (hazard ratio = 3.08; 95% CI, 1.62–5.85; p < 0.0001) compared with patients with EC, when adjusted for age, stage, and p53 status. A diagnosis of MA has prognostic implications for stage I disease, and due to the subtlety of morphological features in some tumors, a low threshold for ancillary testing is recommended.
Lessons from genomic profiling: towards a molecular‐based classification of ovarian Sertoli–Leydig cell tumour
Currently available molecular data support a dichotomous classification of Sertoli-Leydig cell tumours (SLCTs) based on DICER1 mutational status. This correspondence suggests a possible roadmap towards a molecular-based classification of SLCT.
Mesonephric‐like adenocarcinoma harbours characteristic copy number variations and a distinct DNA methylation signature closely related to mesonephric adenocarcinoma of the cervix
Abstract Mesonephric‐like adenocarcinoma (MLA) of the female genital tract is an uncommon histotype that can arise in both the endometrium and the ovary. The exact cell of origin and histogenesis currently remain unknown. Here, we investigated whole genome DNA methylation patterns and copy number variations (CNVs) in a series of MLAs in the context of a large cohort of various gynaecological carcinoma types. CNV analysis of 19 MLAs uncovered gains of chromosomes 1q (18/19, 95%), 10 (15/19, 79%), 12 (14/19, 74%), and 2 (10/19, 53%), as well as loss of chromosome 1p (7/19, 37%). Gains of chromosomes 1q, 10, and 12 were also identified in the majority of mesonephric adenocarcinomas of the uterine cervix (MAs) as well as subsets of endometrioid carcinomas (ECs) and low‐grade serous carcinomas of the ovary (LGSCs) but only in a minority of serous carcinomas of the uterine corpus (USCs), clear cell carcinomas (CCCs), and tubo‐ovarian high‐grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs). While losses of chromosome 1p together with gains of chromosome 1q were also identified in both MA and LGSC, gains of chromosome 2 were almost exclusively identified in MLA and MA. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering and t‐SNE analysis of DNA methylation data (Illumina EPIC array) identified a co‐clustering for MLAs and MAs, which was distinct from clusters of ECs, USCs, CCCs, LGSCs, and HGSCs. Group‐wise comparisons confirmed a close epigenetic relationship between MLA and MA. These findings, in conjunction with the established histological and immunophenotypical overlap, suggest bona fide mesonephric differentiation, and support a more precise terminology of mesonephric‐type adenocarcinoma instead of MLA in these tumours. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
High-Grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcomas With YWHAE::NUTM2 Gene Fusion Exhibit Recurrent CDKN2A Alterations and Absence of p16 Staining is a Poor Prognostic Marker
High-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas (HGESSs) are aggressive uterine tumors harboring oncogenic fusion proteins. We performed a molecular study of 36 HGESSs with YWHAE::NUTM2 gene fusion, assessing co-occurring genetic events, and showed that these tumors frequently harbor recurrent events involving the CDKN2A locus on chromosome 9p. Using array-based copy number profiling and CDKN2A fluorescence in situ hybridization, we identified homozygous and hemizygous deletions of CDKN2A in 18% and 14% of tumors (n = 22 analyzed), respectively. While all YWHAE-rearranged HGESSs with retained disomy for CDKN2A were immunohistochemically positive for p16INK4 (p16), all tumors with homozygous deletion of CDKN2A showed complete absence of p16 staining. Of the 2 tumors with a hemizygous deletion of CDKN2A, 1 showed diffuse and strong p16 positivity, whereas the other showed complete absence of staining. In the p16-negative case, we did not find intragenic mutations or DNA promoter methylation to explain the p16 protein loss, implicating other mechanisms in the regulation of protein expression. In our cohort, subclonal or complete absence of p16 staining was associated with worse overall survival compared with positive p16 staining (1-year overall survival: 28.6% vs 90.7%, respectively; n = 32; P < .001), with all 7 patients in the p16-negative group having succumbed to their disease within 2 years of diagnosis. Our results suggested CDKN2A alterations as a cooperative driver of tumorigenesis in a subset of HGESSs with the YWHAE::NUTM2 gene fusion and showed p16 to be a potential prognostic marker.
Cellular context determines DNA methylation profiles in SWI/SNF‐deficient cancers of the gynecologic tract
AbstractSWI/SNF (SWItch/Sucrose Non‐Fermentable) complex deficiency has been reported in a wide variety of cancers and is often associated with an undifferentiated phenotype. In the gynecologic tract SWI/SNF‐deficient cancers are diagnostically challenging and little is known about their cellular origins. Here we show that undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma (UDEC), SMARCA4‐deficient uterine sarcoma (SDUS), and ovarian small cell carcinoma, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) harbor distinct DNA methylation signatures despite shared morphology and SWI/SNF inactivation. Our results indicate that the cellular context is an important determinant of the epigenetic landscape, even in the setting of core SWI/SNF deficiency, and therefore methylation profiling may represent a useful diagnostic tool in undifferentiated, SWI/SNF‐deficient cancers. Furthermore, applying copy number analyses and group‐wise differential methylation analyses including endometrioid endometrial carcinomas and extracranial malignant rhabdoid tumors, we uncover analogous molecular features in SDUS and SCCOHT in contrast to UDEC. These results suggest that SDUS and SCCOHT represent chromosomally stable SWI/SNF‐deficient cancers of the gynecologic tract, which are within the broader spectrum of malignant rhabdoid tumors. © 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Endometrial stromal sarcomas with BCOR‐rearrangement harbor MDM2 amplifications
AbstractRecently a novel subtype of endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) defined by recurrent genomic alterations involving BCOR has been described (HGESS‐BCOR). We identified a case of HGESS‐BCOR with a ZC3H7B‐BCOR gene fusion, which harbored an amplification of the MDM2 locus. This index case prompted us to investigate MDM2 amplification in four additional cases of HGESS‐BCOR. Tumors were analyzed for MDM2 amplification by array‐based profiling of copy number alterations (CNAs) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), as well as for MDM2 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Additionally, a cohort of other mesenchymal uterine neoplasms, including 17 low‐grade ESS, 6 classical high‐grade ESS with YWHAE‐rearrangement, 16 uterine tumors resembling ovarian sex cord tumors, 7 uterine leiomyomas and 8 uterine leiomyosarcomas, was analyzed for CNAs in MDM2. Copy number profiling identified amplification of the 12q15 region involving the MDM2 locus in all five HGESS‐BCOR. Subsequent validation analyses of three tumors confirmed MDM2 amplification using MDM2 FISH. Accordingly, IHC showed MDM2 overexpression in all analyzed cases. None of the other uterine neoplasms in our series, including tumors that are in the histopathological differential diagnoses of HGESS‐BCOR, showed copy number gains of MDM2. Together, our results indicate that HGESS‐BCOR carries MDM2 amplifications, which has diagnostic implications and could potentially be used for targeted therapies in these clinically aggressive tumors.
Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: diagnostic challenges and emerging molecular insights †
Abstract Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (SCNECC) is a rare and highly aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis that predominantly affects premenopausal women. Histopathological evaluation is central to diagnosis and clinical management; however, distinguishing SCNECC from other ‘small blue round cell’ malignancies often requires a multimodal approach that integrates morphology, immunohistochemistry, and advanced molecular testing. In the absence of specific and sensitive biomarkers, SCNECC largely remains a diagnosis of exclusion, underscoring the need for comprehensive diagnostic algorithms. A study by Pan, Yan, Yuan et al employed whole transcriptome profiling and identified three molecular subgroups within SCNECC. Importantly, one subgroup displayed an inflamed phenotype, characterized by high expression of MHC‐II complex and IFN‐α/β–related genes, suggesting potential susceptibility to immunotherapy, a finding that mirrors observations in small cell lung cancer. These findings highlight the biological heterogeneity of SCNECC and reinforce the importance of integrating molecular data to refine diagnostic accuracy and guide therapeutic decision‐making. This commentary emphasizes the pressing need for comprehensive diagnostics and further research to advance treatment strategies for this rare and challenging malignancy. © 2025 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Uterine mesenchymal tumours harboring the KAT6B/A::KANSL1 gene fusion represent a distinct type of uterine sarcoma based on DNA methylation profiles
AbstractUterine mesenchymal tumours harboring KAT6B/A::KANSL1 gene fusions typically exhibit histological and immunophenotypic overlap with endometrial stromal and smooth muscle tumours. To date it remains uncertain whether such neoplasms should be regarded as variants of smooth muscle or endometrial stromal neoplasm, or if they constitute a distinct tumour type. In this study we investigated DNA methylation patterns and copy number variations (CNVs) in a series of uterine tumours harboring KAT6B/A::KANSL1 gene fusions in comparison to other mesenchymal neoplasms of the gynecological tract. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering and t-SNE analysis of DNA methylation data (Illumina EPIC array) identified a distinct cluster for 8/13 KAT6B/A::KANSL1 tumours (herein referred to as core cluster). The other 5 tumours (herein referred to as outliers) did not assign to the core cluster but clustered near various other tumour types. CNV analysis did not identify significant alterations in the core cluster. In contrast, various alterations, including deletions at the CDKN2A/B and NF1 loci were identified in the outlier group. Analysis of the DNA methylation clusters in relation to histological features revealed that while tumours in the core KAT6B/A::KANSL1 cluster were histologically bland, outlier tumours frequently exhibited “high-grade” histologic features in the form of significant nuclear atypia, increased mitotic activity and necrosis. Three of the five patients with outlier tumours died from their disease while clinical follow-up in the remaining two patients was limited (less than 12 months). In comparison, none of the 7 out of 8 patients with tumors in the core KAT6B/A::KANSL1 sarcoma cluster, where follow-up was available, died from disease. Furthermore, only 1 out of 7 patients recurred (mean follow-up of 30 months). In conclusion, KAT6B/A::KANSL1 uterine sarcoma is a molecularly unique type of uterine tumour that should be recognized as a distinct entity. These tumors typically exhibit low-grade histologic features but are occasionally morphologically high-grade; the latter have a DNA methylation profile different from the typical low-grade neoplasms and may be associated with aggressive behaviour.
Primary mucinous ovarian neoplasms rarely show germ cell histogenesis
Teratoma‐associated and so‐called pure Wilms tumour of the ovary represent two separate tumour types with distinct molecular features
AimsOvarian Wilms tumour (WT)/nephroblastoma is an extremely rare neoplasm that has been reported to occur in pure form or as a component of a teratomatous neoplasm. We hypothesized that teratoma‐associated and pure ovarian WT may represent different tumour types with diverging molecular backgrounds. To test this hypothesis, we comprehensively characterized a series of five tumours originally diagnosed as ovarian WT.Methods and ResultsThe five cases comprised three teratoma‐associated (two mature and one immature) and two pure WTs. Two of the teratoma‐associated WTs consisted of small nodular arrangements of “glandular”/epithelial structures, while the third consisted of both an epithelial and a diffuse spindle cell/blastemal component. The pure WTs consisted of “glandular” structures, which were positive for sex cord markers (including inhibin and SF1) together with a rhabdomyosarcomatous component. The two pure WTs harboured DICER1 pathogenic variants (PVs), while the three associated with teratomas were DICER1 wildtype. Panel‐based DNA sequencing of four of the cases did not identify PVs in the other genes investigated. Analysis of the HA19/IGF2 imprinting region showed retention of imprinting in the pure WTs but loss of heterozygosity with hypomethylation of the ICR1 region in two of three teratoma‐associated WTs. Furthermore, copy number variation and clustering‐based whole‐genome DNA methylation analyses identified divergent molecular profiles for pure and teratoma‐associated WTs.ConclusionBased on the morphological features, immunophenotype, and molecular findings (DICER1 PVs, copy number, and DNA methylation profiles), we suggest that the two cases diagnosed as pure primary ovarian WT represent moderately to poorly differentiated Sertoli Leydig cell tumours (SLCTs), while the tumours arising in teratomas represent true WTs. It is possible that at least some prior cases reported as pure primary ovarian WT represent SLCTs.
