Investigator
Akdeniz University
Wound Complications in Patients with Overweight, Obesity, and Gynecologic Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of Staple Versus Suture Closure
Background: Wound complications in gynecologic oncology, especially among patients with overweight and obesity, can significantly impact post-operative recovery and delay the initiation of adjuvant treatment. Although staples are commonly used for vertical incisions, sutures may offer clinical advantages; however, direct comparative data remain limited. This study aimed to compare post-operative wound complication rates between staples and non-absorbable sutures in patients with gynecologic cancer with a body mass index ≥25 kg/m 2 and undergoing a vertical incision surgical procedure. Patients and Methods: A retrospective review was conducted at a gynecologic oncology center between January 2022 and September 2023. Patients who underwent midline laparotomy with either staples or 3-0 non-absorbable monofilament sutures for skin closure were included. Patients with prior chemotherapy, benign pathology, or age <18 were excluded. Wound complications—including seroma, hematoma, dehiscence (superficial and fascial), and infection—were recorded within eight weeks postoperatively. Results: Of 72 patients, 29 received staples and 43 received sutures. Wound complications occurred in 41% of the staple group and 21% of the suture group (p = 0.061). Fascial dehiscence was observed in four cases (two in each group). Although rates of dehiscence and infection were higher with staples, differences were not statistically significant. Hospital stay was significantly longer in the staple group (p = 0.045). Conclusion: Although not statistically significant, suture closure was associated with fewer wound complications and a shorter hospital stay, suggesting potential advantages in wound healing. These findings may inform future recommendations, and further prospective studies are warranted.
Factors Associated with Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastasis in High-Risk Endometrial Cancer
Background and Objectives: Para-aortic lymph node involvement is a key prognostic factor in high-risk endometrial cancer. This study aimed to identify factors associated with para-aortic lymph node metastasis and to assess their predictive value for surgical decision-making. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 81 patients with high-risk endometrial cancer who underwent systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy between January 2015 and December 2024. Factors evaluated included histologic subtype, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), cervical stromal involvement, depth of myometrial invasion, and tumor diameter. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of para-aortic metastasis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the optimal tumor size threshold. Results: Para-aortic lymph node metastasis was identified in 21.0% of patients, and isolated para-aortic metastasis was observed in 2.5%. In univariate analysis, pelvic lymph node positivity, LVSI, cervical stromal invasion, deep myometrial invasion, and tumor size ≥ 3.55 cm were significantly associated with para-aortic spread. Multivariate analysis revealed that pelvic lymph node positivity was the only independent predictor (OR 39.0; 95% CI 5.06–301.46; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Pelvic lymph node status serves as a strong and independent predictor of para-aortic metastasis in high-risk endometrial cancer. A tumor diameter greater than 3.5 cm may also indicate an increased risk of para-aortic spread. These findings suggest that selective and individualized para-aortic assessment strategies may be considered to improve staging accuracy and optimize surgical planning in this patient population.
