Fabio Martinelli

Development of a surgical competency assessment tool for sentinel lymph node dissection by minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer

Sentinel lymph node dissection is widely used in the staging of endometrial cancer. Variation in surgical techniques potentially impacts diagnostic accuracy and oncologic outcomes, and poses barriers to the comparison of outcomes across institutions or clinical trial sites. Standardization of surgical technique and surgical quality assessment tools are critical to the conduct of clinical trials. By identifying mandatory and prohibited steps of sentinel lymph node (SLN) dissection in endometrial cancer, the purpose of this study was to develop and validate a competency assessment tool for use in surgical quality assurance. A Delphi methodology was applied, included 35 expert gynecological oncology surgeons from 16 countries. Interviews identified key steps and tasks which were rated mandatory, optional, or prohibited using questionnaires. Using the surgical steps for which consensus was achieved, a competency assessment tool was developed and subjected to assessments of validity and reliability. Seventy percent consensus agreement standardized the specific mandatory, optional, and prohibited steps of SLN dissection for endometrial cancer and informed the development of a competency assessment tool. Consensus agreement identified 21 mandatory and three prohibited steps to complete a SLN dissection. The competency assessment tool was used to rate surgical quality in three preselected videos, demonstrating clear separation in the rating of the skill level displayed with mean skills summary scores differing significantly between the three videos (F score=89.4; P<0.001). Internal consistency of the items was high (Cronbach α=0.88). Specific mandatory and prohibited steps of SLN dissection in endometrial cancer have been identified and validated based on consensus among a large number of international experts. A competency assessment tool is now available and can be used for surgeon selection in clinical trials and for ongoing, prospective quality assurance in routine clinical care.

Endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer: a different clinical entity

To compare survival outcomes and patterns of recurrence between endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer patients and non-endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer patients. This retrospective study included data of consecutive patients with endometrioid or clear cell ovarian cancer treated at the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano between January 2010 and June 2021. Patients were assigned to one of two groups according to the absence or presence of endometriosis together with ovarian cancer at final histological examination. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox hazard models. Proportions in recurrence rate and pattern of recurrence were evaluated using the Fisher exact test. Overall, 83 women were included in the endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer group and 144 in the non-endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer group, respectively. Patients included in the non- endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer group had a shorter disease-free survival than those in the endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer group (23.4 (range 2.0-168.9) vs 60.9 (range 4.0-287.8) months; p<0.001). Univariable and multivariable analyses showed that the association with endometriosis, previous hormonal treatment, early stage at presentation, and endometrioid histology were related to better disease-free survival in the entire study population. Similarly, patients in the non-endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer group had a shorter median (range) overall survival than those in the endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer group (54.4 (range 0.7-190.6) vs 77.6 (range 4.5-317.8) months; p<0.001). Univariable and multivariable analyses showed that younger age at diagnosis, association with endometriosis, and early stage at presentation were related to better overall survival. The recurrence rate was higher in the non-endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer group (63/144 women, 43.8%) than in the endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer group (17/83 women, 20.5%; p<0.001). Endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer patients had significantly longer disease-free survival and overall survival than non-endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer patients, while the recurrence rate was higher in non-endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer patients.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer: When, how and in which patients

The role of nodal dissection in patients with endometrial cancer has been intensively studied in several studies. Historically, systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy represented the gold standard surgical treatment to assess potential nodal involvement and consequently define the appropriate stage of the tumor. Over the last years, sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) has been introduced as a more targeted alternative to lymph node dissection for lymph node staging and it has become popular among gynecologic oncologists. However, no level A evidence is still available, and several features of the SLNB technique have been matter of discussion among clinicians and a universally accepted methodology is still not currently available. This narrative review aims to summarize the body of knowledge on SLNB to offer the reader a complete picture about the evolution of this technique over the last decades.

Low pressure laparoscopic procedure in morbidly obese patients with endometrial carcinoma using a new subcutaneous abdominal wall-retraction device: a surgical challenge

Sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer: performance of hysteroscopic injection of tracers

To report on the performance of hysteroscopic injection of tracers (indocyanine green (ICG) and technetium-99m (Tc-99m)) for sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in endometrial cancer. Single-center retrospective evaluation of consecutive patients who underwent SLN mapping following hysteroscopic peritumoral injection of tracer. Detection rate (overall/bilateral/aortic) diagnostic accuracy, and oncologic outcomes were evaluated. A total of 221 procedures met the inclusion criteria. Mean patient age was 60 (range 28-84) years and mean body mass index was 26.9 (range 15-47) kg/m Hysteroscopic injection of tracers for SLN mapping in endometrial cancer is as accurate as cervical injection with a higher detection rate in the aortic area. ICG improves the bilateral detection rate. Adding lymphadenectomy to SLN mapping does not reduce the risk of relapse.

Fertility-sparing treatment with conization versus radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: inverse propensity score weighted analysis

To report 20 years of experience with fertility-sparing surgery for patients with early-stage cervical cancer, comparing the oncological outcomes with outcomes for those who underwent a radical hysterectomy. Patients with pre-operative stage IA1 with lymphovascular space invasion, IA2 and IB1 cervical cancer (any grade) were included (2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system). Inclusion criteria comprised age (18-44 years), histology (squamous, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous) and absence of previous/concomitant cancer. A thorough counseling about oncological and obstetrical potential risks was mandatory for patients asking for fertility sparing. Results for consecutive patients who underwent fertility-sparing surgery (cervical conization and nodal evaluation) were analyzed and compared with results for patients treated with radical surgery. Oncological outcomes were assessed with a propensity score adjustment with inverse probability of treatment weighting. Overall, 109 patients were included in the study. Ten patients abandoned the fertility-sparing route because of nodal involvement (n=5), margin positive (n=2), or because patients requested radical treatment (n=3). Sentinel node mapping was performed in 19 of 49 (38.8%) patients in the fertility-sparing surgery group. Among the patients in the fertility-sparing group, 6 (12.2%) patients relapsed. 34 (69.4%) patients attempted to conceive. Pre-operative covariates selected to define the probability of having either fertility-sparing or radical surgery were well balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Pathological features were similar between the groups, including grading, histotype, stage, and lymphovascular space invasion. After a median follow-up of 38.8 (range 5-186) months there were no differences in progression-free survival (p=0.32) and overall survival (p=0.74) between the fertility-sparing and radical hysterectomy groups. The results after inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment did not show significant differences in progression-free survival (p=0.72) and overall survival (p=0.71) between the groups. Fertility-sparing surgery based on conization plus laparoscopic lymph node evaluation, may be considered safe and effective for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.

Are biomarkers expression and clinical-pathological factors predictive markers of the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer?

To predict the overall pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) creating a prediction model based on clinical-pathological factors and biomarkers (p53, Bcl1 and Bcl2) and to evaluate the prognostic outcomes of NACT. This is a retrospective study of 88 consecutive patients with LACC who underwent NACT followed by nerve sparing surgery with retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy at National Cancer Institute of Milan, between January 2000 and June 2013. Clinical pathologic data were retrieved from the institutional database. Biomarkers (p53, Bcl1 and Bcl2) were evaluated before and after NACT in the specimen. To investigate their role as predictors of response, we tried several statistical machine learning algorithms. Responders to NACT showed a 5-years survival between 100%(CR) and 85.7%(PR). Clinical factors were the most important predictor of response. Age, BMI and grade represented the most important predictors of response at random forest analysis. Tree-based boosting revealed that after adjusting for other prognostic factors, age, grade, BMI and tumor size were independent predictors of response to NACT, while p53 was moderately related to response to NACT. Area under the curve (crude estimate): 0.871. Whereas Bcl1 and Bcl2, were not predictors for response to NACT. The final logistic regression reported that grade was the only significant predictor of response to NACT. Combined model that included clinical pathologic variables plus p53 cannot predict response to NACT. Despite this, NACT remain a safe treatment in chemosensitive patients avoiding collateral sequelae related to chemo-radiotherapy.

Validation of MiROvaR, a microRNA-based predictor of early relapse in early stage epithelial ovarian cancer as a new strategy to optimise patients' prognostic assessment

Early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (eEOC) patients have a generally favorable prognosis but unpredictable recurrence. Accurate prediction of risk of relapse is still a major concern, essentially to avoid overtreatment. Our robust tissue-based miRNA signature named MiROvaR, predicting early EOC recurrence in mostly advanced-stage EOC patients, is here challenged in an independent cohort to extend its classifying ability in the early-stage EOC setting. We retrospectively selected patients who underwent comprehensive surgical staging at our institution including stages from IA to IIB. miRNA expression profile was analysed in 89 cases and MiROvaR algorithm was applied using the previously validated cut-off for patients' classification. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 5 years. Complete follow-up time (median = 112 months) was also considered as secondary analysis. MiROvaR was assessable on 87 cases (19 events of disease progression) and classified 68 (78%) low-risk and 19 (22%) high-risk patients. Recurrence rate at primary end-point was 39% for high-risk patients as compared to 9.5% for low-risk ones. Accordingly, their Kaplan-Meier PFS curves were significantly different at both primary and secondary analysis (p = 0.0006 and p = 0.03, respectively). While none of the prominent clinical variables had prognostic relevance, MiROvaR significantly predicted disease recurrence at the 5-year assessment (primary endpoint analysis; HR:5.43, 95%CI:1.82-16.1, p = 0.0024; AUC = 0.78, 95%CI:0.53-0.82) and at complete follow-up time (HR:2.67, 95%CI:1.04-6.8, p = 0.041; AUC:0.68, 95%CI:0.52-0.82). We validated MiROvaR performance in identifying at diagnosis eEOC patients' at higher risk of early relapse thus enabling selection of the most effective therapeutic approach.

Cytoreductive surgery followed by chemotherapy and olaparib maintenance in BRCA 1/2 mutated recurrent ovarian cancer: a retrospective MITO group study

The role of cytoreductive surgery in the poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors era is not fully investigated. We evaluated the impact of surgery performed prior to platinum-based chemotherapy followed by olaparib maintenance in platinum-sensitive BRCA-mutated recurrent ovarian cancer. This retrospective study included platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer BRCA-mutated patients from 13 Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian cancer and gynecological malignancies centers treated between September 2015 and May 2019. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival and overall survival. Data on post-progression treatment was also assessed. Among 209 patients, 72 patients (34.5%) underwent cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy and olaparib maintenance, while 137 patients (65.5%) underwent chemotherapy treatment alone. After a median follow-up of 37.3 months (95% CI: 33.4 to 40.8), median progression-free survival in the surgery group was not reached, compared with 11 months in patients receiving chemotherapy alone (P12 months, between 6 and 12 months, and <6 months, respectively. Cytoreductive surgery performed before platinum therapy and olaparib maintenance was associated with longer progression-free survival and overall survival in BRCA-mutated platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer patients. In accordance with our preliminary results, the response rate to chemotherapy given after progression during olaparib was associated with platinum-free interval.

Response to treatment and prognostic significance of supradiaphragmatic disease in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer

This study was designed to investigate the response to chemotherapy of supradiaphragmatic disease diagnosed by preoperative imaging. As secondary objectives, oncologic outcomes of patients affected by supradiaphragmatic disease and their pattern of recurrence were also evaluated. Data of consecutive patients with newly diagnosed FIGO stage IV (for supradiaphragmatic disease) epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing either primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus interval debulking surgery between 2004 and 2021, were retrospectively collected. All patients were preoperatively evaluated by chest/abdominal CT scan or A total of 130 patients was included in this study with a median (range) follow-up of 32.9 (12.8-176.7) months. Complete or partial response was achieved in most of the patients after 3 cycles (77.7%) and 6 cycles (85.4%) of chemotherapy. At follow-up, recurrence occurred in 96 (73.8%) patients and the main site of recurrence was abdomen only in 64 (66.7%) patients. At multivariate analysis, residual disease after surgery was the only variable influencing survival outcomes. Supradiaphragmatic disease respond to chemotherapy in most patients affected by advanced EOC and recurrence mainly occurs in the abdomen. Results from this study confirms that abdominal optimal cytoreduction is the main surgical goal in the treatment of women affected by FIGO stage IV EOC.

Age-specific predictors of cervical dysplasia recurrence after primary conization: analysis of 3,212 women

This study aimed to identify predictors of recurrence/persistence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ (CIN2+) lesion (r-CIN2+) after primary conization. Retrospective analysis involving all consecutive women having conization for CIN2+ between 1998 and 2018. The risk of r-CIN2+ was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox models. Data of 3,212 women were retrospectively identified. After a mean follow-up of 47 (±22.2) months, 112 (3.5%) patients developed r-CIN2+. Mean time interval between prior conization and diagnosis of r-CIN2+ was 26.2 (±13.2) months. Via multivariate analysis, presence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) types at the time of CIN2+ diagnosis, hazard ratio (HR)=3.40 (95% confidence interval [CI]=1.66-6.95) for HPV16/18 and HR=2.59 (95% CI=1.21-5.55) for HPV types other than 16/18, positive margins at primary conization, HR=4.11 (95% CI=2.04-8.26) and HPV persistence after conization, HR=16.69 (95% CI=8.20-33.9), correlated with r-CIN2+, independently. Considering age-specific HPV types distribution, we observed that HPV16/18 infection correlated to an increased risk of r-CIN2+ only in young women (aged ≤25 years; p=0.031, log-rank test); while in the older population (>25 years) HPV type(s) involved had not impact on r-CIN2+ risk (p>0.200, log-rank test). HPV persistence is the main factor predicting r-CIN2+. Infection from HPV16/18 has a detrimental effect in young women, thus highlighting the need of implementing vaccination against HPV in this population. Further prospective studies are warranted for tailoring clinical decision-making for post-conization follow-up on the basis of risk factors.

Conization and lymph node evaluation as a fertility-sparing treatment for early stage cervical cancer

To evaluate oncological and obstetrical outcomes of early stage cervical cancer patients who underwent conservative management to retain childbearing potential. Data of women (aged <40 years) who underwent fertility sparing treatment for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IA1 with lymphovascular invasion (LVSI) and IB1 cervical cancer were prospectively collected. All patients underwent cervical conization/s and laparoscopic nodal evaluation (pelvic lymphadenectomy/sentinel node mapping). Oncological and obstetrical outcomes were assessed. Overall, 39 patients met inclusion criteria; 36 (92.3%) women were nulliparous. There were: 3 (7.7%) IA1-LVSI+; 11 (28.2%) IA2; and 25 (64.1%) IB1 cervical cancers, according to 2018 FIGO stage classification. Histological types were 22 (56.4%) squamous carcinoma and 17 (43.6%) adenocarcinoma. Pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in 29 (74.4%) patients, while 10 (25.6%) patients had only sentinel node mapping. In 4 (10.3%) patients conservative treatment was discontinued due to nodal involvement and 2 (5.1%) patients requested definitive treatment (hysterectomy) after a negative lymph node evaluation. Among 33 (84.6%) patients who retained their childbearing potential, 17 (51.5%) had a second conization. 2 (6.1%) patients relapsed and underwent definitive treatment. After a median follow-up of 51 months (range 1-184) no deaths were reported. 22 (70.9%) patients attempted to conceive. There were 13 natural pregnancies among 12 (54.5%) women who got pregnant. Live birth rate was 76.9%: 9 (69.2%) term and 1 (7.7%) preterm (at 32 weeks) deliveries. 2 (15.4%) miscarriages (first and second trimester) and 1 (7.7%) termination of pregnancy for medical reasons were recorded. Conization plus laparoscopic nodal evaluation may be a safe and feasible conservative option in the setting of fertility-sparing treatment for early-stage cervical cancer patients.

Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter analysis

Recent evidence has shown adverse oncological outcomes when minimally invasive surgery is used in early-stage cervical cancer. The objective of this study was to compare disease-free survival in patients that had undergone radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, either by laparoscopy or laparotomy. We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of patients with cervical cancer stage IA1 with lymph-vascular invasion, IA2, and IB1 (FIGO 2009 classification), between January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2017, at seven cancer centers from six countries. We included squamous, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous histologies. We used an inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity score to construct a weighted cohort of women, including predictor variables selected a priori with the possibility of confounding the relationship between the surgical approach and survival. We estimated the HR for all-cause mortality after radical hysterectomy with weighted Cox proportional hazard models. A total of 1379 patients were included in the final analysis, with 681 (49.4%) operated by laparoscopy and 698 (50.6%) by laparotomy. There were no differences regarding the surgical approach in the rates of positive vaginal margins, deep stromal invasion, and lymphovascular space invasion. Median follow-up was 52.1 months (range, 0.8-201.2) in the laparoscopic group and 52.6 months (range, 0.4-166.6) in the laparotomy group. Women who underwent laparoscopic radical hysterectomy had a lower rate of disease-free survival compared with the laparotomy group (4-year rate, 88.7% vs 93.0%; HR for recurrence or death from cervical cancer 1.64; 95% CI 1.09-2.46; P=0.02). In sensitivity analyzes, after adjustment for adjuvant treatment, radical hysterectomy by laparoscopy compared with laparotomy was associated with increased hazards of recurrence or death from cervical cancer (HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.13 to 2.57; P=0.01) and death for any cause (HR 2.14; 95% CI 1.05-4.37; P=0.03). In this retrospective multicenter study, laparoscopy was associated with worse disease-free survival, compared to laparotomy.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval surgery versus primary debulking surgery in FIGO stage III-IV epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

To compare survival and perioperative outcomes of Primary debulking surgery (PDS) versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) in newly diagnosed FIGO stage III-IV ovarian cancer. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, major conference proceedings (inception to July 13, 2025) STUDY SELECTION: Phase-III randomized trials comparing survival outcomes between PDS and NACT-IDS, enrolling adults with newly diagnosed stage III-IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. Following PRISMA, two reviewers independently screened, extracted and assessed risk-of-bias (RoB 1). Random-effects meta-analysis estimated pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for OS/PFS and risk ratios (RRs) for binary endpoints. Heterogeneity was quantified with the I² statistic. PROSPERO (CRD420251056445). Five RCTs (n = 2380 women), including one conference-only report, met criteria. NACT-IDS yielded no difference in OS (HR 1.00; 95 % CI 0.90-1.12; I² = 16 %) and PFS (HR 1.03; 95 % CI 0.92-1.16; I² = 39 %) versus PDS. Grade ≥ 3 perioperative complications were significantly less frequent with NACT-IDS (RR 0.43; 95 % CI 0.25-0.74; I² = 75 %) while CC-0 rates were higher (RR 2.02; 95 % CI 1.26-3.24; I² = 94 %). In FIGO stage III-IV, NACT-IDS achieves survival endpoints similar to PDS, while increasing the likelihood of complete macroscopic resection and reducing severe perioperative morbidity. Upfront surgery in advanced ovarian cancer management should likely be reserved for patients with feasible complete resection and presumed low morbidity.

Research on Laparoscopic Fertility-Sparing Surgery in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer

Purpose: To evaluate the oncological and obstetrical outcomes of women with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent laparoscopic-assisted vaginal radical trachelectomy (LAVRT). All women with early-stage cervical cancer who planned to undergo fertility-preserved radical trachelectomy. The obstetric outcome evaluation was restricted to women with ≥12 months of follow-up and an active desire to conceive. The oncological outcome was evaluated in all patients. Statistical methods: Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 26. The t-test is used for analyzing the continuous variables and the chi-squared test for categorical variables.