Investigator

Fabiana Resende Rodrigues

Professor de Anatomia Patológica · Universidade Federal Fluminense, Patologia

About

FRRFabiana Resende R…
Papers(3)
The occurrence of cer…Association of Swede …Human epidermal growt…
Collaborators(10)
Caroline Alves Olivei…Susana Cristina Aidé …Isabel Cristina Chulv…Nathália Silva Carlos…Priscila Loyola CamposThatiana Terzi Galvão…Vânia Gloria Silami L…Ana Carolina BritoAna Luisa Figueira Go…Antônio Braga
Institutions(3)
Universidade Federal …Universidade Federal …Universidade Federal …

Papers

Association of Swede Score and 2011 IFCPC Nomenclature in Women with Abnormal Cytology

Abstract Objective To assess the association between two colposcopic indices, the Swede score and the 2011 International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy (IFCPC) Nomenclature as well as to determine the efficacy of the Swede score with cutoffs of 7 and 8. Methods In the present cross-sectional pilot study, 34 women who had at least 1 colposcopy-directed biopsy due to abnormal cytology were enrolled. The colposcopic findings were scored by both the Swede score and the 2011 IFCPC Nomenclature and were compared with each other. The Kappa coefficient and the McNemar test were used. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (NPV and PPV, respectively) were calculated, as well as the effectiveness with cutoffs of 7 and 8 in identifying cervical intraepithelial neoplasm (CIN) 2+ when using the Swede score. Results The correlation between the 2 colposcopic indices was 79.41%. The Kappa coefficient and the McNemar p-value were 0.55 and 0.37, respectively. The IFCPC Nomenclature had sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of 85.71, 55.00, 67.64, 57.14, and 84.61%, respectively. The Swede score had sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of 100, 63.15, 79.41, 68.18, and 100%, respectively. A Swede score cutoff of 7 for CIN 2+ detection had a specificity of 94.73%, while with a cutoff of 8 it increased to 100%. The sensitivity for both values was 60%. The PPV and NPV for cutoffs of 7 and 8 were 90 and 75 and 100 and 76%, respectively. Conclusion Although both colposcopic indices have good reproducibility, the Swede score showed greater accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in identifying CIN 2 + , especially when using a cutoff of 8.

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and proliferation Ki-67 biomarkers using a tissue microarray to refine the histopathological subtyping of hydatidiform moles: Limitations and prognostic value

The morphology-based differential diagnosis of Hydatidiform Mole (HM) of the Complete (CHM) and Partial (PHM) types is challenging because of earlier diagnosis of HM owing to the universal application of ultrasound during antenatal care. HMs may present with amplified oncogenes or other gene mutations, resulting in recurrent or neoplastic disease. The cell proliferation markers Ki-67 and HER2 may contribute to the final HM subtype and prognosis. Much is known about the basic mechanisms of HM development; however, other molecular diagnostic and predictive markers need to be investigated. This was an ambispective anatomopathological study of 108 HMs cases. A tissue microarray was used for Ki-67 or HER2 immunostaining analysis. Associations between immunomarker scores and postmolar Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia (GTN) were analyzed via Fisher's exact and linear-by-linear association tests. A statistically significant trend toward increased Ki-67 immunostaining in CHM samples was observed. Seventeen HM patients developed GTN, of whom 6 (35 %) had a Ki-67 score of 3+ and 9 (53 %) had Ki-67 score of 2+. Two (12 %) HM patients had a HER2 score of 3+, and 4 (23 %) HM patients had a HER2 score of 2+, of whom 2 (12 %) patients exhibited oncogene amplification by FISH HER2. Ki-67 and HER2 markers may be useful for the diagnosis and prediction of HM development, providing alternative targeted therapies. This study needs to be interpreted with caution due to its small sample size, high sample exclusion rate, and the absence of significant associations between biomarkers and clinical outcomes.

15Works
3Papers
14Collaborators
Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsPrognosisNeoplasm GradingColorectal NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsTumor Suppressor Protein p53Uterine Neoplasms

Positions

Professor de Anatomia Patológica

Universidade Federal Fluminense · Patologia

Médica

Instituto Nacional de Câncer · Patologia