Evelyn Reynolds

Rewinding the clock on positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer: does it predict prognosis in low-risk disease?

Positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer is a known risk factor for worse oncologic outcomes but is not used for staging purposes or to guide adjuvant treatment. Additionally, its prognostic impact on low-risk patients remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the role of positive peritoneal cytology in patients with endometrial cancer and focused on low-risk disease. This is a retrospective cohort study including all consecutive patients undergoing primary surgery for endometrial cancer at Mayo Clinic from 1999 to 2021. The role of positive peritoneal cytology was investigated in the entire cohort and in 2 subgroups: the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) low-risk group, including low-risk patients according to NCCN guidelines (endometrioid, grade 1-2, stage IA) and the European Society of Gynecologic Oncology/European Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology (ESGO/ESTRO/ESP) low-risk group, including low-risk patients according to ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines (as NCCN, plus no lymphovascular space invasion). Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to evaluate the association of positive peritoneal cytology with recurrence within 5 years after surgery, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed in all groups. A total of 3517 patients were included, 1911 in the NCCN low-risk group and 1832 in the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP low-risk group. Positive peritoneal cytology was found in 15.9% of the entire cohort (559/3517), 8.1% of the NCCN low-risk group (154/1911), and 7.9% of the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP low-risk group (145/1832). In both low-risk groups, 5-year recurrence-free survival was worse in patients with positive peritoneal cytology (p < .01 and p = .03, respectively), but there was no difference in overall survival. On univariate analysis, age, tumor grade, and positive peritoneal cytology were significant predictors of recurrence in both subgroups. After multivariable analysis, positive peritoneal cytology remained independently associated with recurrence (p < .01 and p = .03, respectively). Positive peritoneal cytology was an independent predictor of recurrence and was associated with worse recurrence-free survival in patients with low-risk endometrial cancer. However, overall survival was not impacted.

Circulating tumor DNA in endometrial cancer: clinical significance and implications

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising non-invasive tool that has been demonstrated to be a clinically useful biomarker in several tumor types for risk stratification, prognosis, and early detection of recurrence. However, there are limited data on the clinical utility of ctDNA in endometrial cancer (EC) compared with other solid tumors. The evolution of EC management through the integration of molecular characterization into the treatment algorithm has intensified the need to develop more effective predictive biomarkers to optimize treatment and reduce clinical toxicities. Given its non-invasive nature and its ability to represent and complement tumor multiclonal spatial and temporal heterogeneity, ctDNA could act as a valid surrogate for tissue sampling. In addition to plasma ctDNA detection being associated with clinicopathologic features of tumor aggressiveness at pre-operative assessment, an association with reduced disease-free survival and overall survival has been observed in patients with detectable ctDNA. Moreover, the half-life of ctDNA is significantly shorter than CA125, and plasma levels are reported to be completely cleared from the blood within 1 week from surgical debulking. Therefore, ctDNA may serve as a dynamic biomarker for occult microscopic residual disease when assessed within the first 4 to 8 weeks after eradicative surgery. Few studies have reported high sensitivity of ctDNA in detecting disease recurrence at longitudinal follow-up, although there are limited data comparing ctDNA and traditional serum biomarkers (CA125 and HE4) in identifying recurrence. In the perspective of personalized oncology, ctDNA may potentially help improve adjuvant therapeutic management by escalating/de-escalating treatment based on ctDNA detection after surgery, during maintenance, or in the recurrent/metastatic setting, in addition to acting as a sensitive biomarker for early detection of recurrence. Several challenges hinder the use of ctDNA in EC, including the lack of standardized protocols, the low mutational burden, tumor heterogeneity, and background normal DNA, which limit assay sensitivity and specificity. In addition, the high cost of ctDNA analysis, particularly, next-generation sequencing, restricts its accessibility. Future trials should focus on cost-effective approaches to ensure sustainability and efficient resource allocation.

Multi-center, international endometrial cancer consortium highlights

The multi-center, international consortium on endometrial cancer held in January 2025 at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota brought together leading experts in gynecologic oncology to explore the latest advancements in the understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of endometrial cancer. Discussions centered on key topics, including updates in molecular testing and disease staging, emerging treatment strategies for advanced and recurrent disease, fertility-sparing management, and critical pathology challenges, particularly, the assessment of lympho-vascular space invasion. Each topic was examined in dedicated working group sessions, fostering in-depth exchanges to identify research priorities and develop actionable strategies. This summary highlights the central themes and insights from the meeting, outlining a roadmap for future advancements in the field. By promoting inter-disciplinary collaboration, the meeting laid the foundation for future research, policy recommendations, and clinical innovations aimed at improving patient outcomes.

Prognostic value of perioperative circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in endometrial cancer with high-risk features: a prospective observational study.

Although circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising prognostic tool in various malignancies, evidence in endometrial cancer at high risk of recurrence is limited. This study evaluated the association of pre- and post-surgical ctDNA with advanced-stage disease, disease-free and overall survival in endometrial cancer with high-risk features. This prospective observational study was conducted at Mayo Clinic (7/2016-6/2021). Patients with endometrial cancer at preoperative biopsy, confirmed by final pathology, were included. Blood samples were collected before and 10 weeks after surgery. Tumor-specific junctions identified in pathology specimens and blood samples were used to detect ctDNA. Associations between pre- and post-surgical ctDNA and advanced-stage disease, recurrence, and death were evaluated using logistic regression [odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence interval] and Cox proportional hazards [hazard ratio (HR) and 95 % confidence interval]. Thirty-six patients were included: 6 (16.7 %) intermediate risk, 1 (2.8 %) high-intermediate risk, 28 (77.8 %) high risk, and 1 (2.8 %) advanced metastatic. Detection of pre- or post-surgical ctDNA was not significantly associated with advanced disease (pre-surgical OR 5.69 [0.88-66.02]; post-surgical OR 5.86 [0.83-72.68]). Pre-surgical ctDNA did not significantly predict recurrence (HR 0.99 [0.30-3.23]) or death (HR 3.23 [0.40-25.91]). In contrast, post-surgical ctDNA was associated with increased risk of recurrence (HR 3.32 [1.05-10.51]) and death (HR 5.97 [1.11-36.08]). Post-surgical ctDNA detection was associated with poor outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer. These findings support the potential of ctDNA as a biomarker to personalize surveillance and guide post-surgical treatment strategies.