Investigator

Eva Obermayr

PostDoc · Medical University of Vienna, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

EOEva Obermayr
Papers(3)
GANNET53 Part II: A E…Association of the Si…Gene expression marke…
Collaborators(10)
Isabelle Ray-CoquardRobert ZeillingerHanno UlmerIgnace VergoteIoana I. BraicuJalid SehouliMatthias DobbelsteinNicole ConcinNicole HeinzlPhilipp Harter
Institutions(8)
Medical University Of…Centre Leon BErardInnsbruck Medical Uni…European UnionCharité - Universität…Georg-August-Universi…Medical University of…Kliniken Essen Mitte

Papers

GANNET53 Part II: A European Phase I/II Trial of the HSP90 Inhibitor Ganetespib in High-Grade Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer—A Study of the GANNET53 Consortium

Abstract Purpose: Mutant p53 stabilized by heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) is a novel target in oncology. The open-label, randomized phase II GANNET53 trial is the first to evaluate the HSP90 inhibitor ganetespib (G) with paclitaxel (P) in platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EUDRACT 2013-003868-31; EU FP7 #602602). Patients and Methods: Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive G + P or P alone until progression. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and PFS rate at 6 months. Exploratory endpoints were biomarkers based on p53 and HSP90. Results: A total of 133 patients were enrolled. The median PFS was 3.5 (G + P) and 5.3 months (P) (HR = 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.897–1.895; P = 0.16), and PFS rates at 6 months were 22% (G + P) and 33% (P). No significant differences were found in overall survival, objective response rate, and post-progression PFS between arms. The most frequent adverse events were diarrhea (79% vs. 26%), anemia (46% vs. 51%), nausea (41% vs. 40%), and peripheral neuropathy (36% vs. 47%). Serious adverse events were more common in G + P (39.5% vs. 23.3%). Gastrointestinal perforation was a new safety finding. Despite a high TP53 mutation frequency, HSP90–p53 complexes were detected in only 39.6% of the cases and were also detected stably during treatment. In vitro, no synergistic effects of G + P were observed, and mutant p53 depletion did not sensitize ovarian cancer cells to treatment. Conclusions: Although no major safety findings were observed, G + P did not lead to survival benefit. Our companion diagnostic program confirmed that G + P do not favorably cooperate in killing ovarian cancer cells.

Association of the Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms rs11556218, rs4778889, rs4072111, and rs1131445 of the Interleukin-16 Gene with Ovarian Cancer

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the IL-16 gene have been reported to influence the risk of several cancers, but their role in ovarian cancer (OC) has not been studied. Using the restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method, we examined four IL-16 SNPs: rs11556218 (T > G), rs4778889 (T > C), rs4072111 (C > T), and rs1131445 (T > C) in blood samples from 413 women of Central European descent, including 200 OC patients and 213 healthy controls. Among the patients, 62% were postmenopausal, 84.5% were diagnosed in late stages (FIGO IIb-IV), and 73.5% had high-grade serous OC (HGSOC). Minor allele frequencies in controls were 9.2% for rs11556218 (G allele), 13.7% for rs4778889 (C allele), 10.4% for rs4072111 (T allele), and 32.3% for rs1131445 (C allele). We found significant associations of rs11556218 (G vs. T allele: OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.84–4.14, p < 0.0001) with elevated OC risk in the whole cohort (p < 0.001) and in both premenopausal (p < 0.001) and postmenopausal (p = 0.001) subgroups. These associations remained significant across heterozygote (p < 0.001), dominant (p < 0.001), and overdominant (p < 0.001) models. IL-16 rs4778889 was associated with OC risk predominantly in premenopausal women (p < 0.0001 in almost all models). In the whole cohort, the C allele was associated with OC risk (OR 1.54, CI 95% 1.06–2.23, p = 0.024), and the association of rs4778889 was significant in dominant (p = 0.019), overdominant (p = 0.033), and heterozygote (p = 0.027) models. Furthermore, rs4778889 was linked with HGSOC (p = 0.036) and endometriosis-related OC subtypes (p = 0.002). No significant associations were found for rs4072111 or rs1131445 (p = 0.81 or 0.47, respectively). In conclusion, rs11556218 and rs4778889 SNPs are associated with OC risk, especially in premenopausal women.

Gene expression markers in peripheral blood and outcome in patients with platinum‐resistant ovarian cancer: A study of the European GANNET53 consortium

AbstractDisease progression is a major problem in ovarian cancer. There are very few treatment options for patients with platinum‐resistant ovarian cancer (PROC), and therefore, these patients have a particularly poor prognosis. The aim of the present study was to identify markers for monitoring the response of 123 PROC patients enrolled in the Phase I/II GANNET53 clinical trial, which evaluated the efficacy of Ganetespib in combination with standard chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy alone. In total, 474 blood samples were collected, comprising baseline samples taken before the first administration of the study drugs and serial samples taken during treatment until further disease progression (PD). After microfluidic enrichment, 27 gene transcripts were analyzed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and their utility for disease monitoring was evaluated. At baseline, ERCC1 was associated with an increased risk of PD (hazard ratio [HR] 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20–2.55; p = 0.005), while baseline CDH1 and ESR1 may have a risk‐reducing effect (CDH1 HR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46–0.96; p = 0.024; ESR1 HR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.39–0.86; p = 0.002). ERCC1 was observed significantly more often (72.7% vs. 53.9%; p = 0.032) and ESR1 significantly less frequently (59.1% vs. 78.3%; p = 0.018) in blood samples taken at radiologically confirmed PD than at controlled disease. At any time during treatment, ERCC1‐presence and ESR1‐absence were associated with short PFS and with higher odds of PD within 6 months (odds ratio 12.77, 95% CI: 4.08–39.97; p < 0.001). Our study demonstrates the clinical relevance of ESR1 and ERCC1 and may encourage the analysis of liquid biopsy samples for the management of PROC patients.

52Works
3Papers
27Collaborators
Biomarkers, TumorPrognosisOvarian NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaCell Line, TumorTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Positions

2009–

PostDoc

Medical University of Vienna · Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

2009–

Research associate

Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft · Cluster Translational Oncology

2004–

Technician

Medical University of Vienna · Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

1989–

Technician

Universität für Bodenkultur Wien · Institute of Applied Microbiology

Education

2009

Dr. nat. techn.

University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences · Foods Science and Biotechnology

2003

DI

University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences · Foods Science and Biotechnology

1988

BMA

Academy for Biomedical Science

Country

AT

Keywords
circulating tumor cellsliquid biopsyovarian cancermolecular characterization