Eun Ji Lee

Is restaging surgery quintessential in suspected early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer? An ancillary study of the Gynecologic Oncology Research Investigators coLLaborAtion study (GORILLA-3002)

To assess the necessity of restaging surgery for patients with suspected International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I-II epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) following incomplete surgical staging. This multicenter retrospective study evaluated patients with early-stage EOC referred for restaging. These patients were diagnosed with suspected FIGO stage I-II EOC between January 2007 and November 2022 after incomplete surgical staging, and no residual region was confirmed by radiological evaluation. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined. Among the 173 patients included in the study, 56 were assigned to the no restaging surgery group, and 117 to the restaging surgery group. After restaging, 23 were upstaged to other main stage. However, PFS and OS were not significantly different between the groups, also, dividing the groups into 4 groups who underwent chemotherapy and those who did not also did not show significant differences. In multivariate analysis, histologic grade independently influenced PFS outcomes. While restaging surgery resulted in upstaging in some patients, it was not associated with significant differences in PFS or OS in this retrospective analysis. However, the omission of any additional treatment warrants careful consideration and further discussion. Nevertheless, the observation that patients who did not undergo restaging surgery but received adjuvant chemotherapy did not show significantly different prognoses highlights the need for further research to establish appropriate treatment strategies tailored to diverse patient contexts.

Lymphadenectomy in clinically early epithelial ovarian cancer and survival analysis (LILAC): a Gynecologic Oncology Research Investigators Collaboration (GORILLA-3002) retrospective study

This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy in patients surgically treated for clinically early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). This retrospective, multicenter study included patients with clinically early-stage EOC based on preoperative abdominal-pelvic computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging findings between 2007 and 2021. Oncologic outcomes and perioperative complications were compared between the lymphadenectomy and non-lymphadenectomy groups. Independent prognostic factors were determined using Cox regression analysis. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary outcome. Overall survival (OS) and perioperative outcomes were the secondary outcomes. In total, 586 patients (lymphadenectomy group, n=453 [77.3%]; non-lymphadenectomy groups, n=133 [22.7%]) were eligible. After surgical staging, upstaging was identified based on the presence of lymph node metastasis in 14 (3.1%) of 453 patients. No significant difference was found in the 5-year DFS (88.9% vs. 83.4%, p=0.203) and 5-year OS (97.2% vs. 97.7%, p=0.895) between the two groups. Using multivariable analysis, lymphadenectomy was not significantly associated with DFS or OS. However, using subgroup analysis, the lymphadenectomy group with serous histology had higher 5-year DFS rates than did the non-lymphadenectomy group (86.5% vs. 74.4%, p=0.048; adjusted hazard ratio=0.281; 95% confidence interval=0.107-0.735; p=0.010). The lymphadenectomy group had longer operating time (p<0.001), higher estimated blood loss (p<0.001), and higher perioperative complication rate (p=0.004) than did the non-lymphadenectomy group. In patients with clinically early-stage EOC with serous histology, lymphadenectomy was associated with survival benefits. Considering its potential harm, lymphadenectomy should be performed according to histologic subtype and subsequent chemotherapy in patients with clinically early-stage EOC. Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0007309.

Lugol's Solution Reduces Positive Margins and Residual Disease After the Large Loop Excision of Transformation Zone

Objective This study aimed to examine whether the intraoperative use of Lugol's solution reduces the proportion of positive resection margins (RMs) using the data of women who underwent large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). Materials and Methods A total of 1,751 consecutive women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) who underwent LLETZ with or without Lugol's solution were retrospectively retrieved from each database of 3 university hospitals in South Korea. Outcomes included positive RMs and residual disease pathologically confirmed within 6 months after LLETZ. Results Positive RMs were noted in 345 cases (19.7%). Among 1,507 women followed up, residual disease was diagnosed in 100 cases (6.6%) (69/308 cases with positive RMs; 31/1,199 cases with negative RMs). The Lugol's solution group was less likely to have positive RMs (11.8% vs 25.5%, p &lt; .01), to require additional surgical intervention (5.4% vs 10.2%, p &lt; .01), and to have residual disease (4.9% vs 8.0%, p = .02). On multiple logistic regression analysis, Lugol's solution reduced the proportion of positive RMs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.31). Age (50 years or older; aOR, 1.64), preconization cervical cytology (aOR, 1.53), high-risk human papillomavirus (aOR, 1.75), and CIN 2 or 3 (aOR, 2.65) were independent risk factors for margin positivity (p &lt; .01 for all except high-risk human papillomavirus of p = .05). Conclusions Lugol's solution optimizes CIN treatment by reducing the proportion of positive RMs and residual disease after LLETZ.