Investigator

Emma R. Allanson

The University Of Western Australia

ERAEmma R. Allanson
Papers(3)
Routine Tumor Testing…Accuracy of Smartphon…The Australian Societ…
Collaborators(8)
Kathleen M SchmelerMila P. SalcedoNatacha PhoolcharoenPaul A. CohenTarek MeniawyYee LeungBenhur AmanuelCassandra B. Nichols
Institutions(5)
The University Of Wes…The University Of Tex…Chulalongkorn Univers…The University of Wes…Genetic Services of W…

Papers

Routine Tumor Testing for Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Patients With High Grade Epithelial Ovarian Cancer at a Statewide Gynecological Cancer Service in Western Australia: An Observational Study

ABSTRACTBackgroundPoly‐ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors have been shown to improve progression‐free survival in patients with advanced high‐grade epithelial non‐mucinous ovarian cancers characterized by a deficiency in homologous recombination (HRD). Guidelines recommend all patients with advanced high‐grade epithelial ovarian cancer undergo genomic tumor testing for HRD. Our aim was to evaluate the first year of HRD testing at the statewide Western Australia Gynecologic Cancer Service to assess factors associated with obtaining a diagnostic HRD testing result.MethodsRetrospective chart review.ResultsHRD testing was indicated in 84 patients, and ordered in 79, of which three had non‐diagnostic/inconclusive results, all due to insufficient tumor quantity. One patient had the sample collected using a 20‐gauge core biopsy needle under image guidance, one patient following interval debulking surgery, and one following primary debulking surgery. Of 76 patients with an HRD result, HRD was positive in 29 (38.2%). A somatic BRCA mutation was detected in six of these 29 patients (20.6%) and HRD positive, BRCAwt was detected in 23 of 29 patients (79.4%). All core biopsies with 16‐ and 18‐gauge needles had a diagnostic HRD result. Ten of 11 patients who were treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy and whose biopsies were obtained at interval cytoreductive surgery had sufficient tumor tissue for testing and had a diagnostic HRD result. All ascitic/pleural fluid samples sent for HRD testing yielded diagnostic results.ConclusionsCompliance with HRD testing was high, and only three of 79 (3.8%) patients had non‐diagnostic results.

Accuracy of Smartphone Images of the Cervix After Acetic Acid Application for Diagnosing Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or Greater in Women With Positive Cervical Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE Smartphones are used in cervical screening for visual inspection after acetic acid or Lugol's iodine (VIA/VILI) application to capture and share images to improve the sensitivity and interobserver variability of VIA/VILI. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the diagnostic accuracy of smartphone images of the cervix at the time of VIA/VILI (termed S-VIA) in the detection of precancerous lesions in women undergoing cervical screening. METHODS This systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies from January 1, 2010, to June 30, 2020, were assessed. MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, and LILACS were searched. Cohort and cross-sectional studies were considered. S-VIA was compared with the reference standard of histopathology. We excluded studies where additional technology was added to the smartphone including artificial intelligence, enhanced visual assessment, and other algorithms to automatically diagnose precancerous lesions. The primary outcome was the accuracy of S-VIA for the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or greater (CIN 2+). Data were extracted, and we plotted the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of S-VIA using forest plots. This study was prospectively registered with The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews:CRD42020204024. RESULTS Six thousand three studies were screened, 71 full texts assessed, and eight studies met criteria for inclusion, with six included in the final meta-analysis. The sensitivity of S-VIA for the diagnosis of CIN 2+ was 74.56% (95% CI, 70.16 to 78.95; I2 61.30%), specificity was 61.75% (95% CI, 56.35 to 67.15; I2 95.00%), negative predictive value was 93.71% (95% CI, 92.81 to 94.61; I2 0%), and positive predictive value was 26.97% (95% CI, 24.13 to 29.81; I2 61.3%). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that S-VIA has accuracy in the detection of CIN 2+ and may provide additional support to health care providers delivering care in low-resource settings.

10Works
3Papers
8Collaborators
Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsNeoplasm GradingVulvar DiseasesGenital Neoplasms, FemaleEarly Detection of CancerPrecancerous Conditions